Notices

1604v

Old 01-15-2016 | 07:50 AM
  #41  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: B756 FO
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
I went back and looked at the 777 bids from the last bid. They have over 50 guys to train. If this current bid trains before May, it will be a miracle.
There's at least 1 less than that in reality. I'm bidding back to EWR756 before I go to training on the 777.
Reply
Old 01-15-2016 | 12:57 PM
  #42  
Hilltopper89's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
From: 737
Default

Originally Posted by Harrier Dude
There's at least 1 less than that in reality. I'm bidding back to EWR756 before I go to training on the 777.
Why? Might we ask?
Reply
Old 01-15-2016 | 01:04 PM
  #43  
pilotgolfer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Hilltopper89
Why? Might we ask?
70% vs 98%...Lineholder vs. *****.
Reply
Old 01-15-2016 | 01:25 PM
  #44  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 33
From: 777 CA
Default

New snapshot up.
Reply
Old 01-16-2016 | 07:48 AM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: B756 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Hilltopper89
Why? Might we ask?
What pilotgolfer said.

I did the math and figured that being on reserve on the 777 and holding a line on the 756 would be about a wash money-wise. But having a line would make my life a lot easier. Especially since I commute.

I bid reserve in November and December to get Thanksgiving and Christmas off, and while it wasn't too bad (and totally worth it since it actually worked), the short call shenanigans are irritating to say the least.

That's why I'm a NO voter.

Looks like I'll ride out the remainder of 76T on reserve as the flying gets choked off and the pool of available pilots dries up, but that's not the end of the world. I'm looking forward to moving over to the 756 so I can fly something other than LHR.
Reply
Old 01-16-2016 | 09:05 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Harrier Dude
What pilotgolfer said.

I did the math and figured that being on reserve on the 777 and holding a line on the 756 would be about a wash money-wise. But having a line would make my life a lot easier. Especially since I commute.

I bid reserve in November and December to get Thanksgiving and Christmas off, and while it wasn't too bad (and totally worth it since it actually worked), the short call shenanigans are irritating to say the least.

That's why I'm a NO voter.

Looks like I'll ride out the remainder of 76T on reserve as the flying gets choked off and the pool of available pilots dries up, but that's not the end of the world. I'm looking forward to moving over to the 756 so I can fly something other than LHR.

It's your vote. But voting NO will not change the SC issue. It will just get you a lot less money for sitting SC. Consider this....(from Insler's MEC campaign letter) "Should the pilots ratify the TA, we can and will, if I am elected, immediately begin fixing all of the unfinished business of the UPA". Our last contract became amendable Dec 2009. We signed the new one exactly 3 YEARS later. THREE YEARS. Your call.

Oh...sorry...thread drift...err V1604. How about the 20 DEN 737 FO vacancies? Wow. That will bring the FOs within 8 bodies of even with the CAs. Do I dare say no more displacements? sheet hot!! hang'n on.

Sled
Reply
Old 01-16-2016 | 09:10 AM
  #47  
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
It's your vote. But voting NO will not change the SC issue. It will just get you a lot less money for sitting SC. Consider this....(from Insler's MEC campaign letter) "Should the pilots ratify the TA, we can and will, if I am elected, immediately begin fixing all of the unfinished business of the UPA". Our last contract became amendable Dec 2009. We signed the new one exactly 3 YEARS later. THREE YEARS. Your call.

Oh...sorry...thread drift...err How about the 20 DEN 737 FO vacancies? Wow. That will bring the FOs within 8 bodies of even with the CAs. Do I dare say no more displacements? sheet hot!! hang'n on.

Sled
Sled I respect your opinion on these boards but seriously nobody cares anymore.....everyone has voted and most are now just waiting.
Reply
Old 01-16-2016 | 09:15 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
Sled I respect your opinion on these boards but seriously nobody cares anymore.....everyone has voted and most are now just waiting.
True...but you can still change your vote up to the close. Just saying...

Last edited by jsled; 01-16-2016 at 09:27 AM.
Reply
Old 01-16-2016 | 09:36 AM
  #49  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
Sled I respect your opinion on these boards but seriously nobody cares anymore.....everyone has voted and most are now just waiting.
That's primarily why you don't hear much of substance coming out of sled or probe. They're just cutting and pasting from past post on this and other forums. Most have settled in with their vote and letting the majority decision stand. sled will always be known as the "pool boy". There will be no winners either way with the TA.
Reply
Old 01-16-2016 | 09:46 AM
  #50  
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 6
From: 777
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
It's your vote. But voting NO will not change the SC issue. It will just get you a lot less money for sitting SC.
Voting yes certainly will not change the short call issue.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices