1610v
06-09-2016 | 12:51 PM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
I'm sure you know this but for those who don't instructor positions are not included in vacancy bids. They are advertised on CCS then you have to apply and if selected interview for the position. They just hired a batch of 777 instructors. I don't think you'll see any job opening in the 737 or 787 until they know for sure how many folks are going to be coming to DTK from Houston.
06-09-2016 | 01:55 PM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 47
From: 767/757 CA
I was expecting it to be a little bigger but still nice sized. There will be something for everyone here.
The 777 CA growth is dang near 1-1 VS retirements. So this is not the growth bid yet for the 777-300ER
756 CA is also a retirement bid net is -2 on the fleet
The GUM FO spots are interesting.
The 777 CA growth is dang near 1-1 VS retirements. So this is not the growth bid yet for the 777-300ER
756 CA is also a retirement bid net is -2 on the fleet
The GUM FO spots are interesting.
06-09-2016 | 02:53 PM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
IAH was the biggest base at an airline that had three bases and one of them was CLE (Not including GUM). Now the airline has 8 bases to spread the flying over. Of course IAH was going to take a hit. Just be glad the company has decided, for now, not to force the FOs off the 787 in IAH, that would cause a secondary bump mess.
06-09-2016 | 03:24 PM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 18
IAH was the biggest base at an airline that had three bases and one of them was CLE (Not including GUM). Now the airline has 8 bases to spread the flying over. Of course IAH was going to take a hit. Just be glad the company has decided, for now, not to force the FOs off the 787 in IAH, that would cause a secondary bump mess.
