Search

Notices

Public perception

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2017 | 12:18 PM
  #61  
TonyC's Avatar
Organizational Learning 
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,948
Likes: 0
From: Directly behind the combiner
Default

Speaking of public perception:

Y'all know this is a public forum, right? And anybody who has an internet connection can read this thread and witness how "professional" you are in your conversation and personal interaction, right?

I've seen the video and read the article, and for the life of me I cannot find factual information that tells me about the conversation between the Captain and the gate agent before the Captain boarded the airplane. I don't know what the gate agent said, or what the gate agent asked, or how the Captain answered, or how she explained her casual attire. I don't know why she showed up late, or how she explained it to anyone before she got on the airplane. I don't know if anybody else knew or had any reason to know about the stresses in her personal life prior to her intercom announcement.

There have been an awful lot of assumptions made about all that in this thread, and I think any one of us in her situation would not appreciate the assumptions and without doubt misinformation that has been created.


What I do know for sure is that the video concludes with the PA announcement, "Flight attendants please DISARM doors, flight attendants DISARM doors, crosscheck, standby for ALL CALL."

The system worked. Pilots are human, too. How would you want to be treated if it was you?






.
Old 02-14-2017 | 12:23 PM
  #62  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Default

Brainsurgeon

Most pilots are caught after blowing into the machine , therefore they are at work, and at that point the statement comes out that they have a problem or their ALPA rep tells them to make that statement when they are called.

Please don't post things you don't know about
Old 02-14-2017 | 12:33 PM
  #63  
tomgoodman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 0
From: 767A (Ret)
Default

Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon
Does that also apply to alcohol related incidents?
Yes it does apply, so it is never too late to help save someone's career, and even their life. Obviously, the earlier they are intercepted, the less difficult it will be. This is one area where unions, management, and the FAA are in general agreement.
Old 02-14-2017 | 12:48 PM
  #64  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Plane with Wings...
Default

If it is determined that she is in need of help because she has depression, adjustment disorder or something similar she can utilize the services of the EAP program to get help.

If it is depression that she is battling there are four SSRI's that would allow a pilot to regain their first class medical but it will be a long long long long road. The pilot in question will meet with the EAP, then their AME. Next stop is an aviation psychiatrist, then likely a clinical psychiatrist. The clinical psychiatrist is the one that can prescribe medication if they believe it is needed.

That individual will then spend lots of time talking to a counselor. Once they have shown that they are stable on a set dose of an SSRI for a minimum of 6 months they can begin the process of getting their medical back. Their counselor, clinical psychiatrist, aviation psychiatrist must recommend to the AME that they are ready to start the process. Next comes a cognitive screening test and if necessary further psychiatric review. If all of that comes back good they will will get a standard FAA Medical examination that will allow a HIMS AME to sponsor the pilot to the FAA to get their medical back. Their entire medical file is sent to Oak City for review. From there it is forwarded to Washington, DC for the final 5 levels of review.

If granted a special issuance they will have regimented follow ups with everyone from the UAL EAP, their chief pilot, psychiatrist and AME.

All told, if they choose to come back on an SSRI they will lose about 12 to 18 months before they will be flight deck qualified again.
Old 02-14-2017 | 12:53 PM
  #65  
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon
I figured it was to deep for you and I should've dumbed it down some more.
Slats is saying 1 thing and it's what I said earlier. You don't just wake up and say well damn iv lost my mind so let's not go to work today. If it's a true mental break there is no longer conscious decision making.

So whether or not the FFD box gets checked really doesn't mean anything as there is no longer an ability to self assess.
Old 02-14-2017 | 01:12 PM
  #66  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 30west
Brainsurgeon

Most pilots are caught after blowing into the machine , therefore they are at work, and at that point the statement comes out that they have a problem or their ALPA rep tells them to make that statement when they are called.

Please don't post things you don't know about
Did the phrase "it is my understanding" not make it clear to you that it was something I was not sure of? Quite different from something of more definitive type statement.

And no the examples of pilots getting caught that I know of and are public knowledge lately they were caught (suspected) long before the machine which only verified the suspicion. Define caught.

Please don't post things you don't know about.

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
Slats is saying 1 thing and it's what I said earlier. You don't just wake up and say well damn iv lost my mind so let's not go to work today. If it's a true mental break there is no longer conscious decision making.

So whether or not the FFD box gets checked really doesn't mean anything as there is no longer an ability to self assess.
I'm not disputing that whatsoever nor did I infer that. I did emphasize it will probably be something that the lawyers will bring up. Nothing more nothing less.
Old 02-14-2017 | 01:22 PM
  #67  
TonyC's Avatar
Organizational Learning 
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,948
Likes: 0
From: Directly behind the combiner
Default

Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon

Did the phrase "it is my understanding" not make it clear to you that it was something I was not sure of?

...


Please don't post things you don't know about.

OK???









.
Old 02-14-2017 | 01:51 PM
  #68  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: A320 Cap
Default

Originally Posted by Slats Extend
I'm not saying that at all. But you people that think a person with mental illness can check themselves with the FFD box in the ipad have no clue what its all about that is all.

Until you have been point person to have to get someone like this help, quit trying to apply your clear and rational thinking to the situation.

That is what I am saying.
This. + 1,000,000. Excellent excellent post.
Old 02-14-2017 | 04:27 PM
  #69  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: 747 Captain, retired
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC
Speaking of public perception:

Y'all know this is a public forum, right? And anybody who has an internet connection can read this thread and witness how "professional" you are in your conversation and personal interaction, right?

I've seen the video and read the article, and for the life of me I cannot find factual information that tells me about the conversation between the Captain and the gate agent before the Captain boarded the airplane. I don't know what the gate agent said, or what the gate agent asked, or how the Captain answered, or how she explained her casual attire. I don't know why she showed up late, or how she explained it to anyone before she got on the airplane. I don't know if anybody else knew or had any reason to know about the stresses in her personal life prior to her intercom announcement.

There have been an awful lot of assumptions made about all that in this thread, and I think any one of us in her situation would not appreciate the assumptions and without doubt misinformation that has been created.


What I do know for sure is that the video concludes with the PA announcement, "Flight attendants please DISARM doors, flight attendants DISARM doors, crosscheck, standby for ALL CALL."

The system worked. Pilots are human, too. How would you want to be treated if it was you?






.
At last, a rational post about a truly sad incident of one of our own in a crisis meltdown. I have no clue why the pilot showed up without the proper uniform but it does say something about her mental state.
Give it a rest please.
Old 02-14-2017 | 04:54 PM
  #70  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 5
Default

I have seen the video and it is an unfortunate situation that she showed up to work in that condition. Most pilots would know if they are not in the state of mind to fly when faced with a bad event that occurred in their personal life.. What concerns me about her, is that she choose to come to work in a very bad state of mind. I also think this event will be the straw that broke the camels back, and all pilots will be required to pass a psych evaluation in the near future.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PerfInit
Major
2
03-27-2013 03:40 PM
flyover
Major
28
11-02-2009 05:59 PM
joel payne
Hangar Talk
9
03-18-2008 07:21 PM
the King
Hangar Talk
8
11-18-2007 08:11 AM
HSLD
Major
11
07-14-2007 06:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices