Section 744
#1
On Reserve
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 12
Section 744
So I was perusing the interwebs and stumbled upon this the other day...
News Room - ALPA
Here's the verbiage that caught my eye from the story...
"We are disappointed with the inclusion of Section 744—a provision which would introduce significant aviation safety risks by promoting single-operator commercial cargo aircraft. This item was added within the Science, Space, and Technology Committee title and was not debated within the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. ALPA opposes the inclusion of Section 744 because it will undermine the safety of our airspace and urges Congress to reject this provision."
Since I'm awaiting training this fall, anyone have further insight into this?
News Room - ALPA
Here's the verbiage that caught my eye from the story...
"We are disappointed with the inclusion of Section 744—a provision which would introduce significant aviation safety risks by promoting single-operator commercial cargo aircraft. This item was added within the Science, Space, and Technology Committee title and was not debated within the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. ALPA opposes the inclusion of Section 744 because it will undermine the safety of our airspace and urges Congress to reject this provision."
Since I'm awaiting training this fall, anyone have further insight into this?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post