MilKEEP conversion
06-21-2019 | 02:43 PM
#11
On Reserve
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
I hope that was sarcasm. I’d rather have the Atlas types we’ve been hiring or the guys who have experience operating as a crew.
06-21-2019 | 03:54 PM
#12
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 343
Likes: 2
06-23-2019 | 07:23 AM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
From: Leftof longitudinal
You must operate as a crew hitting the tanker, flying with the 2 or 3 others on your wing. Section approach to IMC minimums in 2 aircraft. It is a crew concept, very coordinated. Have done both for over 25 years. I see the strengths of a professional aviator regardless of background, crew is crew, both are good. Both quick learners at this stage of career (quality of hours over just hours)
Have flown with less than professional from both backgrounds too including many former heavy cargo.etc.
06-24-2019 | 06:54 AM
#14
On Reserve
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 113
Likes: 4
If I recall, the application specifically says not to add the conversion. You can put it in your resume or logbook spelled out (conversion applied), but you don’t even need a logbook at the interview - I just brought my Air Force records. Bottom line, The point of the conversion is to make up for the taxi time you don’t typically log in the Air Force so I don’t see why you wouldn’t apply it to PIC.
07-09-2019 | 11:10 AM
#15
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
If I recall, the application specifically says not to add the conversion. You can put it in your resume or logbook spelled out (conversion applied), but you don’t even need a logbook at the interview - I just brought my Air Force records. Bottom line, The point of the conversion is to make up for the taxi time you don’t typically log in the Air Force so I don’t see why you wouldn’t apply it to PIC.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
