New Zealand Arrival Video
03-07-2014 | 10:47 AM
#1
Thread Starter
On Reserve
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
New Zealand Arrival Video
Pretty cool arrival, although I would've been a little nervous around the 2:45 mark...
Arrival Video
Arrival Video
03-08-2014 | 07:12 AM
#2
Banned
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Pretty cool arrival, although I would've been a little nervous around the 2:45 mark...
Arrival Video
Arrival Video
"I wonder if it could cause a navigation error? Not that its been tested or anything."
"I wonder if the FAA could use it as de facto evidence of violation of sterile cockpit below 10,000 feet...performing tasks not related to flying the airplane."
"Then, maybe I'll post it on the Internet."
What could go wrong? Idiots.
03-08-2014 | 02:23 PM
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: BD-700A
I flew into NZQN a couple months back. An already high pucker factor is compounded when your POS Honeywell doesnt have the GNSS approaches
VOR/DME ARC minimums left us at 4200' above the field 1nm from the end of the runway and you have to visually circle inside a bowl.
AIP New Zealand
VOR/DME ARC minimums left us at 4200' above the field 1nm from the end of the runway and you have to visually circle inside a bowl. AIP New Zealand
03-14-2014 | 09:11 AM
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: just a co-pilot
Here we go again: "Hey here's a good idea...Let's put a non-STCed piece of equipment on the glareshield in IFR conditions into mountainous terrain and film the arrival."
"I wonder if it could cause a navigation error? Not that its been tested or anything."
"I wonder if the FAA could use it as de facto evidence of violation of sterile cockpit below 10,000 feet...performing tasks not related to flying the airplane."
"Then, maybe I'll post it on the Internet."
What could go wrong? Idiots.
"I wonder if it could cause a navigation error? Not that its been tested or anything."
"I wonder if the FAA could use it as de facto evidence of violation of sterile cockpit below 10,000 feet...performing tasks not related to flying the airplane."
"Then, maybe I'll post it on the Internet."
What could go wrong? Idiots.
03-14-2014 | 09:51 AM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: A300, FO
Here we go again: "Hey here's a good idea...Let's put a non-STCed piece of equipment on the glareshield in IFR conditions into mountainous terrain and film the arrival."
"I wonder if it could cause a navigation error? Not that its been tested or anything."
"I wonder if the FAA could use it as de facto evidence of violation of sterile cockpit below 10,000 feet...performing tasks not related to flying the airplane."
"Then, maybe I'll post it on the Internet."
What could go wrong? Idiots.
"I wonder if it could cause a navigation error? Not that its been tested or anything."
"I wonder if the FAA could use it as de facto evidence of violation of sterile cockpit below 10,000 feet...performing tasks not related to flying the airplane."
"Then, maybe I'll post it on the Internet."
What could go wrong? Idiots.
Lighten up frances! Stop being such a nancy, my god man I bet you are a joy to fly with damn dude go sell cars or something. Let us real people with a little common sense stick with aviation.
03-14-2014 | 09:52 AM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: A300, FO
Here we go again: "Hey here's a good idea...Let's put a non-STCed piece of equipment on the glareshield in IFR conditions into mountainous terrain and film the arrival."
"I wonder if it could cause a navigation error? Not that its been tested or anything."
"I wonder if the FAA could use it as de facto evidence of violation of sterile cockpit below 10,000 feet...performing tasks not related to flying the airplane."
"Then, maybe I'll post it on the Internet."
What could go wrong? Idiots.
"I wonder if it could cause a navigation error? Not that its been tested or anything."
"I wonder if the FAA could use it as de facto evidence of violation of sterile cockpit below 10,000 feet...performing tasks not related to flying the airplane."
"Then, maybe I'll post it on the Internet."
What could go wrong? Idiots.
03-14-2014 | 10:14 AM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Here we go again: "Hey here's a good idea...Let's put a non-STCed piece of equipment on the glareshield in IFR conditions into mountainous terrain and film the arrival."
"I wonder if it could cause a navigation error? Not that its been tested or anything."
"I wonder if the FAA could use it as de facto evidence of violation of sterile cockpit below 10,000 feet...performing tasks not related to flying the airplane."
"Then, maybe I'll post it on the Internet."
What could go wrong? Idiots.
"I wonder if it could cause a navigation error? Not that its been tested or anything."
"I wonder if the FAA could use it as de facto evidence of violation of sterile cockpit below 10,000 feet...performing tasks not related to flying the airplane."
"Then, maybe I'll post it on the Internet."
What could go wrong? Idiots.
03-14-2014 | 05:51 PM
#8
Banned
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Not at all. Just got sick and tired of having to spend Union dues dollars defending guys who did STUPID things in the cockpit, especially in front of FAA ACIs.
And posting your violations of sterile cockpit and usage of non-approved, non-STCed electrical devices in flight on the Internet is just about as STUPID as you can get.
But then again, you can't fix STUPID.
And posting your violations of sterile cockpit and usage of non-approved, non-STCed electrical devices in flight on the Internet is just about as STUPID as you can get.
But then again, you can't fix STUPID.
03-15-2014 | 05:27 AM
#9
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 F/O
Not at all. Just got sick and tired of having to spend Union dues dollars defending guys who did STUPID things in the cockpit, especially in front of FAA ACIs.
And posting your violations of sterile cockpit and usage of non-approved, non-STCed electrical devices in flight on the Internet is just about as STUPID as you can get.
But then again, you can't fix STUPID.
And posting your violations of sterile cockpit and usage of non-approved, non-STCed electrical devices in flight on the Internet is just about as STUPID as you can get.
But then again, you can't fix STUPID.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
