Search

Notices

SWA buyout?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2017 | 04:41 AM
  #51  
Caveman's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 485
Likes: 2
From: American Airlines Brake Pad Replacement Technician
Default SWA buyout?

Why was AT for sale?
Reply
Old 12-03-2017 | 05:39 AM
  #52  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,841
Likes: 652
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Caveman
Why was AT for sale?

All public companies are for sale unless the owner retains > 50% equity.
Reply
Old 12-03-2017 | 08:06 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: 737
Default

Originally Posted by Caveman
Why was AT for sale?
So the executives could make millions extra.
Reply
Old 12-03-2017 | 09:16 AM
  #54  
TransWorld's Avatar
Gets Everyday Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
Default

Originally Posted by Caveman
Why was AT for sale?
Why was TWA for sale? It’s stock price was low enough that Carl Icahn, the corporate raider, could buy it and make money off its most valuable assets.

Last edited by TransWorld; 12-03-2017 at 09:55 AM.
Reply
Old 12-03-2017 | 03:10 PM
  #55  
Caveman's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 485
Likes: 2
From: American Airlines Brake Pad Replacement Technician
Default SWA buyout?

Why was TWAs stock price so low? Was ATs stock price low too?
Reply
Old 12-03-2017 | 03:23 PM
  #56  
TransWorld's Avatar
Gets Everyday Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
Default

Originally Posted by Caveman
Why was TWAs stock price so low?
Wiki has a good summary. . .

“As the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 led to a wave of airline failures, start-ups, and takeovers in the United States, TWA was spun off from its holding company in 1984. Carl Icahn acquired control of TWA and took the company private in a leveraged buyout in 1988.”

The entire industry had low stock prices due to competitors failing and going backrupt. It did not lend confidence in the stock market for ANY airline. Hence low stock price. (I.e. less than liquidation value.)

Certainly some other factors lead Icahn selecting TWA, probably not the least of which was the strongest U.S. airline presence at Heathrow. Those gates slots were almost like gold and easily sold. Gate slots at Heathrow still are valuable.
Reply
Old 12-04-2017 | 08:06 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
Let’s just call a spade a spade here. The SWA/AT deal was a gun held to the AT pilot group’s head. NO ONE on our side thought it was a fair or good deal and yet well over 80% voted to accept it. Think about that. What does that tell you?
At the risk of beating a dead horse........

No offense, but what kind of deal do you think you'd have gotten had GK been honest about the fate of the 717s prior to the vote?

When we voted on the SLI, everyone on both sides thought that you guys were bringing a proportional number of seats for all of the pilots, which certainly gave you guys some leverage.

Imagine the outcome had we all known that 2/3s of those seats would evaporate by the time you guys migrated over.

I suspect that several high up SWAPA types knew about the 717's departure at the time we voted, and agreed not to disclose it, in the name of getting the thing passed with as little cost/difficulty to the company as possible.

IMHO, it would have been far worse for you guys had SWAPA not had such a cozy relationship with GK, and ignored the leverage of those seats going away, potentially putting 2/3s of your pilots on the street.

Make no mistake that the same threats will be hurled towards the Alaska pilot group (or Spirit or whoever). You’re dealing with a pilot group and union that actually proposed putting ALL of our pilots on probation once they transitioned over to the SWA side. Yes, even our most senior cptns. Yes, you read that right.

So just keep in mind the pompous mentality & attitude that we’re talking about here. Be careful what you wish for.
Yeah, we've got some real "hired..... not acquired" winners around here.

Last edited by SlipKid; 12-04-2017 at 08:33 AM.
Reply
Old 12-04-2017 | 08:11 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
I don't think it would ever survive any DOJ scrutiny as it would give Southwest a virtual monopoly on the West Coast.
You think this DOJ gives a **** about monopolies? They allowed net neutrality to die, and we will all pay an assload for that mess.
Reply
Old 12-04-2017 | 08:59 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,257
Likes: 238
From: B737CA
Default

Originally Posted by jcountry
You think this DOJ gives a **** about monopolies? They allowed net neutrality to die, and we will all pay an assload for that mess.


Yes I do. Seems like you’re mixing apples and potatoes.
Reply
Old 12-04-2017 | 11:32 AM
  #60  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,841
Likes: 652
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by jcountry
You think this DOJ gives a **** about monopolies? They allowed net neutrality to die, and we will all pay an assload for that mess.
Net neutrality is concept with no precedent, and no fundamental legal basis.

Anti-trust policy and regulation are clear, and well-established.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brakes Set
Southwest
10
06-25-2012 10:03 PM
Sr. Barco
Southwest
44
10-12-2011 07:39 PM
brakechatter
Major
602
10-12-2010 11:54 AM
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 08:31 PM
SWAjet
Major
44
01-19-2006 12:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices