Seniority Proposals
05-23-2018 | 09:15 PM
#421
Guest
Posts: n/a
There was not any mention of furloughs, mostly continued discussion of what we’ve already heard, slowed growth, deferred deliveries, no hiring, opening another airbus base was inefficient and not cost effective, but the one that got my attention the most was that JFK might not be the last base closure we see in the future.
05-24-2018 | 07:07 PM
#423
Guest
Posts: n/a
So they say....Too close to SEA, too small a city with out much industry. Better suited to pass thru flying on Airbus/Boeing and E-175 origination flying. That was the plan anyway before the abandonment of California. We shall see.
05-25-2018 | 10:06 AM
#424
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
To be accurate. The AS CA seat protections which provide for preserving the AS to VX ratio of CA's is only valid if the total number of CA's is equal to or less than the total at the implementation date. So long as the total number of CA's exceeds the total #at implementation, the AS proposal (ratio preservation)does not protect the 137 VX CA's who are pushed below the stovepipe CA line on the AS list.
Mgmt has also ceded their intent to return an airbus when the lease terminates next year while taking more Boeings.
With shifting bases and a static bus fleet the odds are the AS proposal exposes MANY VX CA's to a loss of seat with a decision favoring the AS list and "condition and restriction."
Mgmt has also ceded their intent to return an airbus when the lease terminates next year while taking more Boeings.
With shifting bases and a static bus fleet the odds are the AS proposal exposes MANY VX CA's to a loss of seat with a decision favoring the AS list and "condition and restriction."
Last edited by YXnot; 05-25-2018 at 10:47 AM.
05-26-2018 | 05:51 AM
#425
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
To be accurate. The AS CA seat protections which provide for preserving the AS to VX ratio of CA's is only valid if the total number of CA's is equal to or less than the total at the implementation date. So long as the total number of CA's exceeds the total #at implementation, the AS proposal (ratio preservation)does not protect the 137 VX CA's who are pushed below the stovepipe CA line on the AS list.
Mgmt has also ceded their intent to return an airbus when the lease terminates next year while taking more Boeings.
With shifting bases and a static bus fleet the odds are the AS proposal exposes MANY VX CA's to a loss of seat with a decision favoring the AS list and "condition and restriction."
Mgmt has also ceded their intent to return an airbus when the lease terminates next year while taking more Boeings.
With shifting bases and a static bus fleet the odds are the AS proposal exposes MANY VX CA's to a loss of seat with a decision favoring the AS list and "condition and restriction."
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DLax85
Cargo
14
06-26-2008 03:26 PM
