Search

Notices

Seniority Proposals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2018 | 04:18 PM
  #391  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 258
Likes: 7
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by OCCP
It’s going to be a disaster no matter what the outcome is. One big fat ****ed off pilot group.
TRUE... but guess what, get over it...
Reply
Old 05-21-2018 | 11:43 PM
  #392  
Klsytakesit
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

all the angst and bitterness that is building around this is crazy. I could see it if this airline was a quality career but it isnt and it never was. It is like fighting over which Denny’s you are going to work at. It is just a job. It doesn’t matter whether you are number 1 at Dennys or number 2000 it is still Dennys. Crazy misplaced ego you all have
Reply
Old 05-22-2018 | 05:42 AM
  #393  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by Ch1956ris
Can someone post each group’s proposal to the arbitrator?

Is longevity given a higher weighting in the combined list?
Longevity is not given more weight per say via the ALPA merger policy. It is one of the the three items required to be considered in designing an SLI. In the past several mergers longevity has been used with different weights. Most of them have used around a 15% weight. Which was the VX side proposal. The AS side proposed a 70% weight I believe.

The proposals are very long and would be impossible to post here. But to give you the gist of them...

Alaska says that VX pilots received a huge windfall by getting to become Alaska pilots and adopting their contrat. That they have massive advantage in longevity and that should be primary. Except for their first officers which should get special feathering above VX first officers despite lower longevity.

Virgin side says that although weight should be allowed for longevity a more consistent hybrid model should be used set of past precedents. That carry through the whole list.

Both sides put in captain seat protections.

The proposals create a pretty diverse results depending on where you are on the list. There is no point in predicting because depending on the decision you could see a very different outcome.

Everyone is going to be irritated about the final list. So honestly this discussion is pointless.
Reply
Old 05-22-2018 | 05:54 AM
  #394  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by airb320
TRUE... but guess what, get over it...


It’s hard to get over a stalled career.
Reply
Old 05-22-2018 | 08:21 AM
  #395  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 258
Likes: 7
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by OCCP
It’s hard to get over a stalled career.
I agree with you yet again... do something about it! You can’t change the Arbitrators ruling but you can control how you will feel/behave.

Are you
A. going to be miserable or
B. get over it, move on, apply elsewhere if need be... it’s a choice

Think about it, the only one that will be truly “happy” is the #1 Pilot on the combined list, everyone else will probably loose out at varying degrees😉
Reply
Old 05-22-2018 | 09:02 AM
  #396  
Dirtdiver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: 767A
Default

Originally Posted by OCCP
It’s hard to get over a stalled career.
Hard to find someone in the airline industry who can't claim a stalled career. Consider yourself lucky if you're just stalled and not furloughed, or worse out on the street starting over. The only possible exception I can think of is FedEx.
Reply
Old 05-22-2018 | 10:30 AM
  #397  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Default

If Alaska doesn’t put a rudder on this ship we’ll probably all get furloughed
Reply
Old 05-22-2018 | 11:55 AM
  #398  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by airb320
I agree with you yet again... do something about it! You can’t change the Arbitrators ruling but you can control how you will feel/behave.

Are you
A. going to be miserable or
B. get over it, move on, apply elsewhere if need be... it’s a choice

Think about it, the only one that will be truly “happy” is the #1 Pilot on the combined list, everyone else will probably loose out at varying degrees😉
OCCP will for sure be miserable. Already is and is the most negative toxic poster on here. Imagine what that's like in the cockpit?
For me...I'll get over it and move on and deal with it as it comes. Happiness is a choice. Dealing with negative things in life is a constant struggle everyone goes through..some deal with it better than others.
Reply
Old 05-22-2018 | 12:17 PM
  #399  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 776
Likes: 1
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by 4andCounting
Longevity is not given more weight per say via the ALPA merger policy. It is one of the the three items required to be considered in designing an SLI. In the past several mergers longevity has been used with different weights. Most of them have used around a 15% weight. Which was the VX side proposal. The AS side proposed a 70% weight I believe.

Alaska says that VX pilots received a huge windfall by getting to become Alaska pilots and adopting their contract. That they have massive advantage in longevity and that should be primary. Except for their first officers which should get special feathering above VX first officers despite lower longevity.
UAL said the same thing in our merger and didn’t get it. “Superior airline” isn’t part of merger policy either. Everyone stayed within 5% of their same seniority percentage despite United having almost 4 times the number of widebody airplanes.

Even with longevity weighted at 35% I was placed with a United pilot hired 7+ years before me. Zero United pilots who were placed senior to me are younger than me.

I hate to tell you, but if you’re banking on longevity to be heavily weighted, its not going to be. I’d be shocked to see anyone move more than 5-10% anywhere on your list.
Reply
Old 05-22-2018 | 12:26 PM
  #400  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 258
Likes: 7
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
UAL said the same thing in our merger and didn’t get it. “Superior airline” isn’t part of merger policy either. Everyone stayed within 5% of their same seniority percentage despite United having almost 4 times the number of widebody airplanes.

Even with longevity weighted at 35% I was placed with a United pilot hired 7+ years before me. Zero United pilots who were placed senior to me are younger than me.

I hate to tell you, but if you’re banking on longevity to be heavily weighted, its not going to be. I’d be shocked to see anyone move more than 5-10% anywhere on your list.
Exactly! Look at the last 4 mergers and with the exception of WN (special circuumstance) relative seniority was king😉.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
Anonymous
Cargo
7
03-18-2009 11:59 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
mike734
Major
15
09-17-2007 12:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices