![]() |
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 2569923)
True, but as a ticked off AirTran pilot once said, “contracts come and go, seniority is forever.” :D
|
Originally Posted by Tailstand
(Post 2570119)
At 29 years seniority I had hoped to transfer to SFO to be number 1, not number 10 :p
|
Originally Posted by tacoma1946
(Post 2570112)
You must be VX. Why should a pilot that started in 2007 be matched with a guy that was hired 30 years ago? What you are saying is a 25 year old that was hired as a co pilot by VX in 2007 will be matched with a 60 year old that was hired 30 years ago. Really?
|
Remove first 300 super senior Alaska pilots and place them on the side. Then relative seniority starting at 301 (assume that’s the new #1), once your done re-paste the 300 back on top of the list and call it a day. Solved.
|
Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
(Post 2570133)
Do you not understand that a relative integration by definition preserves your relative seniority? A straight DOH gives Alaska pilots a huge boost to their relative seniority. No Alaska pilot would ever be on reserve and they would be able to hold weekends off. Meanwhile, a Virgin pilot who was a line holder goes back to reserve overnight.
|
Originally Posted by tacoma1946
(Post 2570146)
It is not a straight doh. You start at 2007 since that is when you were created. You then do the 1 for 3 or what ever the ratio is. That is all you deserve. Sorry but that is life.
|
Originally Posted by tacoma1946
(Post 2570112)
You must be VX. Why should a pilot that started in 2007 be matched with a guy that was hired 30 years ago? What you are saying is a 25 year old that was hired as a co pilot by VX in 2007 will be matched with a 60 year old that was hired 30 years ago. Really?
And how is "matching" those two guys going to realistically adversely affect the QOL of the AS guy when they are in different bases, on different fleets and the AS guy will probably retire in 5 years or so?
Originally Posted by tacoma1946
(Post 2570146)
It is not a straight doh. You start at 2007 since that is when you were created. You then do the 1 for 3 or what ever the ratio is. That is all you deserve. Sorry but that is life.
|
Originally Posted by tacoma1946
(Post 2570146)
That is all you deserve. Sorry but that is life.
Sorry, but that is only your opinion and the history of airline mergers indicates that your opinion is extremely unlikely to be shared by anyone in charge. |
Originally Posted by EskimoJoe
(Post 2568643)
How did you think this VX thing was going to end? Either buy out of Chapter 7. That was is it. I seriously doubt any of you thought this was going to be a 30 year career under the VX brand.
Originally Posted by opdeliber
(Post 2569136)
4 pages of nonsense. The seniority list is going to be what it is and none of us have a say. Just pipe down already
Originally Posted by tacoma1946
(Post 2570146)
It is not a straight doh. You start at 2007 since that is when you were created. You then do the 1 for 3 or what ever the ratio is. That is all you deserve. Sorry but that is life.
-- This has been my $0.02 from a outsider's perspective. How this ends up will be interesting though, especially with the Alaska/Hawaiian merger on the horizon :D |
Originally Posted by CaptainCarl
(Post 2570241)
Lots of them have slugged through the industry for many years and finally found a port that offered some semblance of stability, even if only for 11 years.
My blue (which is supposed to be orange but they caved on that too like everything else) lanyard is in the trash. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:25 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands