Alaska General Discussion
#1922
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 672
Likes: 223
#1923
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 811
Likes: 113
#1925
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,906
Likes: 691
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
#1927
Out of curiosity how full are the 717’s? Can you not just semi reduce service and put it on bigger aircraft? I fly the 717 for Delta and the fuel burn is almost identical to a CFM powered 737/320 so I don’t see what the issue is with just replacing them with that. To me this seems like an easy answer and you get a solid 30-40 more seats out of that alone for the same operating costs.
#1929
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 376
Likes: 37
From: FO Obvious
Absolutely. However, if we hold on inter-island scope AND don't also adjust the overall ratio down they will be able to flood the mainland/ANC with 175s, due to the size of the overall fleet/planned growth. I'll be a no if both inter-island scope, and mainland scope are not protected.
#1930
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 434
Likes: 32
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



