Alaska General Discussion
#2021
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 186
A321 orders my dude. A330 orders too.
We're sitting around waiting for a certification that may or may not come "on time." It's pure hopium to believe the timetable at this point.
Meanwhile merger morale is headed for the dumper because of impending displacements and infighting for the miniscule amount of growth in our future.
We're sitting around waiting for a certification that may or may not come "on time." It's pure hopium to believe the timetable at this point.
Meanwhile merger morale is headed for the dumper because of impending displacements and infighting for the miniscule amount of growth in our future.
Again: This contract better be amazing AF considering our likely seniority progression for the duration of the JCBA
#2022
Keeping aircraft on property that you didn't originally intend to could also be considered growth.
They need to drop the charade and commit long term to the aircraft they've already purchased via merger.
Also Airbus gave priority to United to get their A321 fleet up and running. I would imagine Toulouse would do the same for a "new" customer.
They need to drop the charade and commit long term to the aircraft they've already purchased via merger.
Also Airbus gave priority to United to get their A321 fleet up and running. I would imagine Toulouse would do the same for a "new" customer.
The airline just made a huge aircraft purchase and has basically laid out its short-term plan through 2030. You just saw the commitment. This airline is committed to Boeing. They could buy Spirit tomorrow and trust me when I say this, those Airbuses would go away eventually. The former President of Alaska is on the BOD at Boeing. The Amazon contract will for sure go away, I would bet my licenses on it. The next sure bet is that this airline will be a Boeing airline more than likely. The only variable is the island flying and even then I think we see the 717 replaced with 737s
#2023
Angle lake has telegraphed clearly and repeatedly that the 330F isn't making money now. If they can't negotiate something profitable what happens next is so simple....pick the lesser loss, either completing the term of the contract or buying themselves out. The second the latter one becomes clearly cheaper, that's what they will do. They can literally make that decision tomorrow. Probably the only thing keeping the $$ on the side of keeping them today is the TPA block hour requirements already mentioned. I don't want to see any of my coworkers displaced out of anything but that's an unlikely outcome. I still hold out a fools hope that someone will come to their senses and find value in the fleet diversity and potential for the XLR in the 321 program. But that really is a fools hope. They have bet the farm on Boeings max 10 promises. It's a hell of a risk.
#2024
Banned
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 140
The airline just made a huge aircraft purchase and has basically laid out its short-term plan through 2030. You just saw the commitment. This airline is committed to Boeing. They could buy Spirit tomorrow and trust me when I say this, those Airbuses would go away eventually. The former President of Alaska is on the BOD at Boeing. The Amazon contract will for sure go away, I would bet my licenses on it. The next sure bet is that this airline will be a Boeing airline more than likely. The only variable is the island flying and even then I think we see the 717 replaced with 737s
They can go all Boeing and we can muddle along- Displacing and waiting.
Or we could diversify and actually have a growth plan to match the rhetoric.
This insider relationship isn't the best for the pilots or the bottom line. But I bet it's great for the 19th hole.
#2025
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 811
Likes: 113
HA doesn’t have a wholly owned subsidiary consisting of AZ pilots. We also don’t have a separate seniority list, we have a CVG base, that is all.
All names will be removed from the integration, The chips will fall where they may. There may or may not be fences towards the 737. If not, and an AZ pilot has to bid 737, that is what will happen if they can hold it. Same with AS pilots if there are no widebody fences and a displacement should happen.
If the #1 AZ pilot happened to be the #1 senior HA pilot, by your logic he will fall behind other HA pilots simply because he chose to go to CVG instead of commuting to HNL? ( or he really liked all the soft money)
I’m no HA cheerleader, but your logic is flawed in that you aren’t understanding the AZ contract doesn’t make them ACMI pilots in the context of legacy airline benefits and work rules. They work under the best freight rules in the industry and are amongst the highest paid vs. FDX/UPS.
You can keep wishing the AZ pilots will suffer seniority losses, it’s just not gonna happen. They aren’t putting names or current job titles into SLI. It’s “X” number of slots. There is no windfall if you are a Cpt vs FO or AZ pilot vs pax pilot. Thats why there is no need for an FO to go to the left seat before integration to secure they reap more benefits of seniority
#2026
On Reserve
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 140
Likes: 5
Concerning JCBA: I hope we get a kickass one that raises the bar for everyone else. (and make sure we have snap up)
Concerning SLI: I hope it goes to arbitration that follows ALPA merger guidelines so everyone is equally unhappy - but can't blame each other.
And then I hope all of us have a long and profitable career.
Concerning SLI: I hope it goes to arbitration that follows ALPA merger guidelines so everyone is equally unhappy - but can't blame each other.
And then I hope all of us have a long and profitable career.
#2027
The mock SLI posted on Alyeska is concerning. I’m honestly surprised the union is allowing someone to publish a speculative seniority integration using what appears to be membership data. Putting out an unofficial “mock” list feels unnecessary and inflammatory it’s almost guaranteed to create anxiety and division among pilots.
What bothers me even more is the data side of it. Requiring an @alaska email to sign up means a third party is collecting and storing verified company email addresses tied to membership information. That’s not something I’m comfortable with. Even if you don’t actively sign up, it sounds like your information may already exist in their database, which raises real privacy and security questions.
His project seems like it croses the line from “helpful tool” into “unauthorized data use,” and I’m surprised the union hasn’t stepped in. I may reach out to them directly to make sure they’re aware it exists.
What bothers me even more is the data side of it. Requiring an @alaska email to sign up means a third party is collecting and storing verified company email addresses tied to membership information. That’s not something I’m comfortable with. Even if you don’t actively sign up, it sounds like your information may already exist in their database, which raises real privacy and security questions.
His project seems like it croses the line from “helpful tool” into “unauthorized data use,” and I’m surprised the union hasn’t stepped in. I may reach out to them directly to make sure they’re aware it exists.
#2028
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 672
Likes: 223
Again your question is overly simplistic and meant to provoke me.
#2029
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 672
Likes: 223
You can't possibly be taken as a serious person if you think the dots being connected is that you should lose your job, because HAL was in the red. Seriously, what is wrong with you? You are literally arguing with yourself. Nobody is putting down HAL pilots or saying that you should be on the street. Nobody is saying ANYTHING for that matter, only you are.
#2030
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 672
Likes: 223
if after SLI his seniority is higher than yours, barring fences, yes.
HA doesn’t have a wholly owned subsidiary consisting of AZ pilots. We also don’t have a separate seniority list, we have a CVG base, that is all.
All names will be removed from the integration, The chips will fall where they may. There may or may not be fences towards the 737. If not, and an AZ pilot has to bid 737, that is what will happen if they can hold it. Same with AS pilots if there are no widebody fences and a displacement should happen.
If the #1 AZ pilot happened to be the #1 senior HA pilot, by your logic he will fall behind other HA pilots simply because he chose to go to CVG instead of commuting to HNL? ( or he really liked all the soft money)
I’m no HA cheerleader, but your logic is flawed in that you aren’t understanding the AZ contract doesn’t make them ACMI pilots in the context of legacy airline benefits and work rules. They work under the best freight rules in the industry and are amongst the highest paid vs. FDX/UPS.
You can keep wishing the AZ pilots will suffer seniority losses, it’s just not gonna happen. They aren’t putting names or current job titles into SLI. It’s “X” number of slots. There is no windfall if you are a Cpt vs FO or AZ pilot vs pax pilot. Thats why there is no need for an FO to go to the left seat before integration to secure they reap more benefits of seniority
HA doesn’t have a wholly owned subsidiary consisting of AZ pilots. We also don’t have a separate seniority list, we have a CVG base, that is all.
All names will be removed from the integration, The chips will fall where they may. There may or may not be fences towards the 737. If not, and an AZ pilot has to bid 737, that is what will happen if they can hold it. Same with AS pilots if there are no widebody fences and a displacement should happen.
If the #1 AZ pilot happened to be the #1 senior HA pilot, by your logic he will fall behind other HA pilots simply because he chose to go to CVG instead of commuting to HNL? ( or he really liked all the soft money)
I’m no HA cheerleader, but your logic is flawed in that you aren’t understanding the AZ contract doesn’t make them ACMI pilots in the context of legacy airline benefits and work rules. They work under the best freight rules in the industry and are amongst the highest paid vs. FDX/UPS.
You can keep wishing the AZ pilots will suffer seniority losses, it’s just not gonna happen. They aren’t putting names or current job titles into SLI. It’s “X” number of slots. There is no windfall if you are a Cpt vs FO or AZ pilot vs pax pilot. Thats why there is no need for an FO to go to the left seat before integration to secure they reap more benefits of seniority
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



