SEA 787 Base
#4
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 379
Likes: 38
From: FO Obvious
#5
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 814
Likes: 347
I needed that, thank you
#7
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 814
Likes: 347
The way he worded that is confusing. HAL already had 8 options. Did he mean that are confirming 5 of those or are they just adding to those options. He also said the future fleet will be 17 so it sounds like they are exercising 5 of the existing options not adding 5 new options
#8
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 379
Likes: 38
From: FO Obvious
The way he worded that is confusing. HAL already had 8 options. Did he mean that are confirming 5 of those or are they just adding to those options. He also said the future fleet will be 17 so it sounds like they are exercising 5 of the existing options not adding 5 new options
#9
The way he worded that is confusing. HAL already had 8 options. Did he mean that are confirming 5 of those or are they just adding to those options. He also said the future fleet will be 17 so it sounds like they are exercising 5 of the existing options not adding 5 new options
They are exercising five of the existing options bring it up to 17 confirmed orders
#10
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,186
Likes: 807
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
That was my take as well.
If they were just emphasizing the fact that they had options, I'd be concerned that they were dangling WB carrots to grease the JCBA skids, but this does not appear to be that.
Methinks they might be expediting their international plans to counter DL's moves. In the past they would have retreated immediately at the first whiff of competition.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



