Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
SAN Base opening, finally… >

SAN Base opening, finally?

Search

Notices

SAN Base opening, finally…

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2025 | 08:52 AM
  #71  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 351
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I don't think so. There is a talent pool, skywest and Navy, many with deep roots.
Anyone who can live in SAN, could afford SFO. Skywest has an SFO base. The Navy isn't producing hundreds of pilots out of NAS North Island to interview.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 08:54 AM
  #72  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 681
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
Cruz can say for sure, but most airlines run monthly or at least semi-regular position bids and adjust vacancies for a given bid.
My experience with that involved large airlines, who typically had a need for that kind of frequency anyway. And in one case the regular scheduled bids would be base swap only, if there were no actual vacancies, and you could only swap like equipment/seat.

If we wanted that, it would need to be in the CBA of course, company isn't going to willingly incur moving expenses and training just for our convenience. We could negotiate for it.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 08:57 AM
  #73  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 351
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
My experience with that involved large airlines, who typically had a need for that kind of frequency anyway. And in one case the regular scheduled bids would be base swap only, if there were no actual vacancies, and you could only swap like equipment/seat.

If we wanted that, it would need to be in the CBA of course, company isn't going to willingly incur moving expenses and training just for our convenience. We could negotiate for it.
Skywest, SWA, JB all run monthly base bids along with the top 3. It's time to act like a real airline.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 08:59 AM
  #74  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 681
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
Anyone who can live in SAN, could afford SFO. Skywest has an SFO base. The Navy isn't producing hundreds of pilots out of NAS North Island to interview.

Many folks who live in SAN would have no desire whatsoever to live in the bay area, that's apples to oranges in many ways.

NASNI is only part of it. The entire 3rd marine air wing is in San Diego.

There are also a lot of senior staff billets at various HQ's, many of which are filled with aviators who are short final to retirement.

I gave airline career advice to many such folks over years in the reserves, I do have some SA.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 09:01 AM
  #75  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 681
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
Skywest, SWA, JB all run monthly base bids along with the top 3. It's time to act like a real airline.
I'm not saying we shouldn't do it. I'm saying those other airlines are all larger than us (pilot count), SWA is a lot larger.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 09:08 AM
  #76  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 351
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Many folks who live in SAN would have no desire whatsoever to live in the bay area, that's apples to oranges in many ways.

NASNI is only part of it. The entire 3rd marine air wing is in San Diego.

There are also a lot of senior staff billets at various HQ's, many of which are filled with aviators who are short final to retirement.

I gave airline career advice to many such folks over years in the reserves, I do have some SA.
I mean, you also have NAS Lemoore (I was stationed there), and we have exactly zero pilots in SFO from there. Could there be demand for SAN? Sure, but this idea that SFO is completely unbelievable when Skywest has a large base there. You might very well be right, but again, you are talking about new hires, which means that the company actually has to interview and hire people who live there. We all know how that goes.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 09:11 AM
  #77  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 351
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I'm not saying we shouldn't do it. I'm saying those other airlines are all larger than us (pilot count), SWA is a lot larger.
Skywest isn't much larger, and is about the same as our combined airline. JB is similar size. This is another one of those things that comes along with a "global worldwide real airline" or whatever moniker the company wants to use.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 09:13 AM
  #78  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 681
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
I mean, you also have NAS Lemoore (I was stationed there), and we have exactly zero pilots in SFO from there. Could there be demand for SAN? Sure, but this idea that SFO is completely unbelievable when Skywest has a large base there. You might very well be right, but again, you are talking about new hires, which means that the company actually has to interview and hire people who live there. We all know how that goes.
I think their reasoning for the SAN is fundamentally hotel costs. Pilot hiring pool would seem like a secondary consideration, but it's not just about hiring, it's also about retention.

Lemoore is irrelevant, almost nobody puts down roots there, it has more in common with Minot AFB in that regard. SAN is a fleet concentration center, you have opportunities for multiple tours over your career, so it's easy to get roots. And a nice place to live.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 09:14 AM
  #79  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 681
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
Skywest isn't much larger, and is about the same as our combined airline. JB is similar size. This is another one of those things that comes along with a "global worldwide real airline" or whatever moniker the company wants to use.
Sure I agree. Just pointing out the numbers, which matter at the negotiating table.
Reply
Old 12-02-2025 | 09:28 AM
  #80  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,348
Likes: 331
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The fundamental crux of the issue is should a junior CA be afforded special protection in system bids over FO's who are senior to him? Just because "Captain"?

Why not extend that to domicile as well, since it's reasonably more disruptive to one's life if you have to move the whole family to another city... as opposed to taking a paycut that drops you from the top 5% of earners down to top 10%.

You could argue the case, and the company might even prefer it since it would turn two training events into zero training events and keep the guy higher on the longevity scale in the right seat.

But fundamentally that's not the precedent for how seniority works in our era. Aside from special cases in a merger like the Red Circle thing (I'm not even sure that was ever even triggered?).

I think most would be opposed.

We did get Red Circle Captain protections from the arbitrators of the VX/AS SLI that offered a protection for current Captains as of the effective date of SLI. It never had to be used. But it does set a recent precedent, no?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlyGuy2021
American
995
11-30-2023 03:40 PM
mike734
Horizon Air
4031
01-30-2023 06:00 PM
FlyGuy2112
Republic Airways
136
01-17-2021 04:09 PM
Joliet
PSA Airlines
33
02-20-2014 03:21 AM
duder
Compass Airlines
10
11-14-2013 04:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices