Search

Notices

First to phase out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2026 | 04:57 PM
  #31  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 351
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by Akamai
This is the question HAL has been battling for a decade. There is no current production aircraft that can handle interisland. If they can use Ng’s for another decade then they can be replaced with the sea gliders we got coming.
MAXs can absolutely do this job if these airframes are woven into the overall network. That would take fewer airframes overall (the current 717 fleet is 17), so let's say the flying could be done with maybe 10 airframes. You can weave 10 737s through the islands and have them enter and exit where they aren't dedicated to the island, and shorten the life of these MAX engines. There are no non NEO/MAX engined aircraft being made, so this is going to be something to live with unless the company gets another aircraft type like a 175 or a Q400, and I don't see that happening. For one, Embraer is all cycle limited, so that puts more of a handicap on aircraft than a MAX engine would, and the Q, I just don't see happening.
Reply
Old 03-23-2026 | 05:24 PM
  #32  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 375
Likes: 37
From: FO Obvious
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
MAXs can absolutely do this job if these airframes are woven into the overall network. That would take fewer airframes overall (the current 717 fleet is 17), so let's say the flying could be done with maybe 10 airframes. You can weave 10 737s through the islands and have them enter and exit where they aren't dedicated to the island, and shorten the life of these MAX engines. There are no non NEO/MAX engined aircraft being made, so this is going to be something to live with unless the company gets another aircraft type like a 175 or a Q400, and I don't see that happening. For one, Embraer is all cycle limited, so that puts more of a handicap on aircraft than a MAX engine would, and the Q, I just don't see happening.
It’s too bad Embraer cancelled their turboprop project. A combination of mainline narrow bodies and turbo props could keep a good amount of frequency while not dumping too much capacity into the system.
Reply
Old 03-23-2026 | 06:19 PM
  #33  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 351
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by DenainaPilot
It’s too bad Embraer cancelled their turboprop project. A combination of mainline narrow bodies and turbo props could keep a good amount of frequency while not dumping too much capacity into the system.
Yea, even more ironic is that the Q would be a FANTASTIC inter-island bird, and we got rid of them all lol. A 76 seat turboprop would be great for the islands.
Reply
Old 03-23-2026 | 06:28 PM
  #34  
Jetlikespeed's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 875
Likes: 181
From: Captain
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
Yea, even more ironic is that the Q would be a FANTASTIC inter-island bird, and we got rid of them all lol. A 76 seat turboprop would be great for the islands.
q can’t fit much cargo pit could barley fit a full boat worth of bags during non ski season, during ski season we were stuffing bags in the cabin to fit all the skis, great for quick turns and frequency but won’t be able to move any cargo, can barley fit 76 people’s worth of bags.

over head bins are too small so basically anything that’s not a small suit case or back back has to go in the pit
flew the Q for 5 years that’s why the Q base in ANC failed could not fit all the pax checked bags in Alaska and 0 cargo can be shipped on them. No belly stowage small Pit by the tail

I don’t think it would do well with interisland due to my assuming we also make money on shipping cargo between the islands
Reply
Old 03-23-2026 | 06:40 PM
  #35  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 351
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by Jetlikespeed
q can’t fit much cargo pit could barley fit a full boat worth of bags during non ski season, during ski season we were stuffing bags in the cabin to fit all the skis, great for quick turns and frequency but won’t be able to move any cargo, can barley fit 76 people’s worth of bags.

over head bins are too small so basically anything that’s not a small suit case or back back has to go in the pit
flew the Q for 5 years that’s why the Q base in ANC failed could not fit all the pax checked bags in Alaska and 0 cargo can be shipped on them. No belly stowage small Pit by the tail

I don’t think it would do well with interisland due to my assuming we also make money on shipping cargo between the islands
Does the 717 hold a lot of cargo? I honestly don't know.
Reply
Old 03-23-2026 | 07:31 PM
  #36  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,870
Likes: 668
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
Does the 717 hold a lot of cargo? I honestly don't know.
More than an RJ. RJ's (and commuter props) basically just have capacity for some pax checked bags.

Start adding sandbags for CG and some RJs end up leaving checked bags behind. Or pax, if the airline prefers that (some do).
Reply
Old 03-23-2026 | 07:32 PM
  #37  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,870
Likes: 668
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Jetlikespeed
I don’t think it would do well with interisland due to my assuming we also make money on shipping cargo between the islands
Apparently longboards are important too.
Reply
Old 03-23-2026 | 08:48 PM
  #38  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 183
Likes: 26
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
Yea, even more ironic is that the Q would be a FANTASTIC inter-island bird, and we got rid of them all lol. A 76 seat turboprop would be great for the islands.
Island Air failed for a bunch of reasons, but one of them was switching to the Q (and then back to the ATR when it didn't work).
Reply
Old 03-23-2026 | 09:57 PM
  #39  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 295
Likes: 44
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Apparently longboards are important too.
Surfboards and golf clubs are very important, and they don’t fit in an RJ or a turbo prop.
Reply
Old 03-23-2026 | 10:03 PM
  #40  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 295
Likes: 44
Default

Originally Posted by TTail
Island Air failed for a bunch of reasons, but one of them was switching to the Q (and then back to the ATR when it didn't work).
This! Even if you used the correct turboprop, they don’t have the cargo capacity, and there isn’t the gate space for the increased number of aircraft required to replace the 717’s.

Aloha stopped flying Ng’s interisland, and ended up only using them on mainland routes because of engine issues.

At least it sounds like Minnicucci understands the engine issue.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
youcanever
Career Questions
1
07-01-2014 03:44 PM
Sluggo_63
Cargo
11
05-21-2014 09:24 PM
Turboprop
Regional
16
02-28-2014 11:51 AM
Kprc1
Regional
81
02-25-2014 09:28 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-09-2005 09:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices