Search

Notices

Alaska Air Hiring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2019 | 06:12 AM
  #4361  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Isn't that why they bought VX?
They bought VX to keep B6 off the West Coast. That's why they over paid for it.
Reply
Old 09-21-2019 | 07:08 AM
  #4362  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,847
Likes: 653
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat
They bought VX to keep B6 off the West Coast. That's why they over paid for it.
But that only works if they keep the gates... if they don't use the gates SFO will give them to someone who will.
Reply
Old 09-22-2019 | 07:14 AM
  #4363  
Flyboy8784's Avatar
Am I Wrong??????????
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: ThE jEtTtTtTtT
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
But that only works if they keep the gates... if they don't use the gates SFO will give them to someone who will.
It's pretty surreal to watch. Company says that the plan for our future is to "Win California", yet all we seem to do be doing is retreating mainline airframes to the PACNW and letting the regionals grow.

We now have more 320 departures out of SEA than we do out of LAX.....and there is no base in SEA for the 320.
Reply
Old 09-22-2019 | 08:16 AM
  #4364  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by Flyboy8784
It's pretty surreal to watch...yet all we seem to do be doing is retreating mainline airframes to the PACNW and letting the regionals grow.

We now have more 320 departures out of SEA than we do out of LAX.....and there is no base in SEA for the 320.
And this surprises you because....?
Reply
Old 09-22-2019 | 09:18 AM
  #4365  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Default

Originally Posted by Flyboy8784
It's pretty surreal to watch. Company says that the plan for our future is to "Win California", yet all we seem to do be doing is retreating mainline airframes to the PACNW and letting the regionals grow.

We now have more 320 departures out of SEA than we do out of LAX.....and there is no base in SEA for the 320.
That's how you show off your "proudly Boeing" fleet to the hometown crowd.....wait...
Reply
Old 09-23-2019 | 12:57 AM
  #4366  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Flyboy8784
It's pretty surreal to watch. Company says that the plan for our future is to "Win California", yet all we seem to do be doing is retreating mainline airframes to the PACNW and letting the regionals grow.

We now have more 320 departures out of SEA than we do out of LAX.....and there is no base in SEA for the 320.
Welcome to Alaska. Let Skywest and code shares do the flying, it’s cheaper. And don’t forget to sell those credit cards.
Reply
Old 09-23-2019 | 07:28 AM
  #4367  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: GearBbychoice
Default

Originally Posted by ImperialxRat
Welcome to Alaska. Let Skywest and code shares do the flying, it’s cheaper. And don’t forget to sell those credit cards.
Yep grow as much regional flying as possible and drag out negotiations as long as possible before they are forced to deal with scope.
Reply
Old 09-23-2019 | 06:25 PM
  #4368  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Isn't that why they bought VX?
They bought VX to make VX go away. Plain and simple.
Reply
Old 09-23-2019 | 07:18 PM
  #4369  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Default

Don't worry, when that international facility is finished up at the south end of the airport, Delta will have access to ~20 international gates, will probably flood SEA with wide bodies and just drive AS into the ground and then purchase the whole operation. AS doesn't have excess capacity but DAL and just about every other airline does. And, AS can't grow fast enough because they'll flood the market and drive ticket prices down.
Reply
Old 09-23-2019 | 11:58 PM
  #4370  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,347
Likes: 329
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
That's how you show off your "proudly Boeing" fleet to the hometown crowd.....wait...
Why so much angst over "Proudly all Boeing?" Mainline was all Boeing until the merger. Were they really expected to un-paint those from 100+ planes? I'd rather have Proudly all Boeing painted on the plane than some of the nonsense we had like "Frances."
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Hangar Talk
1
05-03-2011 05:44 PM
joel payne
Foreign
4
04-23-2009 01:38 PM
vagabond
Major
31
04-15-2009 08:51 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 12:50 PM
vagabond
Major
19
06-15-2007 06:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices