Alaska Air Hiring
#4391
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 69
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You don’t hire a third party that specializes in fleet modeling to just return to a single type.
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
#4392
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 936
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You should read up on the range/ payload capability of the EMB-190E2.
Considering we don’t have scope it seemed like the most important and frightening part of the emails we received today.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#4393
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 694
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hey, I’d love to see a dual fleet. I’d love to see them add all kinds of new types to the certificate, (flown by AS pilots). Reality is, they’re most likely just bidding time until the Max is back up and flying so they can announce their decision with a show of confidence from the FAA and Boeing to help alleviate pax fears. They’ve had more than 3 years to “study” the Bus and make a dual fleet decision. I don’t see it happening. Believe me, I hope I’m wrong and there is a large diversified a/c order but......common.
#4394
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 694
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If flown by AS pilots, I say bring it on. We may not have scope now but by the time they could even consider bringing a larger RJ on property, we’d be so embroiled in section 6 (section 1) negotiations, I doubt they’d be willing to risk announcing such a venture and still believe the operation would run as usual. I think we’d get a chance to vote in some meaningful protections by the time such an a/c were to be talked about. The 190 E2 was in our hangar last year too, haven’t see it in AS paint yet...
#4395
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,912
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post