Search

Notices

Alaska Air Hiring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2026 | 06:35 PM
  #8821  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Exclamation

Moving contract talk to JCBA thread.
Reply
Old Yesterday | 05:41 PM
  #8822  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Default

I have about 20 years left and assuming little growth does it look like an upgrade is in the cards? I understand how late to the game I am and especially with all the hiring that was post covid. Not that being a sr. Fo is a bad gig.
Reply
Old Yesterday | 08:16 PM
  #8823  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by FLYZERG
I have about 20 years left and assuming little growth does it look like an upgrade is in the cards? I understand how late to the game I am and especially with all the hiring that was post covid. Not that being a sr. Fo is a bad gig.
You would most likely upgrade if desired, airline movement goes in starts and stops, like rush hour traffic. We're stalled right now but eventually growth and retirements will add up to movement.

Whether you'd want to be a 50+ junior CA is another issue, probably have to wait and see what movement and QOL is like when the time comes. As you say senior FO isn't bad either at these pay rates (top-tier QOL).
Reply
Old Yesterday | 09:03 PM
  #8824  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 128
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
You would most likely upgrade if desired, airline movement goes in starts and stops, like rush hour traffic. We're stalled right now but eventually growth and retirements will add up to movement.

Whether you'd want to be a 50+ junior CA is another issue, probably have to wait and see what movement and QOL is like when the time comes. As you say senior FO isn't bad either at these pay rates (top-tier QOL).

“You would most likely upgrade”? I'd sure hope he can upgrade after 20 years on property.
Reply
Old Yesterday | 09:18 PM
  #8825  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Hornetdrvr
“You would most likely upgrade”? I'd sure hope he can upgrade after 20 years on property.
I would hope so too. But there are negligible retirements for a lot of that time, and if we end up with fleet consolidation instead of growth it could be pretty ugly. So yes, most likely. But not absolute 100%.

I also meant "upgrade young enough to make it worth the hassle", so that probably means within 15 years.
Reply
Old Yesterday | 10:14 PM
  #8826  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 763
Likes: 305
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I would hope so too. But there are negligible retirements for a lot of that time, and if we end up with fleet consolidation instead of growth it could be pretty ugly. So yes, most likely. But not absolute 100%.

I also meant "upgrade young enough to make it worth the hassle", so that probably means within 15 years.
HAL and ASA retires around 2-4% of its pilots every year?
Reply
Old Today | 06:08 AM
  #8827  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,460
Likes: 473
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I would hope so too. But there are negligible retirements for a lot of that time, and if we end up with fleet consolidation instead of growth it could be pretty ugly. So yes, most likely. But not absolute 100%.

I also meant "upgrade young enough to make it worth the hassle", so that probably means within 15 years.
Negligible retirements over 20 years? You’re joking right?
Reply
Old Today | 06:59 AM
  #8828  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Negligible retirements over 20 years? You’re joking right?
Again I was thinking 12-15-ish years, so the guy actually makes some CA money for a few years.

Retirements are pretty negligible on the AS side. I don't know for sure but have heard HA is similar.

The "Hopefully" part comes into play in the event that some WBs go away (AZ), and there is NB fleet consolidation.

So yes there is a risk that upgrades could drag out even longer than today. "Hopefully" not but it is possible with consolidation/stagnation.

If the guy wants to upgrade no later than 64 1/2, so he can have scrambled eggs and four stripes in his retirement photos, yeah that should be a safe enough assumption.

Anyway that's the worst case. And I mean realistic worst case because it could happen if DL gets real aggressive in SEA and SWA in CA and HI (not trying to factor fringe cases like asteroid impact, pandemic, nuclear war, etc).

There are also many better cases.... growth, early retirements, etc.
Reply
Old Today | 09:22 AM
  #8829  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 763
Likes: 305
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Again I was thinking 12-15-ish years, so the guy actually makes some CA money for a few years.

Retirements are pretty negligible on the AS side. I don't know for sure but have heard HA is similar.

The "Hopefully" part comes into play in the event that some WBs go away (AZ), and there is NB fleet consolidation.

So yes there is a risk that upgrades could drag out even longer than today. "Hopefully" not but it is possible with consolidation/stagnation.

If the guy wants to upgrade no later than 64 1/2, so he can have scrambled eggs and four stripes in his retirement photos, yeah that should be a safe enough assumption.

Anyway that's the worst case. And I mean realistic worst case because it could happen if DL gets real aggressive in SEA and SWA in CA and HI (not trying to factor fringe cases like asteroid impact, pandemic, nuclear war, etc).

There are also many better cases.... growth, early retirements, etc.
What are the retirement numbers? I don’t know how to process negligible.
Reply
Old Today | 09:29 AM
  #8830  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by MrBogardi
What are the retirement numbers? I don’t know how to process negligible.
They are not enough to make up for potential realistic stagnation and fleet consolidation, if it comes to pass. We are stagnate right now, consolidation is TBD.

A 25 y/o or 35 y/o new hire should have a nice long run in the left seat of something. A 45+ plus new-hire? Not strictly assured.

More likely there will be some growth, and current payscales facilitate early retirement for those who want it so most likely the upgrade time will be in the 10-12 year range for a while. But if anything goes wrong it could be worse (AZ, 321/717 dumped without one-for-one replacement).

If HA has massive retirement numbers (like AA) that I'm not aware of, then I'm completely off base.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Hangar Talk
1
05-03-2011 05:44 PM
joel payne
Foreign
4
04-23-2009 01:38 PM
vagabond
Major
31
04-15-2009 08:51 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 12:50 PM
vagabond
Major
19
06-15-2007 06:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices