Alaska Air Hiring
#8822
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
I have about 20 years left and assuming little growth does it look like an upgrade is in the cards? I understand how late to the game I am and especially with all the hiring that was post covid. Not that being a sr. Fo is a bad gig.
#8823
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Whether you'd want to be a 50+ junior CA is another issue, probably have to wait and see what movement and QOL is like when the time comes. As you say senior FO isn't bad either at these pay rates (top-tier QOL).
#8824
On Reserve
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 128
Likes: 18
You would most likely upgrade if desired, airline movement goes in starts and stops, like rush hour traffic. We're stalled right now but eventually growth and retirements will add up to movement.
Whether you'd want to be a 50+ junior CA is another issue, probably have to wait and see what movement and QOL is like when the time comes. As you say senior FO isn't bad either at these pay rates (top-tier QOL).
Whether you'd want to be a 50+ junior CA is another issue, probably have to wait and see what movement and QOL is like when the time comes. As you say senior FO isn't bad either at these pay rates (top-tier QOL).
“You would most likely upgrade”? I'd sure hope he can upgrade after 20 years on property.
#8825
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
I also meant "upgrade young enough to make it worth the hassle", so that probably means within 15 years.
#8826
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 763
Likes: 306
I would hope so too. But there are negligible retirements for a lot of that time, and if we end up with fleet consolidation instead of growth it could be pretty ugly. So yes, most likely. But not absolute 100%.
I also meant "upgrade young enough to make it worth the hassle", so that probably means within 15 years.
I also meant "upgrade young enough to make it worth the hassle", so that probably means within 15 years.
#8827
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,460
Likes: 473
I would hope so too. But there are negligible retirements for a lot of that time, and if we end up with fleet consolidation instead of growth it could be pretty ugly. So yes, most likely. But not absolute 100%.
I also meant "upgrade young enough to make it worth the hassle", so that probably means within 15 years.
I also meant "upgrade young enough to make it worth the hassle", so that probably means within 15 years.
#8828
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Again I was thinking 12-15-ish years, so the guy actually makes some CA money for a few years.
Retirements are pretty negligible on the AS side. I don't know for sure but have heard HA is similar.
The "Hopefully" part comes into play in the event that some WBs go away (AZ), and there is NB fleet consolidation.
So yes there is a risk that upgrades could drag out even longer than today. "Hopefully" not but it is possible with consolidation/stagnation.
If the guy wants to upgrade no later than 64 1/2, so he can have scrambled eggs and four stripes in his retirement photos, yeah that should be a safe enough assumption.
Anyway that's the worst case. And I mean realistic worst case because it could happen if DL gets real aggressive in SEA and SWA in CA and HI (not trying to factor fringe cases like asteroid impact, pandemic, nuclear war, etc).
There are also many better cases.... growth, early retirements, etc.
Retirements are pretty negligible on the AS side. I don't know for sure but have heard HA is similar.
The "Hopefully" part comes into play in the event that some WBs go away (AZ), and there is NB fleet consolidation.
So yes there is a risk that upgrades could drag out even longer than today. "Hopefully" not but it is possible with consolidation/stagnation.
If the guy wants to upgrade no later than 64 1/2, so he can have scrambled eggs and four stripes in his retirement photos, yeah that should be a safe enough assumption.
Anyway that's the worst case. And I mean realistic worst case because it could happen if DL gets real aggressive in SEA and SWA in CA and HI (not trying to factor fringe cases like asteroid impact, pandemic, nuclear war, etc).
There are also many better cases.... growth, early retirements, etc.
#8829
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 763
Likes: 306
Again I was thinking 12-15-ish years, so the guy actually makes some CA money for a few years.
Retirements are pretty negligible on the AS side. I don't know for sure but have heard HA is similar.
The "Hopefully" part comes into play in the event that some WBs go away (AZ), and there is NB fleet consolidation.
So yes there is a risk that upgrades could drag out even longer than today. "Hopefully" not but it is possible with consolidation/stagnation.
If the guy wants to upgrade no later than 64 1/2, so he can have scrambled eggs and four stripes in his retirement photos, yeah that should be a safe enough assumption.
Anyway that's the worst case. And I mean realistic worst case because it could happen if DL gets real aggressive in SEA and SWA in CA and HI (not trying to factor fringe cases like asteroid impact, pandemic, nuclear war, etc).
There are also many better cases.... growth, early retirements, etc.
Retirements are pretty negligible on the AS side. I don't know for sure but have heard HA is similar.
The "Hopefully" part comes into play in the event that some WBs go away (AZ), and there is NB fleet consolidation.
So yes there is a risk that upgrades could drag out even longer than today. "Hopefully" not but it is possible with consolidation/stagnation.
If the guy wants to upgrade no later than 64 1/2, so he can have scrambled eggs and four stripes in his retirement photos, yeah that should be a safe enough assumption.
Anyway that's the worst case. And I mean realistic worst case because it could happen if DL gets real aggressive in SEA and SWA in CA and HI (not trying to factor fringe cases like asteroid impact, pandemic, nuclear war, etc).
There are also many better cases.... growth, early retirements, etc.
#8830
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
A 25 y/o or 35 y/o new hire should have a nice long run in the left seat of something. A 45+ plus new-hire? Not strictly assured.
More likely there will be some growth, and current payscales facilitate early retirement for those who want it so most likely the upgrade time will be in the 10-12 year range for a while. But if anything goes wrong it could be worse (AZ, 321/717 dumped without one-for-one replacement).
If HA has massive retirement numbers (like AA) that I'm not aware of, then I'm completely off base.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




