|
Originally Posted by Squeakygreaser
(Post 3578627)
I agree. I can take a dump in a box and mark it guaranteed. Any one who has worked at Allegiant should know that those types of guarantees mean nothing. The way to incentivize the company to have more day trips is to pay a lot more for overnight trips. Then at least the pilots who are losing on the schedule gain on the money. Who gets paid when the company violates the percent of day trips? Does that just get paid out to those that filed a grievance? no thanks.
|
Originally Posted by captnate702
(Post 3578646)
Hahahaha why negotiate or fight for any work rules then if management is gonna do what they want?? If that’s the case then just give me the rates.
|
Originally Posted by captnate702
(Post 3578646)
Hahahaha why negotiate or fight for any work rules then if management is gonna do what they want?? If that’s the case then just give me the rates.
|
Originally Posted by Squeakygreaser
(Post 3578661)
Well, answer the question then. How much does the company pay when they violate it and how do they distribute that money?
|
Originally Posted by Squeakygreaser
(Post 3578661)
Well, answer the question then. How much does the company pay when they violate it and how do they distribute that money?
But I’m not the one getting paid $600k to negotiate this contract but for $600k I’m sure I could come up with something. Of course AR could negotiate that stuff. I just think it’s funny that y’all don’t want this work rule because company won’t follow it but then want to strike over other work rules as if the company will obey those ones because they are supposedly “industry standard.” Makes perfect sense. |
Originally Posted by captnate702
(Post 3578671)
Could be in the scope section with expedited arbitration like our current wet lease stuff. Could be in scheduling where any base that doesn’t get the min % of day trips is paid an extra amount for the entire BES.
But I’m not the one getting paid $600k to negotiate this contract but for $600k I’m sure I could come up . I think the fairest and simplest way to accomplish this objective is to have the multi-day trips pay more per day than day trips. I wouldn't cause a huge stink if the TA came back with the type of rule you are asking for in it, but I just think it's not the best way to do it. Because it's more complicated, and requires more litigation when it gets broken. I don't think you want to tell the company what they can't do in a contract, I think you want to tell them what it will cost them to do it. |
Originally Posted by captnate702
(Post 3578572)
There are some on the NC and E Board that will never accept a deal that doesn't include a min % of day trips. I believe them when they say this is a line in the sand that will not be compromised. Time will tell.
|
Originally Posted by rdneckpilot
(Post 3578711)
a percentage of day trips is not all day trips. Which one are you talking about?
I don’t know the number that union proposed for min % of day trips. I know that members of NC and E Board have will not accept a contract that doesn’t have a min % of day trips. |
Originally Posted by captnate702
(Post 3578558)
We proposed a min % of trips must be day trips, management rejected it and sources say it hasn't been brought up since. If there is min% of trips must be day trips then that is a difficult thing to "ignore" when its a number that can easily be quantified. Similar to min # of days in a month, etc.
Y'all can poo poo my biggest asks, and my "sample size" but none of you have mentioned any other reason for being here. Margi, tom, tailend, etc. why are you all here if not for the day trips? please give me one reason you are still here? if you don't have other options, i get it. But anybody with options would be crazy to stay here unless they valued the day trips. there is nothing that this place offers to keep somebody here... Still waiting to hear of any reason why someone would stay here if not for the day trips... How about bc they’ve invested years of seniority here and done want to start over at the bottom? |
Originally Posted by captnate702
(Post 3578731)
Not sure I understand your question?
I don’t know the number that union proposed for min % of day trips. I know that members of NC and E Board have will not accept a contract that doesn’t have a min % of day trips. Negotiations to achieve a guaranteed min percentage of day trips is completely different and potentially attainable. So long as the company doesn’t see the day trips affecting their ability to adapt to future needs. Just don’t expect the percentage to be very high. Getting the company to agree to the current percentage of day trips in contract is a fairy tail. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:40 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands