Notices

Allegiant Country

Old 01-14-2026 | 06:42 AM
  #71  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2025
Posts: 39
Likes: 23
Default

Originally Posted by Captainbfv
I agree with pretty much what you're saying. I'm very optimistic of course bc of what I'm hearing, but I do agree with you, there is a bit of skepticism even from me. Which is why I want to see what happens this Thursday and Friday. I'm sure we will get union comms afterwards, and of course I will continue to converse with many. I pray I don't get this one wrong. As like many other things I've spoken of, there's always a part of me that hopes I didn't call it incorrectly. Which is why I try not to boast when I call it right, bc I know there's just something else around the corner I could get wrong.

But we'll see my friend. Fingers crossed! Cheers!
You’ve gotten things right? You make my head spin! Weren’t you pro JR and his NC, then pro GU, pro IBT, then anti GU, pro ALPA, now anti JR and the old NC, and pro RJ and the current NC?
Reply
Old 01-14-2026 | 06:46 AM
  #72  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,115
Likes: 795
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by AsianSensastion
I’m hearing that the labor disputes must be calmed before the transaction goes through. They can’t go into a merger with 1300 ****ed off pilots who are owed a lot of money This is why Captainbfv might be right in this case. Most likely we will reach a SUBPAR agreement sometime this year.
At time of merger approval, HA contract had some time to run, but AS was up. Rather than try to deal with two negotiations in parallel, the company just extended the AS regularly scheduled raises by a couple years to bridge the gap. Probably best for all involved, and I assume your pilot group would get to vote on it.
Reply
Old 01-14-2026 | 06:56 AM
  #73  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,115
Likes: 795
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Hightime80
JCBA is usually super abbreviated compared to typical sec 6. (Think months not years).
AS/HA JCBA is heading into years territory, at least a couple. It is more complicated with all the WB stuff, but I have the sense that company is fine with lower costs on the HA side for a while longer.

Originally Posted by Hightime80
List integration is a huge piece of leverage, hence why many groups go in that order…JCBA then SLI.
SLI might grant them more flexibility but it might also open up a lot of short-term training churn as people bid into newly available opportunities (especially in our case). So I wouldn't automatically *ASSume* the company will want it quick.

The order of JCBA then SLI is codified in ALPA policy and hopefully every ALPA CBA. I'm not sure if that's entirely up to the pilots unless it's in one CBA or the other. Might have to hash out the order with the company as part of a TPA. But yeah there are several good reasons to do JCBA first.

So I guess it comes down to what scope language SY has?


Originally Posted by Hightime80
We already have been offered better than SY +$80 so let’s not start saying we’ll take what they had in 2021. We should be expecting more like the company’s last comp proposal IMHO with a caveat that negotiations resume immediately upon merger approval or denial.
I would assume that this merger will get approved, quickly.
Reply
Old 01-14-2026 | 07:10 AM
  #74  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 181
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
At time of merger approval, HA contract had some time to run, but AS was up. Rather than try to deal with two negotiations in parallel, the company just extended the AS regularly scheduled raises by a couple years to bridge the gap. Probably best for all involved, and I assume your pilot group would get to vote on it.
Vote? Like how they voted for a Retention Bonus that ruined all leverage in negotiations and handcuffed so many from leaving? Or like the vote to remove the union prez and replace him by Toonster nationals with their own self-interest to prevent any contract? Or like the vote for ALPA while they attacked members and threatened them with legal action for pushing cards and then told them they would lose HUNDEREDS OF THOUSANDS in retention bonus payouts if they left Toonsters? Oh wait......there was no vote for any of that. So why expect a vote now?
Reply
Old 01-14-2026 | 07:28 AM
  #75  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,115
Likes: 795
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Do your union rules require a vote for compensation changes?
Reply
Old 01-14-2026 | 07:31 AM
  #76  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 181
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Do your union rules require a vote for compensation changes?
Toonsters don't care about rules. And no, there was no vote for the RB, an avenue of attack to NOT pay it the company possesses.
Reply
Old 01-14-2026 | 09:28 AM
  #77  
pipercub's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 506
Likes: 67
From: MD80 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Captainbfv
Look, anything is possible right? But, all I can say is based on what I'm hearing in my conversations, it appears that both sides want to seal a deal. As far as GU or National getting in the way, my understanding is that there was a serious conversation recently were RJ told the IBT to not meddle, or intervene or they WILL lose this pilot group to ALPA much, much faster. From what I was told, it appears the IBT was very receptive. As far as the company goes, I was also told that the leadership told everyone on their side to put their "guns" down, and lock down a TA. So I just encourage everyone to see what happens this week. My assumption based on the current information, we should see progress.

The acquisition announcement definitely changed the dynamic. Not to mention from what I heard the mediator is not going to entertain any impasse, or proffer talk. It is very clear to me now, that although we can blame the company, the fact remains that it was the NC that conducted themselves in a very amateur manner, and that their only goal/agenda was to achieve an impasse. That is absolutely dead right now. No more games. We're going to have to lock something down, even if it's "watered" down.

Like Nate said, and I've been saying on Whatsapp and FB, if we don't lock SOMETHING down, and soon, we will be negotiating from were we currently are for years. We are now in this position because of the absolute arrogance, ignorance, recklessness from short sided individuals that wanted too much instead of bringing actual progress and improvements. Their past comms said it all! It was just chaos, shifting the goal post, and narrative control. A whole bunch of half truths and nonsense almost got us iced out (AGAIN).

After THREE different mediators, it was beyond clear to me who was the real problem here. I was branded a company plant and other nonsense bc I called out their bluff. It is what it is... time for a TA ladies and gents.
Well hope your right, had heard different comments had come out of management saying it stays the same tell after. I would say they have very little time and if very little to no progress is made this week getting something prior to the deal will be hard to impossible.
Reply
Old 01-14-2026 | 09:29 AM
  #78  
pipercub's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 506
Likes: 67
From: MD80 CA
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Do your union rules require a vote for compensation changes?
Yes any change of the contract via a new TA or some kind of MOU for Pay and retirement would have to be voted on by pilots
Reply
Old 01-14-2026 | 03:19 PM
  #79  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 323
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by Hightime80
JCBA is usually super abbreviated compared to typical sec 6. (Think months not years) List integration is a huge piece of leverage, hence why many groups go in that order…JCBA then SLI. We already have been offered better than SY +$80 so let’s not start saying we’ll take what they had in 2021. We should be expecting more like the company’s last comp proposal IMHO with a caveat that negotiations resume immediately upon merger approval or denial.
This number might be a bit skewed. I've seen a pdf making the rounds, and it's not based on the current SY pay. I think it's based on DOS+2.
The slopes are a whole other subject, but for now here's what sy rates +$80 would look like.
FO year 1 - $168
FO year 12 - $274

CA year 1 - $300
CA year 12 - $373

I would love to see you guys get those number, but I'm thinking some data might be inaccurate there.

Now, if I could get my screenshots to upload.
Reply
Old 01-14-2026 | 03:24 PM
  #80  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 323
Likes: 13
Default

Upload not playing nice today.

https://imgur.com/a/ljsDOqt

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Captainbfv
Allegiant
41
07-21-2020 07:46 AM
AirBear
Sun Country
4
02-06-2020 04:43 AM
TonyWilliams
Foreign
116
07-30-2018 07:55 AM
av8tordude
Allegiant
4087
09-19-2015 08:30 PM
Uncle Wurmy
Allegiant
52
03-10-2014 05:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices