Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Spread the Money Around AA/WO >

Spread the Money Around AA/WO

Search

Notices

Spread the Money Around AA/WO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2017 | 03:29 AM
  #21  
billyho's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bob Loblaw
The WO airlines determine who they hire, and seniority determines who flows. Survive their gauntlet long enough, you get to go to AA.
Yep, plus we got more to worry about going forward into our next contract.
Reply
Old 10-18-2017 | 01:32 PM
  #22  
Child of the Magenta
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: 737
Default

Maybe when first year pay was at pre-JCBA levels guys were taking pretty big hits coming over, but now it’s like $90 an hour. I’m not feeling too much sympathy for a guy coming into that.

I think when the question of getting seniority numbers comes up, you need to ask yourself, how does that benefit AAG and/or the pilots of American? If we make it so that pilots at the regional level have numbers and transition to mainline jets with that seniority, we will be far and away the last choice for military pilots and others transitioning from non-regional airlines. If we tack your largest RJs into our group one, the cost advantages to the company are lost, and who will fly to Peoria and in what?

I’m not trying to rain on your parade, but handing out seniority numbers really only benefits one of the three groups in this equation.
Reply
Old 10-18-2017 | 02:00 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LuckyNow
Maybe when first year pay was at pre-JCBA levels guys were taking pretty big hits coming over, but now it’s like $90 an hour. I’m not feeling too much sympathy for a guy coming into that.

I think when the question of getting seniority numbers comes up, you need to ask yourself, how does that benefit AAG and/or the pilots of American? If we make it so that pilots at the regional level have numbers and transition to mainline jets with that seniority, we will be far and away the last choice for military pilots and others transitioning from non-regional airlines. If we tack your largest RJs into our group one, the cost advantages to the company are lost, and who will fly to Peoria and in what?

I’m not trying to rain on your parade, but handing out seniority numbers really only benefits one of the three groups in this equation.

I couldn't agree with you more. I personally think wholly owned pilots should have a preferential interview versus just coming over. Seems like we (AA) is passing on a lot of great pilots by limiting new hire slots. It's simple, if you work for a wholly owned carrier, you don't apply, you don't do the first day of interviews (computer stuff), you simple go in for day 2 and do the face to face. Go through the same review board as all the street hires have.
Reply
Old 10-18-2017 | 02:13 PM
  #24  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Joliet
Would AA mainline pilots be onboard with spreading this supposed $25/hour raise for JUST wholly-owned pilots across all AA/WO Pilots if let’s say something like seniority numbers were offered to the WO pilots instead of the “flow through.”

We have guys flowing from the WO to AA taking 50-60k paycuts as it is. I’d rather see the money spread across all seats not just the express/wholly-owned ones.

Reference Endeavor/Delta TA for pay raise (where is this money coming from)

Full disclosure, I am a WO pilot, about 10 years.
Have you been drug tested lately?
Reply
Old 10-18-2017 | 03:15 PM
  #25  
Sheg0theD's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Default Spread the Money Around AA/WO

So what’s the attraction of a military guy over a guy who has busted his balls in a 121 format who may actually have CRM( no offense Single seat drivers) . I have nothing against military guys, ( I have flown with many competent fantastic stick military guys and some
Not so good) but I know a bunch of 121/135 guys who have 5000TT 3000 jet pic world wide experience and yet can’t get a call for an interview at a Major.. granted I am just another AWG ( Average White Guy) who meets the quals like everyone else. So for someone like me Envoy was my only option to get in the right direction of a “Flow” with the hopes of going to mainline prior to the flow.

(Yes I have a clean record and no failed checkrides.. however I don’t have a degree and still to this day I don’t see how a psychology degree makes someone more desired then flying experience)

I also mean no disrespect to our service men who serve for our freedom, but mil guys can literally name what major they want to go.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 10-18-2017 | 03:23 PM
  #26  
Rawhide16's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sheg0theD
So what’s the attraction of a military guy over a guy who has busted his balls in a 121 format who may actually have CRM. I have nothing against military guys, ( I have flown with many competent fantastic stick military guys and some
Not so good) but I know a bunch of 121/135 guys who have 5000TT 3000 jet pic world wide experience and yet can’t get a call for an interview at a Major.. granted I am just another AWG ( Average White Guy) who meets the quals like everyone else. So for someone like me Envoy was my only option to get in the right direction of a “Flow” with the hopes of going to mainline prior to the flow.

(Yes I have a clean record and no failed checkrides.. however I don’t have a degree and still to this day I don’t see how a psychology degree makes someone more desired then flying experience)
Are you implying that mil folks don't have CRM experience?

Unfortunately, your opinion regarding the importance of a degree means jack. The airlines are the ones that do the hiring and they seem to find some value in a college degree or else they wouldn't require/desire it. Until they change their mind, you will likely be waiting for a call. I'm not saying I agree or disagree with the degree but they're obviously not having much trouble finding qualified people with one. When they start having trouble finding people with a degree then maybe they'll change their mind.
Reply
Old 10-18-2017 | 03:27 PM
  #27  
Sheg0theD's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Default Spread the Money Around AA/WO

Originally Posted by aviator77
Are you implying that mil folks don't have CRM experience?



Unfortunately, your opinion regarding the importance of a degree doesn't mean jack. The airlines are the ones that do the hiring and they seem to find some value in a college degree or else they wouldn't require/desire it. Until they change their mind, you will likely be waiting for a call. I'm not saying I agree or disagree with the degree but they're obviously not having much trouble finding qualified people with one.


I hinted at the lack of CRM for the single seat guys. I only say this out of personal experience. I am not saying all mil guys lack CRM.

I agree my opinion means nothing... Maybe one day I can convince them a degree means nothing in our profession..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 10-18-2017 | 03:36 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sheg0theD
I hinted at the lack of CRM for the single seat guys. I only say this out of personal experience. I am not saying all mil guys lack CRM.

I agree my opinion means nothing... Maybe one day I can convince them a degree means nothing in our profession..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You don't think single seat fighters use CRM? And your personal experience is based on flying at Envoy?
Reply
Old 10-18-2017 | 03:45 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,195
Likes: 42
From: Gear slinger
Default

Originally Posted by Flying101
I couldn't agree with you more. I personally think wholly owned pilots should have a preferential interview versus just coming over. Seems like we (AA) is passing on a lot of great pilots by limiting new hire slots. It's simple, if you work for a wholly owned carrier, you don't apply, you don't do the first day of interviews (computer stuff), you simple go in for day 2 and do the face to face. Go through the same review board as all the street hires have.
That would actually make regional flying more expensive for AA... instead of folks all exiting under the 12 CA/ 4 FO pay scale they would create professional regional pilots that are long term and expensive. Additionally AA would have to continue to be an industry leader in pay at its WOs to staff (both features of endeavor, and both things AAG has sought to move away from in recent contract negotiations with its WO pilot groups).

The flow is designed to keep AAs Wholly Owned regionals staffed as cost effectively as possible in order to keep its domestic routing profitable. Don’t think for one minute AA cares about who is sitting in the seats of their aircraft as long as they’re qualified and safe.

AA is one of the most competitive airlines to get into OTS because of the flow. If they decide to give seniority #s to the WO pilots they’re not going to worry about turning folks off to applying to them OTS. Plenty still will apply because at the end of the day you can make as much sitting in the right seat at AA as you would in the left seat at a lot of places and the allure of working for a Legacy. AAG will just encourage more folks to come work for the AA WO and double down on that being the path to a garaunteed seniority # at AA.

AA giving WO pilots seniority #s will help both WO recruitment and retention (folks will be less likely to leave to DAL, SWA, UAL etc of they know their seniority# they get as a WO pilot will afford them Better retirement standings at retirement if they stick it out for a few more years flying an RJ).

It wouldn’t surprise me if AAG offered its WO pilots mainline seniority#s in exchange for PBS and more cost efficiencies in salaries/benefits after the current 10 year flow agreements expire in the early 2020s... if the economy hasn’t tanked again by then to decrease pilot hiring elsewhere.
Reply
Old 10-18-2017 | 03:46 PM
  #30  
Sheg0theD's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mover
You don't think single seat fighters use CRM? And your personal experience is based on flying at Envoy?


I predominantly have a 135 background.

I knew I would get lashed out at for that statement... my point was not to bash mil guys or fighter pilots. Why does a mil guy get preference then a civilian who has more experience in a sense of flying?

For example:

Single seat fighter will get hired on at a mainline carrier with 1500 total time.. (yes I know a majority of his time is all turbine PiC)


Civilian 5000 hours 3000 jet pic multiple crossings and world wide experience. Radio Silent.


The Mil guy is more attractive on paper then the civilian. Why?








Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dckozak
FedEx
11
08-19-2016 05:56 AM
gzsg
Delta
0
07-06-2015 10:48 AM
Cargo Man
Money Talk
63
08-22-2010 04:46 AM
SWAjet
Major
32
02-26-2006 03:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices