Republic Airline Unilateral JS Action
#744
Basically more first world problems. You get a box of sh1T sent to your doorstep and whatever threads you keep they charge you for it. I’ll continue wearing my 20 year old clothes while I am smiling as the Uzingers and Allen Bros boxes show up every other month.
#745
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Cujo, you've repeatedly stated the premise that relationship status should have no bearing on JS priority. Including in the thread in the Delta section that you started. But, combined with the fact that you don't work for AA (but presumably at Envoy/PSA/PDT), this means that your airline should also be considered OAL at the same priority as, say, Mesa and Jetblue.
I pointed this out a while ago and you didn't address it so I figured that you dropped that line of argument when you saw that it undermines your own position at a AA WO. But you raised it again, so, I thought I'd point out the problem with it again. Maybe it got lost in the clutter when the thread was very fast-moving.
I pointed this out a while ago and you didn't address it so I figured that you dropped that line of argument when you saw that it undermines your own position at a AA WO. But you raised it again, so, I thought I'd point out the problem with it again. Maybe it got lost in the clutter when the thread was very fast-moving.
#746
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 467
Republic Airline Unilateral JS Action
Cujo, you've repeatedly stated the premise that relationship status should have no bearing on JS priority. Including in the thread in the Delta section that you started. But, combined with the fact that you don't work for AA (but presumably at Envoy/PSA/PDT), this means that your airline should also be considered OAL at the same priority as, say, Mesa and Jetblue.
I pointed this out a while ago and you didn't address it so I figured that you dropped that line of argument when you saw that it undermines your own position at a AA WO. But you raised it again, so, I thought I'd point out the problem with it again. Maybe it got lost in the clutter when the thread was very fast-moving.
I pointed this out a while ago and you didn't address it so I figured that you dropped that line of argument when you saw that it undermines your own position at a AA WO. But you raised it again, so, I thought I'd point out the problem with it again. Maybe it got lost in the clutter when the thread was very fast-moving.
Being WO puts us directly under the AA umbrella as we do solely AA flying and that’s the agreement set forth by APA, ALPA, and AAG management. You can’t compare us to MESA, Gojet, etc.
That doesn’t make us better than anyone but that’s just how it’s structured. His point I think is because we are committed to one airline, that should be how it is.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#747
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 200
How could I forget? A good cell phone holster is absolutely outstanding. The bigger the phone, the better the holster looks.
#748
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,533
Cujo, you've repeatedly stated the premise that relationship status should have no bearing on JS priority. Including in the thread in the Delta section that you started. But, combined with the fact that you don't work for AA (but presumably at Envoy/PSA/PDT), this means that your airline should also be considered OAL at the same priority as, say, Mesa and Jetblue.
I pointed this out a while ago and you didn't address it so I figured that you dropped that line of argument when you saw that it undermines your own position at a AA WO. But you raised it again, so, I thought I'd point out the problem with it again. Maybe it got lost in the clutter when the thread was very fast-moving.
I pointed this out a while ago and you didn't address it so I figured that you dropped that line of argument when you saw that it undermines your own position at a AA WO. But you raised it again, so, I thought I'd point out the problem with it again. Maybe it got lost in the clutter when the thread was very fast-moving.
He’s a super sharp guy.
#749
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
His point I think is because we are committed to one airline, that should be how it is.
#750
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 239
I didn't give an opinion about what the agreement is, or should be. I only addressed the consequences of his reasoning. I personally quite like WO's having priority.
Sure, but his point (multiple times) is also at the same time the opposite, that relationships should not increase priority.
Sure, but his point (multiple times) is also at the same time the opposite, that relationships should not increase priority.
WO pilots also receive an AAG paycheck just like American pilots. In no way are WOs in the same situation as non-AAG owned regionals.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post