Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Tell Me Doug Isn't Looking For a Free Ride >

Tell Me Doug Isn't Looking For a Free Ride

Search
Notices

Tell Me Doug Isn't Looking For a Free Ride

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2012, 05:21 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Default

Originally Posted by Dolphinflyer View Post
"The FAA has nothing to do with VP Ops selection. John Hale replaced "The Clerk" Hetterman, the most spineless do nothing CP we've ever seen. "


Just tying bits and pieces of intel from different sources. Of course they don't officially have anything to do with the hiring of the VP.

Maybe they didn't, but the current jr VP birdman was told by a senior VP fine collector that he was "out" of the running. After lunch with OurPay, he as called later by the Senior VP fine collector and congratulated on his promotion to Chief iPad cheerleader.

Ourpay was never that smart or a good leader. He was forced by somebody to make a change.

Maybe Tomahawk could tell us the brilliance of making a Domestic FO a Chief Pilot where they fly B777's. I'm sure the questions about Siberian diverts were fielded with the utmost knowledge. Same went for a clueless fool at a tropical crewbase. That kind of stuff got the Federales attention and enough was enough.

Oh, and also, ask Tomahawk how close AA got to the Federales OKC guillotine.
I not sure sure I get your apparent disdain for Senior FO's as chief pilots. Most of the negotiation committee of comprised of FO's. Are FO's talented enough to be there but not work in the flight office?

In the course of my career, I've seen great leaders step forward whether captain or FO.

As to the issue of AA's relationship with the FAA, I think we have a good one, but you'll have to ask others in the know their opinion.

Cheers
Tomahawk58 is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 08:10 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Speaking French
Posts: 385
Default

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58 View Post
I not sure sure I get your apparent disdain for Senior FO's as chief pilots. Most of the negotiation committee of comprised of FO's. Are FO's talented enough to be there but not work in the flight office?

In the course of my career, I've seen great leaders step forward whether captain or FO.

As to the issue of AA's relationship with the FAA, I think we have a good one, but you'll have to ask others in the know their opinion.

Cheers
Maybe I'm missing something here. I used to be a chief pilot at a 121 commuter and if I remember correctly, you have to have been a captain previously. The FAA requires something like three years of prior PIC 121 in type. We even required our sim check airman to be captains prior, but that was a company not FAA requirement. I've never heard of an FO chief pilot.

G
GQpilot is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 08:15 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Default

Originally Posted by GQpilot View Post
Maybe I'm missing something here. I used to be a chief pilot at a 121 commuter and if I remember correctly, you have to have been a captain previously. The FAA requires something like three years if I remember correctly. We even required our sim check airman to be captains prior, but that was a company not FAA requirement. I've never heard of an FO chief pilot.

G
Let make sure we're on the same page. The reference is to our base chief pilots around the system not the VP of Flight. Most of our chief are captains but we've also brought in some senior FOs over the past few years.

I believe you're referring to the Chief Pilot who serves in the 119 designated position at a Part 121 Air Carrier.
Tomahawk58 is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 08:23 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Speaking French
Posts: 385
Default

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58 View Post
Let make sure we're on the same page. The reference is to our base chief pilots around the system not the VP of Flight. Most of our chief are captains but we've also brought in some senior FOs over the past few years.

I believe you're referring to the Chief Pilot who serves in the 119 designated position at a Part 121 Air Carrier.
I get it, thanks for the clarification. We had a Director of Flight Ops, followed by a Chief pilot, Assistant Chief Pilot, and in the case of DFW a base Chief Pilot. That was a long time ago. I remember flying out of DFW for 6 months back when Delta was there, complete madhouse with all the traffic.

G
GQpilot is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 08:40 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Default

Originally Posted by GQpilot View Post
I get it, thanks for the clarification. We had a Director of Flight Ops, followed by a Chief pilot, Assistant Chief Pilot, and in the case of DFW a base Chief Pilot. That was a long time ago. I remember flying out of DFW for 6 months back when Delta was there, complete madhouse with all the traffic.

G
You're welcome. I completely agree on the days when DAL had a big presence here at DFW. Very busy but quite exciting times actually !
Tomahawk58 is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 01:50 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Godzilla's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 188
Default

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58 View Post
As you said earlier, we'll have to wait and see the lbo. I just think Mr. Parker is a sleaze for trying to do this on the backs of AAer's and his own team. Who's the real opportunist here? Rhetorical of course......it's Doug!!!!

I'll also add that I don't think much of the union presidents for attending a competitor's shareholder's meeting. Well beyond the treachery line in my opinion! I mean when is the last time anyone saw pilots, FAs or other union leadership sitting in the shareholder meeting of a competitor?

While not desired behavior I do not see either one of the above transgressions as being near as despicable as being a shill for a dirtbag company like AA.
Godzilla is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 02:01 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Godzilla's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 188
Default

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58 View Post
So, outside of a small pay raise, what's the benefit to AAer's. With a combined pilot group numbering 15,000, where the growth? The only movement as I see it will be due to attrition. Where is the upside? We would actually move into a sustained contraction phase and not growth!

I fail to see how this is any different than what AAmerican has been doing for the past decade.
Amazing how American pilots always expect benefits at everyone else's expense.
Godzilla is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 02:16 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Default

Originally Posted by Godzilla View Post
I fail to see how this is any different than what AAmerican has been doing for the past decade.
Amazing how American pilots always expect benefits at everyone else's expense.
You see that's just it, I neither expect nor want anything from any outside entity! AA has and will continue to prevail. Thanks for the kind compliment, I am proud to be a rabid supporter of my company.

AAer for life and proud to be so !!
Tomahawk58 is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 02:51 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
7576FO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: 737 CA MIA
Posts: 1,042
Default

AA's mangement team must be really really bad when even Mitch turns on them!
I'm not really in favor of a AA/US merge, as I am in favor of removing your buddy Tom Horton and friends. IT is time for them to go.
7576FO


US Airways brings the fight to DFW
Posted Wednesday, Jun. 20, 2012
BY MITCHELL SCHNURMAN
[email protected]

It's not personal; it's just management.

And it's one reason that US Airways' CEO Doug Parker is being treated as if he's riding to the rescue.

Parker came to North Texas on Monday to make his case for a merger with American Airlines. He brought along American's three union chiefs and their unconditional endorsements, met with newspapers in Fort Worth and Dallas, and also made the TV news.

It takes chutzpah to bring a road show into American's hometown, especially while American execs are fighting for their professional lives. But it also takes nerve to go after a rival that's almost twice as large and to strike a deal with the unions right under their corporate parent's nose.

With Parker and US Airways, you can't rule out anything, and that's part of their appeal. These are the upstarts who have changed the conversation, the risk-takers who want to change the game.

They're willing to bet the company on a plan to create the world's largest airline, even if it takes years to combine unions, fleets and computer systems. Standing pat is no way to get ahead, and swinging for the fences at least inspires people.

Labor leaders said they embraced Parker's plan because it offers a vision for the future. They acknowledged that a merger wouldn't be a panacea, because their members still face concessionary contracts. But the cuts wouldn't be as deep, giving them a fighting chance against the United-Continental and Delta-Northwest combinations.

In contrast, American management has proposed staying the course and building up its "cornerstone" strategy to expand in five crucial business hubs. Its plan depends largely on lowering labor costs, which sounds a lot like 2003.

American's lack of imagination has opened the door wide for Parker, who learned from his failed overtures to Delta and United. He's going for American early, and he's going hard -- locking up the unions first and then talking to bondholders. On Monday, he hit the media in DFW and then visited lawmakers in Washington.

He's keeping US Airways' merger talk top-of-mind, even with the bankruptcy judge scheduled to rule on American labor contracts Friday.

American CEO Tom Horton eventually said he's willing to consider a merger, but the comment came so late that it sounded reluctant. In theory, American execs could lead a merger after Chapter 11, but would their heart be in it?

"You got to want the people that think it's a good idea to do it," Parker told the Star-Telegram.

Labor leaders said they would back the US Airways team, even if American matches its contract offer. It's not just the merger that won them over; it's Parker's plan to share the gains.

He estimates that a merger will produce $1.2 billion in added revenue and cost savings. He wants to use that to pay for new labor contracts and to pay off bondholders, so the merged company is the one that emerges from bankruptcy.

Horton has said that a stand-alone American can add billions, too, by growing the cornerstone markets and cutting labor costs. American doesn't see much gain from adding US Airways, and eventually, the bankruptcy court will decide which plan is more credible.

Parker said he is confident that no other reorganization could produce as much value because the combined network would be so much larger. American's stand-alone strategy can't close the gap with United and Delta, he said.

"It can only be fixed one way: through a merger with US Airways. But the good news is it can be fixed, and can be fixed like that," Parker said, snapping his fingers.

Mergers often bring changes in management, too. United is now led by Jeff Smisek, previously CEO of Continental. Delta CEO Richard Anderson spent 14 years at Northwest, three as CEO. Parker was CEO of America West when it merged with US Airways, and America West had one-third the revenue and less than half as many employees.

The upshot is that the biggest companies don't own all the talent or the ideas. And there's an argument that American management has played it too safe for too long. When Southwest Airlines agreed to buy AirTran in late 2010, that was a signal that organic growth would be hard to come by. Yet American stuck with the cornerstones and hasn't budged much in bankruptcy.

American still has to submit a reorganization plan, and so does US Airways, if it's allowed to do so. That could happen in July or August, and details will be scrutinized. How would US Airways make a profit if it's paying a higher rate to American workers and bumping up its own low-paid staff? How would it merge seniority lists?

American's plan will face skeptics too. Many doubt that American can pick up market share in the most competitive cities, where it's losing ground.

Union leaders said they didn't back US Airways because of personality conflicts at American. Even Parker touched on that subject, saying he is friends with American execs and had worked with them. It isn't personal, he said.

"This is about a model that's better," Parker said.

How do you separate that from the management team that championed it?

Mitchell Schnurman's column appears Sundays and Thursdays. 817-390-7821
7576FO is offline  
Old 06-21-2012, 03:13 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Default

So both Messrs Horton and Parker have their MBAs and got their early start in the finance department of American Airlines. Both have gone on to do different things before arriving in their current roles. Mr Parker has been in his role for quite a while and has tried every permutation to merge with one of the big guys, while his own company remains fractured within its employee groups. Mr Horton has been in his role for just over six months. I'm placing my bet on Tom as someone with the vision and passion to move AA forward in positive ways.

AAer for life and proud to be so .

Last edited by Tomahawk58; 06-21-2012 at 03:36 PM.
Tomahawk58 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ChinookDriver47
Aviation Law
56
12-04-2009 03:52 PM
saviboy
Major
22
10-19-2009 05:09 PM
IPAMD11FO
Major
71
08-09-2008 03:47 AM
jsfBoat
Flight Schools and Training
12
06-24-2008 07:52 PM
mmontfort
Flight Schools and Training
0
04-14-2007 04:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices