Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
How is the operation running? >

How is the operation running?

Notices

How is the operation running?

Old 09-16-2012, 06:39 AM
  #11  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by aa73 View Post
About 80% of the initial term sheet and 20% of the "LBFO."

Pretty ugly, but we who voted No expected the full term sheet. It's gonna be ugly for a short while but I fully expect we will eventually end up with an ILC.

They are about to implement "overfly shall be cancelled by underfly" policy. Gee, wonder how pilots will get around that? My understanding is that NWA tried that and their pilots started "BOB" (Block Or Better) and management stopped it shortly thereafter.
Well ya know sometimes you have to double check that flight plan. Especially on those RNAV departures. You don't want to cause a potential mid air collision. Safety first.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 07:53 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ForeverFO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 737
Default

It continues to amaze me how management continues to assume we'll start sucking our thumbs, crying quietly, and simply crawl back into our little cockpits, flying as usual under those horrendous terms. "Guys, we lost. The judge said so. Let's just give up and be thankful."

The money lost in the upcoming months by AMR would go a long way towards paying for a decent contract. But they'd rather see us suffer. Instead of negotiating after the NO vote, what we are seeing is simply punishment.
ForeverFO is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 08:17 AM
  #13  
AAmerican Way for AA Pay
 
B757200ER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: B-737 Pilot
Posts: 1,617
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
Well ya know sometimes you have to double check that flight plan. Especially on those RNAV departures. You don't want to cause a potential mid air collision. Safety first.
Instead of DIRECT anywhere, just request "FLIGHT PLAN ROUTE"!
B757200ER is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 08:33 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 945
Default

How's the operation running? With the help of make up flyers...

Disgraceful.
Mink is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 11:36 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DashDriverYV's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: back in the right
Posts: 406
Default

Here in DFW the operation seems to be orange. Accurate?
DashDriverYV is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 11:42 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ForeverFO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 737
Default

Originally Posted by Mink View Post
How's the operation running? With the help of make up flyers...

Disgraceful.
I've been averaging maybe 66 hours a month for over a decade. In 20 years I have not taken a single make-up trip. Not one. I fly my line, usually less than my line.

But yeah there are make-up guys. I cannot condemn them all, because each and every one has a different motivation. I know one guy whose wife is terminal AND he's taking care of his aging (and incoherent/alzheimer) mother. The guy needs the $$. Many examples of life situations where there is little other option.

But those that are still doing it because they need the bux for their new boat payment - pi$$ off to you.

One of the problems we'll face is the inevitable, shrill "STATUS QUO! STATUS QUO!" that will come from management in federal court. I'm still baffled at how judges think they can force guys to fly overtime. Last I heard, slavery was abolished in the USA.
ForeverFO is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 01:56 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TANSTAAFL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Still in one
Posts: 784
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
Well ya know sometimes you have to double check that flight plan. Especially on those RNAV departures. You don't want to cause a potential mid air collision. Safety first.
And NWA took the MEC to court for a cease and desist and lost because the MEC had taken great pains to tell pilots not to do anything unprofessional. They also got lucky. Both AMR and UAL have lost on that count before. Also in NWA's case it had more to do with a ridiculously draconian SL policy together with a even more ridiculously unrealistic staffing formula that left the operation running at redline with no flex. Recall the fix was to change the SL policy.
TANSTAAFL is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 02:04 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rolf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 655
Default

For you lawyer types,

The burden of proof rests with the company to show a work slowdown is taking place? It seems that as long as the union isn't involved in any way, it would be hard to find them quilty of same.

Best of luck,

Rolf
Rolf is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 03:04 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Default

Originally Posted by flyallnite View Post
Withholding of enthusiasm is not a job action. Neither is taking time off if one is unfit to fly. It is hard to run an operation when you crap all over your frontline employees. But what did they expect? Leadership starts at the top and they've removed every incentive to perform. Hopefully the creditors will tube the current mgmt when they see the wheels come off.
I completely agree and your opinion would seem to encourage rational behavior. Sadly,however, given the U.S. corporate culture, the RLA, and by judging what happened when the USAirways pilots lost "enthusiasm", the creditors will most likely give Horton an "attaboy!" The courts will back Horton and punish labor and no one in either our government or our citizenry will see the need for change.
justjack is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 03:21 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Default

Originally Posted by ForeverFO View Post
It continues to amaze me how management continues to assume we'll start sucking our thumbs, crying quietly, and simply crawl back into our little cockpits, flying as usual under those horrendous terms. "Guys, we lost. The judge said so. Let's just give up and be thankful."

The money lost in the upcoming months by AMR would go a long way towards paying for a decent contract. But they'd rather see us suffer. Instead of negotiating after the NO vote, what we are seeing is simply punishment.
This is not a rhetorical question. Haven't these tactics on the part of airline management been completely successful in the past? Is there anything else left to do, legally, except walk away from the profession or take what management offers? Are these management teams significantly different from Lorenzo and Icahn?
justjack is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CitationJason
Part 135
52
06-22-2017 12:29 PM
DAL 88 Driver
Money Talk
27
11-03-2011 05:32 AM
CEFO
Pilot Health
1
01-01-2011 07:45 AM
Grumble
Pilot Health
39
12-02-2010 08:04 AM
b744man
Cargo
2
07-31-2006 07:20 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread