Search

Notices

AOL update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2014 | 01:27 PM
  #2781  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
the full jest of what the east is doing and have done.

WD at AWA
The full jest?

ER called and asked me to please stop interacting with you. Now that you have posted that you are a product of their university their inquiries are way down.
Reply
Old 02-18-2014 | 02:01 PM
  #2782  
captfred's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: Retired for now
Default

The Emergency Room called?
Reply
Old 02-18-2014 | 02:55 PM
  #2783  
Wiskey Driver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainBigWood
Whiskey, West pilots are flying 30% of former East routes. According to your definition that makes the West group your favorite word,
Scabs
Lets look at it like this woodrow, we never made a deal with you and then went back on that deal! We don't refer to express pilots as that just because the company decides to give them some of our flying. The east agreed to go to arbitration AND abide by what ever the results. The results came out and you tore down the union and have been terrorizing the west since. Now it my hope that APA does you the very same way.

WD at AWA
Reply
Old 02-18-2014 | 02:58 PM
  #2784  
Wiskey Driver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
The full jest?

ER called and asked me to please stop interacting with you. Now that you have posted that you are a product of their university their inquiries are way down.
hahahahahah ok its been a while

WD at AWA
Reply
Old 02-18-2014 | 02:59 PM
  #2785  
Wiskey Driver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by captfred
The Emergency Room called?
ER Embry Riddle

WD at AWA
Reply
Old 02-18-2014 | 03:16 PM
  #2786  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Somebody needs a new toy.
Reply
Old 02-18-2014 | 04:44 PM
  #2787  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: A330 capt
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
She found your posts humorous, because of the poor quality. She is laughing at you, not with you. A narcissist would see it as you do though.

What's this? You showed her more than one of my posts? Why is that R? Were you unsure of their quality? Not sure if some of them were "actually" amusing or in reasonably good taste? Not able to make that aesthetic judgement yourself? Never been accused of having an excessively broad sense of humor, have you?

If your posts are for your own amusement and for praise from your dim witted, WD fan club-mission accomplished. IF your goal was to actually communicate your thoughts-fail.

Oh jeez, R, pardon me for having a little fun...And until you admit that trading artful insults is fun, then we'll have to continue on this line, R.

One thing would help immensely, drop the .........

Ah, the real source of your angst, the ellipsis...come on R, that's my thing, man, -my "bag"...my shtick...ask your daughter, it gives certain writers a sense of style, a flow...a rhythm...a nuanced continuity to their prose. But if, for an opponent, it results in a grinding irritation, an aggravating, vexatious, subliminal distress...the maddening...drip...drip...drip...of Chinese water torture, then so much the better, I say.

Now, back to the topic. Want to answer my question?
Ok:

Premise:

Self-evident rule #1: Only those pilots with flying jobs at their airlines are actual employees of their airlines.

Self-evident rule #2: In the event of a merger, the actual employees of one company are merged with the actual employees of their merger partner.

Condition 1: America West and USAir airlines were to be merged.

Condition 2: America West had only pilots with flying jobs who were actual employees.

Condition 3: USAir had pilots with flying jobs who were actual employees and- USAir had pilots without flying jobs who were not actual employees.

Apply self-evident rule #2

Inevitable, necessary, geometrically logical, self-consistent, compelling, legitimate and legal result:

"The Nicolau Award"
Reply
Old 02-18-2014 | 08:39 PM
  #2788  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by wiggy
Ok:

Premise:

Self-evident rule #1: Only those pilots with flying jobs at their airlines are actual employees of their airlines.

Self-evident rule #2: In the event of a merger, the actual employees of one company are merged with the actual employees of their merger partner.

Condition 1: America West and USAir airlines were to be merged.

Condition 2: America West had only pilots with flying jobs who were actual employees.

Condition 3: USAir had pilots with flying jobs who were actual employees and- USAir had pilots without flying jobs who were not actual employees.

Apply self-evident rule #2

Inevitable, necessary, geometrically logical, self-consistent, compelling, legitimate and legal result:

"The Nicolau Award"
Once again you are wrong. Go to cactuspilot.com. There you can find a copy of the Nicolau Opinion and Award. Actually read it and see if you can find your error. I'll give you a clue-who was working when?
Reply
Old 02-18-2014 | 11:13 PM
  #2789  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: A330 capt
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
Once again you are wrong. Go to cactuspilot.com. There you can find a copy of the Nicolau Opinion and Award. Actually read it and see if you can find your error. I'll give you a clue-who was working when?
Jeez...you must think I'm Sherlock Holmes with that clue. This is such a fun game, rather than just tell me why I'm in "error", let's drag this out by making me dig for it. That way when I discover it on my own, I'll receive some kind of error-correcting epiphany.

Who was working when?....-Not wanting to go to the actual trouble of finding a copy of the Nic, let me run that through the old permutation/iteration/speculation computer:

All AWA pilots were working at the time of the merger. Ding)))

Not all USAir pilots were working at the time of the merger. Ding)))

The term "time of the merger" seems vague. Ding)))

Some portion of furloughed USAir pilots were expected to be recalled between the time of merger announcement and the announcement of the Nic, creating a certain demographic instability in status and expectations for any contemplated seniority lists during arbitration. Ding)))

In an uncertain, changing demographic environment, an arbitrary point in time must be chosen so as to eliminate the aforementioned instabilities and uncertainties, -a logical point in time chosen so as to fix the status and expectations of those involved. Such logical point in time is traditionally "date of announcement of the merger". Ding))) Ding)))

The status and expectations of all pilots involved were frozen as of the aforementioned "date of announcement of the merger" Ding))))

The seniority list was constructed based on the status and expectations of those involved frozen at the aforementioned date. Ding)))

The USAir pilots were not happy with their status and expectations being frozen on said date. Ding)))

The arbitrators could hardly be expected to change such status and expectations on a day-to-day basis as the arbitration proceeded. ding)))

The arbitrator, not being expected to change such status and category for said USAir pilots in such ongoing process...didn't make such changes. ding)))

Result: The Nicolau Award. Logically based on actual number of pilots working at date of merger announcement.

End of program....
Reply
Old 02-19-2014 | 05:18 AM
  #2790  
Wiskey Driver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by wiggy
Jeez...you must think I'm Sherlock Holmes with that clue. This is such a fun game, rather than just tell me why I'm in "error", let's drag this out by making me dig for it. That way when I discover it on my own, I'll receive some kind of error-correcting epiphany.

Who was working when?....-Not wanting to go to the actual trouble of finding a copy of the Nic, let me run that through the old permutation/iteration/speculation computer:

All AWA pilots were working at the time of the merger. Ding)))

Not all USAir pilots were working at the time of the merger. Ding)))

The term "time of the merger" seems vague. Ding)))

Some portion of furloughed USAir pilots were expected to be recalled between the time of merger announcement and the announcement of the Nic, creating a certain demographic instability in status and expectations for any contemplated seniority lists during arbitration. Ding)))

In an uncertain, changing demographic environment, an arbitrary point in time must be chosen so as to eliminate the aforementioned instabilities and uncertainties, -a logical point in time chosen so as to fix the status and expectations of those involved. Such logical point in time is traditionally "date of announcement of the merger". Ding))) Ding)))

The status and expectations of all pilots involved were frozen as of the aforementioned "date of announcement of the merger" Ding))))

The seniority list was constructed based on the status and expectations of those involved frozen at the aforementioned date. Ding)))

The USAir pilots were not happy with their status and expectations being frozen on said date. Ding)))

The arbitrators could hardly be expected to change such status and expectations on a day-to-day basis as the arbitration proceeded. ding)))

The arbitrator, not being expected to change such status and category for said USAir pilots in such ongoing process...didn't make such changes. ding)))

Result: The Nicolau Award. Logically based on actual number of pilots working at date of merger announcement.

End of program....
Now you know good and damn well that is far too much fact for any east usapa koolaid drinker much less realy. These are facts and we all know that does not play well in usapa land.

WD at AWA
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gettinbumped
United
0
12-11-2012 11:29 AM
cactiboss
American
29
05-16-2012 06:24 PM
LifeNtheFstLne
United
51
11-16-2010 11:47 AM
HSLD
Hiring News
2
11-14-2006 04:32 PM
HSLD
Hiring News
1
02-08-2006 10:37 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices