Search

Notices

AOL update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2013 | 08:15 PM
  #351  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default

Well this kind of makes sense. Supp CC is part of the Cba at amr so the fact that Judge lane retains jurisdiction is plausible. Now usapa who has no standing in amr's bankruptcy suing the west class who also has no standing is beyond nuts (remember the west lawsuit is only after amr exits its bankruptcy case). Then again Judge Lane has already denied usapa's attempted at involving itself in amr's bankruptcy last year, he is well versed on them.
Reply
Old 03-07-2013 | 05:11 AM
  #352  
Flies With The Hat On
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: Right of the Left Seat
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Well this kind of makes sense. Supp CC is part of the Cba at amr so the fact that Judge lane retains jurisdiction is plausible. Now usapa who has no standing in amr's bankruptcy suing the west class who also has no standing is beyond nuts (remember the west lawsuit is only after amr exits its bankruptcy case). Then again Judge Lane has already denied usapa's attempted at involving itself in amr's bankruptcy last year, he is well versed on them.
Stay tuned.
Reply
Old 03-07-2013 | 06:51 AM
  #353  
LittleBoyBlew's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
From: Bigg Bird!!
Default

"The merger may have sidetracked the process a bit, but JetBlue Airways president and CEO Dave Barger said Monday that his carrier is looking toward a stronger relationship with American Airlines later this year."


The stars are lining up for the grand final...DOJ will most likely request carve-outs from the "New" AA. If AOL continues with its baseless rhetoric, they might wind up as protagonists at a shotgun wedding...Just saying. It makes perfect sense..
A certain DCAir Airline scheme comes to mind. Were certain assets of the previous USA, were to be divested in order to grease the DOJ skids.
After all, the MOU is merely a handshake until the POR is approved. Anything can happen, and will happen to make this deal fit..
Reply
Old 03-07-2013 | 07:24 AM
  #354  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
I voted for it because it was seniority neutral, usapa is on video and theyre literature saying so. Now everyone knew that the west would sue if the Nic wasn't used, why are you surprised?
They also put our an update saying there was confusion on the MOU and no pilot should vote for it thinking that is would force implementation of the Nicolau award.
Reply
Old 03-07-2013 | 07:39 AM
  #355  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
They also put our an update saying there was confusion on the MOU and no pilot should vote for it thinking that is would force implementation of the Nicolau award.
Did they say it would kill the Nicolau? They went to great lengths to tell us it was neutral either way didn't they? Everyone knows usapa will never do the right thing and continue their doh jihad until apa takes over (you should be very concerned about a repeat performance by your merger committees doh or nothing stand) the fact term sheet one spelled out usapa's demise at the "earliest" time possible still says nothing to you? The west has sued no one, we simply put everyone on notice that helping usapa will get you sued. As I told you from the beginning, this was about neutering usapa and making sure they can't negotiate sli and preferably they are long gone
By the time sli arb starts.
Reply
Old 03-07-2013 | 07:54 AM
  #356  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Did they say it would kill the Nicolau? They went to great lengths to tell us it was neutral either way didn't they? Everyone knows usapa will never do the right thing and continue their doh jihad until apa takes over (you should be very concerned about a repeat performance by your merger committees doh or nothing stand) the fact term sheet one spelled out usapa's demise at the "earliest" time possible still says nothing to you? The west has sued no one, we simply put everyone on notice that helping usapa will get you sued. As I told you from the beginning, this was about neutering usapa and making sure they can't negotiate sli and preferably they are long gone
By the time sli arb starts.
Now think about it cacti. With your opinion of USAPA, what do you think "neutral" means to them?

You don't think they will be the CBA that starts the SLI process? The ones that hand over the data?
Reply
Old 03-07-2013 | 08:11 AM
  #357  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
Now think about it cacti. With your opinion of USAPA, what do you think "neutral" means to them?
Are you saying usapa is a lying cheating organization that can't be trusted? I know what it means to "them" and I don't care, it only matters what a court says it means. Look everyone is very aware of who usapa is by now.
You don't think they will be the CBA that starts the SLI process? The ones that hand over the data?
I expect them to, I also expect the apa to not accept it and run for the hills hiding until usapa is decertified. What do you think happens the second a non Nic. List is handed over?
Reply
Old 03-07-2013 | 08:16 AM
  #358  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 20
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by LittleBoyBlew
"The merger may have sidetracked the process a bit, but JetBlue Airways president and CEO Dave Barger said Monday that his carrier is looking toward a stronger relationship with American Airlines later this year."


The stars are lining up for the grand final...DOJ will most likely request carve-outs from the "New" AA....
A certain DCAir Airline scheme comes to mind. Were certain assets of the previous USA, were to be divested in order to grease the DOJ skids....
Different situation....the DCAir carve-out you allude to was a result of a landslide of opposition to the proposed 2000 US/UA merge....Congress and the DOJ were taking a dim view of the whole thing and it was not going to get approved without significant divestitures. Not the case this time. Different political situation, different industry dynamics.
Reply
Old 03-07-2013 | 09:49 AM
  #359  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by tailendcharlie
Different situation....the DCAir carve-out you allude to was a result of a landslide of opposition to the proposed 2000 US/UA merge....Congress and the DOJ were taking a dim view of the whole thing and it was not going to get approved without significant divestitures. Not the case this time. Different political situation, different industry dynamics.
Also UA controlled IAD, giving the new UA DCA and IAD. And LLCs have grown at DCA and BWI.
Reply
Old 03-07-2013 | 09:50 AM
  #360  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
What do you think happens the second a non Nic. List is handed over?
I can't imagine that mattering to them other than the affect it has on the AA side. If a negotiated SLI is not in AA's best interest then I expect them to let the process roll.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gettinbumped
United
0
12-11-2012 11:29 AM
cactiboss
American
29
05-16-2012 06:24 PM
LifeNtheFstLne
United
51
11-16-2010 11:47 AM
HSLD
Hiring News
2
11-14-2006 04:32 PM
HSLD
Hiring News
1
02-08-2006 10:37 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices