Latest UsAir out of touch SLI ideas
12-04-2013, 12:57 PM
#31
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
Whatever. Make the target as big as ya want. Make it four point instead of two. 
You just moved your goal line closer so when we split the baby, you're on our 25 instead of us meeting on the 50 yard line. Just fixed it for 'ya.
12-04-2013, 12:59 PM
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Originally Posted by eaglefly
That's how negotiations work. It's how unions and managements negotiate contracts and how you argue in arbitration. You make the "box" as small as possible for the other party that way when you meet in the middle, it's closer to your goal line.
You just moved our goal line closer so when we split the baby, you're on our 25 instead of us meeting on the 50 heard line. Just fixed it for 'ya.
You just moved our goal line closer so when we split the baby, you're on our 25 instead of us meeting on the 50 heard line. Just fixed it for 'ya.
Whatever. Really, whatever. I'll still buy you a beer someday.
12-04-2013, 02:55 PM
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
Indeed the process was laid out. It was laid out in a contract called the 2005 Transition Agreement. The courts will enforce that contract until it is nullified on Monday the 9th.
Courts do not enforce arbitration. Never have. Never will. They enforce the contracts that circumscribe the arbitration. The 2005 TA will be no more and no longer enforceable on Monday.
Cheers
Courts do not enforce arbitration. Never have. Never will. They enforce the contracts that circumscribe the arbitration. The 2005 TA will be no more and no longer enforceable on Monday.
Cheers
WD at AWA
12-04-2013, 03:00 PM
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Originally Posted by flybywire44
!
I believe APA and USAPA are working back room agreements irrespective of DOH.
Lets try to adopt a positive outlook regarding this merger.
Cheers.
I believe APA and USAPA are working back room agreements irrespective of DOH.
Lets try to adopt a positive outlook regarding this merger.
Cheers.
WD at AWA
12-04-2013, 04:00 PM
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: CA
Posts: 483
I'm not sure which group it applied to but my understanding was that in the United Continental SLI, guys that flowed up from Continental Express didn't get credit for their time at their express carrier. It's all speculation until we're crying over the final SLI.
12-04-2013, 04:49 PM
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
Wrong!!! Already made a fool of you on this subject lets not have me do it again ok?
WD at AWA
WD at AWA
Wrong!!!!
(You only used 3 "!!!". I used 4. I win.
)Next time try something other than Marty's implicit assumption strategy.
12-04-2013, 04:51 PM
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
And this is how to most certainly end up in a DFR suit. Back room deals that will most certainly harm one group? Yeah I dont see APA getting caught up in that one.
WD at AWA
WD at AWA
You guys know all about DFRs.
(The two unions are allowed to negotiate.
)
12-04-2013, 05:12 PM
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
Wrong!!! Already made a fool of you on this subject lets not have me do it again ok?
WD at AWA
WD at AWA
On man, WD you crack me up.
Thanks man, I needed that today.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
