Change in Livery
#21
If WE had a choice, a NEW livery from scratch. But given the current choice, I vote for the Classic tail. Cheaper to maintain and obvious brand recognition. Besides in a few years from now, when AA is making money, a whole different livery will most likely emerge.
In the mean time, get rid of that hideous CUBANA look alike tail!!
In the mean time, get rid of that hideous CUBANA look alike tail!!
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Pitot heat, what's to eat?
Posts: 392
Same thing with combining the old and new AA designs. It has to be one or the other. Like it not, the flag tail already represents the "New AA" to a lot of people.
#23
He also explains why they aren't willing to spend more money on a complete redesign. You can tell he hates it, but that in the end he's not going to spend a bunch of money post bankruptcy to redo something that's already been done and partially implemented so employees can feel all warm and fuzzy about their airline. It's a cop out, but it's also a financially responsible decision. Welcome to the new American.
Hopefully they get the uniforms right.
#24
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 89
I have to admit- I didn't particularly like the new paint scheme either. It first reminded me of a Cubana/Colgan identity crisis. However, after some time, it's slowly growing on me. Also, given the choices, I think a combo of the legacy scheme and the new scheme reeks. I like the old logo, but only on the old paint scheme. Given the two choices, and that a complete "redo" is out of the question, I'll be voting on the new scheme.
Hey, if Doug doesn't like it and we vote it in the scheme he dislikes in it's entirety, then perhaps this increases the odds of a "do-over" with time.
Regardless of paint scheme, I'm just looking forward to moving along and working together at the "New American". Cheers!
Hey, if Doug doesn't like it and we vote it in the scheme he dislikes in it's entirety, then perhaps this increases the odds of a "do-over" with time.
Regardless of paint scheme, I'm just looking forward to moving along and working together at the "New American". Cheers!
#26
As others have said, the alternate livery is boring and shows brand confusion. The flag tail is loud and sort of obnoxious, but it gets attention and it could be argued that the flag tail represents the US Airways addition. Barring other more original ideas, I'd go with the flag tail version.
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
I don't like the two logos on the alternate option. If it were up to me my first choice would be scrap it all. Second would be scrap the new logo and keep the tail with the old eagle in the front. Of the ones given I think I'll vote for the new look all together because the other choice looks hobbled together, almost like the PI/US transition paint schemes.
The only reason I'd vote for changing the tail would be if having the eagle on the tail was vastly less expensive. That new tail looks hard to apply and maintain.
But, whatever. I don't think passengers really care unless the paint is peeling or the airplane is dirty. Then they think that if they don't take care of the outside then maybe they don't take care of the rest of it.
I just went to wings and it's careful to say this isn't really a vote, they are just getting our input. I'm thinking we are too far in this to change. Parker doesn't like to waste money. We'll see.
The only reason I'd vote for changing the tail would be if having the eagle on the tail was vastly less expensive. That new tail looks hard to apply and maintain.
But, whatever. I don't think passengers really care unless the paint is peeling or the airplane is dirty. Then they think that if they don't take care of the outside then maybe they don't take care of the rest of it.
I just went to wings and it's careful to say this isn't really a vote, they are just getting our input. I'm thinking we are too far in this to change. Parker doesn't like to waste money. We'll see.
#29
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bellanca
Flight Schools and Training
32
02-26-2011 02:18 PM