Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
US / a320 weight restriction? >

US / a320 weight restriction?

Search

Notices

US / a320 weight restriction?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2014 | 08:06 AM
  #1  
ghilis101's Avatar
Thread Starter
La Familia Delta
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
From: B-717 FO / C-17 AC
Default US / a320 weight restriction?

US Folks,

I got left behind today on the USair PHL-LAS flight because the a320 was weight restricted and could only take 1 js in the cockpit instead of 2. The crew and gate agent were extremely nice, but they couldn't get around the restriction, and I'm grateful that they went the extra mile to try and get me on. Makes me think even more highly of you guys!

So my question is this. I always assumed airbuses could never be weight restricted, and I specifically target 2 js aircraft when I jumpseat for the extra "warm fuzzy." So now this totally changes my way of thinking. For future reference, in what scenarios are your a320's weight restricted? Thanks in advance!
Reply
Old 03-19-2014 | 08:33 AM
  #2  
Hueypilot's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 2
From: B737
Default

They can be weight restricted. Depends on the performance numbers. I'll add that a PHL-LAS run = more gas/weight, so you had that working against you.
Reply
Old 03-19-2014 | 08:39 AM
  #3  
ghilis101's Avatar
Thread Starter
La Familia Delta
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
From: B-717 FO / C-17 AC
Default

Originally Posted by Hueypilot
They can be weight restricted. Depends on the performance numbers.
Any scenarios off the top of your head? For example, RJ's become landing weight restricted when the leg is really short and the wx is bad enough that theyre carrying extra alternate fuel.

However, I cannot for the life of me explain how an a320 gets weight restricted out of PHL, going on a 4+30 flight. It can't possibly be togw restricted at sea level with a 10,000ft+ rwy on a cold day, and it cant possibly be landing weight restricted because its burning enough fuel on a long leg. Thoughts?
Reply
Old 03-19-2014 | 08:46 AM
  #4  
bigscrillywilli's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Default

Fuel contamination in Vegas
Apparently affecting all airlines

- lots of cancellations, each flight required to carry as much fuel in as possible, and any flight that can't carry enough in is in a planned fuel stop op outbound. Working around it as much as possible, but just another feather in a weird winter (now almost spring)
Reply
Old 03-19-2014 | 09:03 AM
  #5  
ghilis101's Avatar
Thread Starter
La Familia Delta
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
From: B-717 FO / C-17 AC
Default

Originally Posted by Hueypilot
They can be weight restricted. Depends on the performance numbers. I'll add that a PHL-LAS run = more gas/weight, so you had that working against you.
Ahhhh ok I see what I missed. My buddy just msged me its single engine missed capability in LAS. Good to know. Thanks guys!
Reply
Old 03-19-2014 | 09:03 AM
  #6  
ghilis101's Avatar
Thread Starter
La Familia Delta
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
From: B-717 FO / C-17 AC
Default

Originally Posted by bigscrillywilli
Fuel contamination in Vegas
Apparently affecting all airlines

- lots of cancellations, each flight required to carry as much fuel in as possible, and any flight that can't carry enough in is in a planned fuel stop op outbound. Working around it as much as possible, but just another feather in a weird winter (now almost spring)
Woah! fuel contamination?!
Reply
Old 03-19-2014 | 11:22 AM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 747
Likes: 4
From: Blue fifi flogger
Default

Originally Posted by ghilis101
Ahhhh ok I see what I missed. My buddy just msged me its single engine missed capability in LAS. Good to know. Thanks guys!
Hmm. I flew JB 320s BOS-LAS and JFK-LAS several times and our SE missed numbers were several thousand pounds greater than structural MLW. IAE engines though.
Reply
Old 03-19-2014 | 12:55 PM
  #8  
Meh...
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Nunya
Default

We may still have some of the older Airbus with the "small" engines on them.

I've been a Boeing guy since day 1 so I'm not 100% about if we still have those or not.
Reply
Old 03-19-2014 | 01:39 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,497
Likes: 66
From: MD-11 FO
Default

Originally Posted by 757HI
We may still have some of the older Airbus with the "small" engines on them.

I've been a Boeing guy since day 1 so I'm not 100% about if we still have those or not.
I think there are still a few in the system, according to my Airbus manuals. I think they're classified as A01 in the system, with the -A1 engines on them.

It could be that or just extreme tankering with the fuel contamination in Vegas.

It's not common to have to weigh restrict, but it does happen. Sorry you didn't make it on.
Reply
Old 03-19-2014 | 06:44 PM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

I was under the impression that both jump seats could always used and never weight restricted even if that meant bumping passengers. Does that only apply us pilots?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
APC225
United
154
07-13-2012 02:53 PM
kalyx522
Major
18
06-14-2012 02:25 AM
vagabond
Pilot Health
6
10-21-2007 12:07 PM
Gman
Major
34
04-12-2007 08:43 PM
ryane946
Regional
12
07-16-2006 07:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices