Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   American (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/american/)
-   -   3 way seniority integration-Fire Away (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/american/84315-3-way-seniority-integration-fire-away.html)

PurpleTurtle 10-13-2014 07:14 PM


Originally Posted by JetMonkey (Post 1745411)
2 airlines means 2 airlines.

One will find meaningless any and all implicit assumptions that are inconsistent with the Protocol Agreement.

JetMonkey 10-14-2014 09:10 PM


Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle (Post 1745760)
One will find meaningless any and all implicit assumptions that are inconsistent with the Protocol Agreement.

Arbitrators can do as they wish. I know turtles are slow.. but come on, man!

PurpleTurtle 10-14-2014 10:32 PM


Originally Posted by JetMonkey (Post 1746525)
Arbitrators can do as they wish. I know turtles are slow.. but come on, man!

That is premised upon an implicit assumption, and false.

algflyr 10-15-2014 05:59 AM


Originally Posted by JetMonkey (Post 1746525)
Arbitrators can do as they wish. I know turtles are slow.. but come on, man!

I would re-read the Protocol Agreement and see if you still agree with what you said...

pilot64golfer 10-15-2014 08:51 AM


Originally Posted by Al Czervik (Post 1740537)
Interesting but...
No points for AC orders unless they are purely growth. New replacement aircraft mean zero.

In the UAL/CAL arbitration the arbitrators completely ignored new airplane orders in their status and category list, and just went with what was on the property the day of the merger on each side, separated into 3 groups, Widebody (747/777), Midbody (757,767), Narrowbody (A320,737).

Delta/NW has something similar, but they had a 100% status and category merger and United/CAL used S&C and longevity.

Good luck to everyone over there.

Seaslap8 10-28-2014 06:04 PM


Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle (Post 1742065)
I'm very comfortable the arbitration panel will get every aspect of the new SLI dead-bang on target, because in the eyes of the law it will be fair, equitable, and implemented... Correct and complete. Anyone who attempts to argue otherwise will waste emotions and money.

Which of course begs the question yet again...if ultimately you and your ilk determine that the arbitration panel didn't get it "dead-bang on target" (or at least to your liking), what then? USAPA redux?

Seaslap8 10-28-2014 06:05 PM


Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle (Post 1746528)
That is premised upon an implicit assumption, and false.

ashphincter says what?

PurpleTurtle 10-28-2014 07:51 PM


Originally Posted by Seaslap8 (Post 1754864)
Which of course begs the question yet again...if ultimately you and your ilk determine that the arbitration panel didn't get it "dead-bang on target" (or at least to your liking), what then? USAPA redux?

Presenting a hypothetical and then squealing about unanswered questions... that's rich with irony.

"If" Wake's order stands, what will the east do?

"If" the 9th rules against USAPA what will the East do?

"If" Silver rules in the DJ against USAPA what will the East do?

"If" Silver finds a DFR what will USAPA do?

If, if, if, if... always assuming bad things will happen to the "ilk" and then wanting to know what the "ilk" will do.

Once the SLI comes out I will buy a bargain basement discounted clearance Liberty Tie. :cool:

flybywire44 10-29-2014 09:19 PM


Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle (Post 1754914)
Presenting a hypothetical and then squealing about unanswered questions... that's rich with irony.

"If" Wake's order stands, what will the east do?

"If" the 9th rules against USAPA what will the East do?

"If" Silver rules in the DJ against USAPA what will the East do?

"If" Silver finds a DFR what will USAPA do?

If, if, if, if... always assuming bad things will happen to the "ilk" and then wanting to know what the "ilk" will do.

Once the SLI comes out I will buy a bargain basement discounted clearance Liberty Tie. :cool:

To what extent is the West class liable for attorneys fees if they do not prevail in a DFR case?

80ktsClamp 10-29-2014 10:13 PM

http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/2013...87487310-6.gif


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:52 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands