3 way seniority integration-Fire Away

Reply Subscribe

Page 7 of 15

« First

Last »

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

10-13-2014 | 07:14 PM

#61

PurpleTurtle

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Apr 2011

Posts: 1,967

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by JetMonkey

2 airlines means 2 airlines.

One will find meaningless any and all implicit assumptions that are inconsistent with the Protocol Agreement.

10-14-2014 | 09:10 PM

#62

JetMonkey

Cactus Aviator

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 250

Likes: 0

From: Learning to fly with my left hand.

Quote:

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle

One will find meaningless any and all implicit assumptions that are inconsistent with the Protocol Agreement.

Arbitrators can do as they wish. I know turtles are slow.. but come on, man!

10-14-2014 | 10:32 PM

#63

PurpleTurtle

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Apr 2011

Posts: 1,967

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by JetMonkey

Arbitrators can do as they wish. I know turtles are slow.. but come on, man!

That is premised upon an implicit assumption, and false.

10-15-2014 | 05:59 AM

#64

algflyr

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jan 2013

Posts: 203

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by JetMonkey

Arbitrators can do as they wish. I know turtles are slow.. but come on, man!

I would re-read the Protocol Agreement and see if you still agree with what you said...

10-15-2014 | 08:51 AM

#65

pilot64golfer

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Nov 2013

Posts: 1,168

Likes: 0

From: Gets weekends off

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Czervik

Interesting but...
No points for AC orders unless they are purely growth. New replacement aircraft mean zero.

In the UAL/CAL arbitration the arbitrators completely ignored new airplane orders in their status and category list, and just went with what was on the property the day of the merger on each side, separated into 3 groups, Widebody (747/777), Midbody (757,767), Narrowbody (A320,737).

Delta/NW has something similar, but they had a 100% status and category merger and United/CAL used S&C and longevity.

Good luck to everyone over there.

10-28-2014 | 06:04 PM

#66

Seaslap8

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Aug 2008

Posts: 448

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle

I'm very comfortable the arbitration panel will get every aspect of the new SLI dead-bang on target, because in the eyes of the law it will be fair, equitable, and implemented... Correct and complete. Anyone who attempts to argue otherwise will waste emotions and money.

Which of course begs the question yet again...if ultimately you and your ilk determine that the arbitration panel didn't get it "dead-bang on target" (or at least to your liking), what then? USAPA redux?

10-28-2014 | 06:05 PM

#67

Seaslap8

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Aug 2008

Posts: 448

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle

That is premised upon an implicit assumption, and false.

ashphincter says what?

10-28-2014 | 07:51 PM

#68

PurpleTurtle

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Apr 2011

Posts: 1,967

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seaslap8

Presenting a hypothetical and then squealing about unanswered questions... that's rich with irony.

"If" Wake's order stands, what will the east do?

"If" the 9th rules against USAPA what will the East do?

"If" Silver rules in the DJ against USAPA what will the East do?

"If" Silver finds a DFR what will USAPA do?

If, if, if, if... always assuming bad things will happen to the "ilk" and then wanting to know what the "ilk" will do.

Once the SLI comes out I will buy a bargain basement discounted clearance Liberty Tie.