Search
Notices

Jan 30th

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2015, 10:12 AM
  #41  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by justjack View Post
I think that we have to be careful about fighting each other especially on a forum like this. I think that the company needs to understand that the majority of the pilots see the company for what they are and we are unified in our utter contempt for them. We also see through the lies and deceit. There might be a few outliers and there are certainly lots of different opinions on how to proceed but this last move is the tipping point.
They don't need this (or any) forum to tell them that. They need look no further then the BOD for division. The BOD's excuses are they are acting in the interests of what the majority of their domicile members tell them. The only thing that can save AA pilots now is AA pilots. The BOD shuttle-passed the ball back to us and we either drop and curl for loss of the game or run the ball back for a TD to keep it going.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 01-10-2015, 10:14 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Andrew_VT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by Capt Hindsight View Post
And this is how they get you to turn against your own union.
Capt H
I was already leaning that way after reading that they (without public input) gave up a better duty rig for pairings with more days than duty periods for 10 cents of domestic per diem. Giving away profit sharing for a one time ~70? million bargaining credit didn't help either. Now comes 10 day BoD breaks during critical negotiation times for the holidays, 12-10 votes, and a willingness to give up thousands of dollars for not planning ahead enough to meet a deadline they've known about for awhile.

Don't take this to mean I'm on the companies side. I agree almost completely with justjack's great post above. But I've been very disappointed in what I've seen from APA so far.
Andrew_VT is offline  
Old 01-10-2015, 10:18 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Default

... by contrast read Steve Dickson's letter to the Delta pilots on the APA site. Amazing. Have Parker and Kirby decided that they cannot compete with Delta and decided to go the way of the LCC model instead. Maybe they are such douche-bags that they would rather NOT have a classy airline or maybe they just do not know how to run a first class airline. Maybe they just fell into this position and now this is all they know. American airlines cannot be taken seriously as long as those two are running it.
Pilots have never been great at negotiating contracts and that has never killed an airline. This type of management is toxic.
...I just keep adding but the sick feeling is sinking in. I remember it well from before... how hopeful we all were to have survived and then the realization about Parker/Kirby/ Glass. Deja vu.
justjack is offline  
Old 01-10-2015, 10:20 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
biigD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,729
Default

Speaking of Group 1, did anyone else notice that 190 lines were painted at our (US) gates in SNA?
biigD is offline  
Old 01-10-2015, 10:51 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
They don't need this (or any) forum to tell them that. They need look no further then the BOD for division. The BOD's excuses are they are acting in the interests of what the majority of their domicile members tell them. The only thing that can save AA pilots now is AA pilots. The BOD shuttle-passed the ball back to us and we either drop and curl for loss of the game or run the ball back for a TD to keep it going.
But frankly, I would think that you would be happy with the APA- You did not want this to pass and they have sent it out for a vote. Did you want them to turn it down flat and not even give us a chance to vote - to only consider your opinion? If they had not sent it out for a vote, I (and many like me)would be livid. They cannot only represent one view point. Many of us worry that the MOU is not as good as the last offer and were waiting for a detailed, side by side, explanation which we expected would be forthcoming. Passing it without a vote now because the company says they must, is also wrong. I do not think that everything that the APA has done is perfect but under the circumstances that we now work, this is understandable. I have no doubt that the company had some demographics about this pilot group. 14 THOUSAND pilots can be frightening but divide them up and it's easy- and how easy it must have been to divide us. The company really hates the old guys and there's so many of us- we cost them so much more money. They can't wait to see us go but until then, they use the older pilot group as a pawn in the division.
When I wanted to get my kids to do something I would give them only choices that I liked- I knew that we were not really negotiating. The sooner we all realize that this is precisely what has happened here since day one, the sooner we will figure out how to proceed.
justjack is offline  
Old 01-10-2015, 11:20 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Default

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ytCEuuW2_A
justjack is offline  
Old 01-10-2015, 11:44 AM
  #47  
Weekend workaholic
 
flyinawa's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 669
Default

Originally Posted by biigD View Post
Speaking of Group 1, did anyone else notice that 190 lines were painted at our (US) gates in SNA?
They've been painting them and repainting them for years in the Western US. Maybe somebody thought something was going to happen a long time ago...and then it hasn't.
flyinawa is offline  
Old 01-10-2015, 12:26 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Default

Originally Posted by justjack View Post
But let's go over the facts. First Parker goes to the APA (who were willing to do anything to get rid of Horton) and negotiates a deal without so much as a word to the US pilots(who had worked at the lowest pay in the industry for a decade, facilitating the merger in the first place and who had a change of control clause in their sh*tty contract) knowing that this would ultimately cause a fragmented group of pilots, which is the culture that he thrived in for years.
Parker then drags his feet with negotiations... he had to wait for the FA's contract to get worked out??? Remember that - not so long ago?
Less than two weeks ago the APA agreed to accept the deal without sending it out for a vote with only a few changes. The company's answer was a flat "no" - not we can work on ONE thing, we can massage it - nothing- a flat "no" and "we are working on the exact language but the clock is ticking- tick tock." Now the company has insisted on an arbitrary deadline, which they know full well cannot be met. They know it is not possible to pass by the membership by the 19th.
SO for what we do not know:
If the company REALLY wanted this to pass, why then suddenly find a way to offer less which essentially insures that it will not?
Was the company taking our temperature and thought that might pass so they sabotaged the offer? Did they think it wouldn't pass so they sabotaged the offer? Are they trying to create an even more fragmented group of pilots? Are they trying to force the APA to pass it without a vote- AGAIN creating a more fragmented group?
Is there some information due out at the end of the month - between the 19th and the 30th - that will change things? Is this the bum's rush or are we being played- or both?
The only sure thing is this is a very very bad sign on top of too many other very bad signs. The culture of this airline has been truly and forever defined.

History tells us what they are doing. They are banking on a "no" and then they will use it to fracture the union more, a couple hardline reps will suffer recalls, then once the membership is begging and ready to accept anything just to move ahead the company will offer LOA 93... And it will pass.

Or we just keep the Green Book, and either route is fine by Parkirby.
PurpleTurtle is offline  
Old 01-10-2015, 12:34 PM
  #49  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,878
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76 View Post
Thanks for costing me several thousand APA!

Theyre dragging their dang feet! There's plenty of time for them to put this out for a vote! 10 days is enough. You only need a week max for voting.
Deleted. Not worth it.
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 01-10-2015, 01:11 PM
  #50  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by justjack View Post
But frankly, I would think that you would be happy with the APA- You did not want this to pass and they have sent it out for a vote. Did you want them to turn it down flat and not even give us a chance to vote - to only consider your opinion? If they had not sent it out for a vote, I (and many like me)would be livid. They cannot only represent one view point. Many of us worry that the MOU is not as good as the last offer and were waiting for a detailed, side by side, explanation which we expected would be forthcoming. Passing it without a vote now because the company says they must, is also wrong. I do not think that everything that the APA has done is perfect but under the circumstances that we now work, this is understandable. I have no doubt that the company had some demographics about this pilot group. 14 THOUSAND pilots can be frightening but divide them up and it's easy- and how easy it must have been to divide us. The company really hates the old guys and there's so many of us- we cost them so much more money. They can't wait to see us go but until then, they use the older pilot group as a pawn in the division.
When I wanted to get my kids to do something I would give them only choices that I liked- I knew that we were not really negotiating. The sooner we all realize that this is precisely what has happened here since day one, the sooner we will figure out how to proceed.
I have my issues with APA to be sure. No, I don't think this TA should have gotten past the BOD. Considering the tactics used and the obviously apparent weaknesses of much of the group in looking past and rationalizing quick payoffs, it simply amounts to union-busting via negotiating with the membership. Considering Parker hired a notorious union-buster to spearhead his plan, that's of no surprise.

This vote is the true Russian-roulette of this process. At this point we will either survive the game or blow our brains out.
eaglefly is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cptslewis
Career Questions
13
01-09-2015 06:19 PM
satpak77
Regional
0
01-01-2015 01:18 PM
MountyFlyer
Cargo
12
01-23-2009 08:49 PM
iaflyer
Major
38
01-06-2008 05:04 PM
CAL EWR
Regional
1
12-10-2006 08:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices