West merger committee 1/28
01-30-2015, 07:07 PM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Originally Posted by R57 relay
I heard from a friend that the west SLI committee is having to fund itself. That's not right. USAPA should give them funds from the money they collected as dues.
Personally I would love so much to see a few get pinched and teach the final lesson but I am certain that they will just edge under the wire and avoid being criminally charged.
WD at AWA
01-30-2015, 07:10 PM
#22
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
They dont really need self funding. The company via apa must give them monies as well. I can not remember the split but all 3 get the same amount. What ever monies are left over withing the coffers of the former usapa will be returned or face federal investigation. Dues money games can cost people their freedom, union corruption is no joke and you can thank the teamsters from way back for the laws.
Personally I would love so much to see a few get pinched and teach the final lesson but I am certain that they will just edge under the wire and avoid being criminally charged.
WD at AWA
Personally I would love so much to see a few get pinched and teach the final lesson but I am certain that they will just edge under the wire and avoid being criminally charged.
WD at AWA
01-30-2015, 07:11 PM
#23
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Originally Posted by R57 relay
I heard from a friend that the west SLI committee is having to fund itself. That's not right. USAPA should give them funds from the money they collected as dues.
Last edited by cactiboss; 01-30-2015 at 07:47 PM.
01-31-2015, 06:18 PM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Originally Posted by cactiboss
wrong! The company will only give the money after the sli is complete and delivered, until then we rely on donations.
WD at AWA
02-01-2015, 09:44 AM
#28
Works Every Weekend
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Originally Posted by cactiboss
""Mou is seniority neutral"" it's up to arbitrators to either "be the new Nicolau" or accept his work. People that know arbitrators can opine as to wether they like to mess with others work.....
Pilot seniority list arbitrators are a small fraternity.
George Nicolau is a very senior and highly respected member of that fraternity.
I'm sure the East advocates will bear that in mind when presenting their case.
At least some degree of deference to Nicolau would seem wise.
Advocating an all out rejection of Nicolau's work would be extremely perilous.
02-01-2015, 11:35 AM
#29
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
Actually I am not wrong, the money gets paid we are now just talking about when not if.
WD at AWA
WD at AWA
02-01-2015, 12:14 PM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 321
Originally Posted by Check Essential
+1
Pilot seniority list arbitrators are a small fraternity.
George Nicolau is a very senior and highly respected member of that fraternity.
I'm sure the East advocates will bear that in mind when presenting their case.
At least some degree of deference to Nicolau would seem wise.
Advocating an all out rejection of Nicolau's work would be extremely perilous.
Pilot seniority list arbitrators are a small fraternity.
George Nicolau is a very senior and highly respected member of that fraternity.
I'm sure the East advocates will bear that in mind when presenting their case.
At least some degree of deference to Nicolau would seem wise.
Advocating an all out rejection of Nicolau's work would be extremely perilous.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
