![]() |
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 1918591)
No, they are separate things. But does the APA owe ME, not USAPA, a DFR? They wanted it, they got it.
|
Originally Posted by cactiboss
(Post 1918604)
And they fulfilled it.
|
Originally Posted by GrapeNuts
(Post 1918587)
Exactly. Rank and his east buddies are getting DFR confused with court appeals. The APA nor the arbitration board issued the restriction to USAPA, the court ordered it and that is the forum they need to address their disagreement. Walking out of the arbitration is going to only hurt the east pilots, but if they do it will definitely expedite the SLI hearings.
I feel bad for the third listers, they are anchored to the titanic. USAPA is not our union and does not dictate the outcome. If USAPA is a sunk ship, how are they tied to it? USAPA took itself out. The 3rd lister are still here, and just like everyone else, really have no control of where this goes. In the end it up to the MB Arb, isn't it? Do not worry about third listers, in 10yrs we will be far past this and in much better positions once the circus end and becomes a history lesson to remind us what not to do. |
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 1918623)
It's not static.
|
Only change is that East will not actively argue against the Nic.
Panel will proceed with MB as planned. IMHO In reality the only reason usapa existed was to oppose the Nic and the gag order makes their existence moot. But I am a simple man with a simple mind waiting for forum schooling |
Originally Posted by Spoiler
(Post 1918672)
Only change is that East will not actively argue against the Nic.
Panel will proceed with MB as planned. IMHO In reality the only reason usapa existed was to oppose the Nic and the gag order makes their existence moot. But I am a simple man with a simple mind waiting for forum schooling |
Originally Posted by Spoiler
(Post 1918672)
Only change is that East will not actively argue against the Nic.
Panel will proceed with MB as planned. IMHO In reality the only reason usapa existed was to oppose the Nic and the gag order makes their existence moot. But I am a simple man with a simple mind waiting for forum schooling |
There is a much larger picture here that's being missed. The east committee pulled out, this is not a surprise to anyone as that's their MO. The fact of the matter is with the 9th's ruling there is no need for an east committee as they are already represented via the previous award. The east sought a do over and that has failed. The 9th gave them the opportunity to be present but limited that presence to advancing the award. This tells us that the east is represented via the award itself
Now if I had to guess and its a wild one at that I would think that the panel is going to use the nic list BUT here is the catch to that. I think the first 2000 spots are going to go to AA for their wide bodies. Now this also presents some problem when it comes to the LUS wide's but I can see a way out for that. WD at AWA |
Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
(Post 1918727)
I think the first 2000 spots are going to go to AA for their wide bodies. WD at AWA |
Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
(Post 1918727)
There is a much larger picture her
Now if I had to guess and its a wild one at that I would think that the panel is going to use the nic list BUT here is the catch to that. I think the first 2000 spots are going to go to AA for their wide bodies. Now this also presents some problem when it comes to the LUS wide's but I can see a way out for that. WD at AWA |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:12 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands