Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Law
Petition to Not Arm TSA Agents >

Petition to Not Arm TSA Agents

Search
Notices
Aviation Law Legal issues, FARs, and questions

Petition to Not Arm TSA Agents

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2013, 11:43 AM
  #31  
Junior Senior
 
LNL76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Whiskey Papa
Posts: 2,850
Default

Many posters have alluded to it....

I never said ALL of them should have weapons, but as my earlier post stated I have NO problem with those with military/LEO background being armed after stringent background checks/training.
LNL76 is offline  
Old 11-11-2013, 11:50 AM
  #32  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by LNL76 View Post
Many posters have alluded to it....

I never said ALL of them should have weapons, but as my earlier post stated I have NO problem with those with military/LEO background being armed after stringent background checks/training.
Making them (any of them) into law enforcement would be at odds with their regulatory duties and the “administrative searches” they perform. Administrative Searches as defined by current law do not require a search warrant, nor should they, because TSA agents have no interest in criminal activities. Their duty is to safeguard civil aviation assets and those who use them. This does NOT require a firearm.
Sum Ting Wong is offline  
Old 11-11-2013, 11:57 AM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 248
Default

It would be interesting to count the number of firearms carried by law enforcement officers at a typical large airport already. I'm guessing the figure would be in the low hundreds.
Sum Ting Wong is offline  
Old 11-11-2013, 03:38 PM
  #34  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Captain part 135
Posts: 88
Default

Originally Posted by Sum Ting Wong View Post
I don't believe anyone here has said all TSA agents are criminals or are lazy. I've no doubt there are plenty of hard working, honest and responsible people who work for the TSA, but the organization itself does not keep the bar very high.

These are the requirements of getting a job for the TSA:

a background investigation, including a credit and criminal check
a drug screening and medical evaluation
no debt defaults of $7,500 or more (except for some bankruptcies)
no delinquent federal or state taxes or past-due child support payments
males must be registered for Selective Service
must be a U.S. citizen or U.S. national at time of application
must be at least 18 at the time of application
must be English proficient
must have a high-school diploma, a GED –or – “at least one year of full-time work experience in the security industry, aviation screening, or as an X-ray technician.”

There are more stringent requirements to pump gas or flip burgers let alone be an armed federal agent. The FBI process for example requires background investigations, character references, lie detector tests etc. I doubt many TSA personnel could get a state issued CCW if they tried.

Anyone who has flown in the past decade or so has no doubt seen first hand many examples of bullying, abuse of power, improper touching, harassment, unprofessionalism and the like, at the hands of TSA personnel. Are these glorified mall cops really the kind of people you feel comfortable having a badge AND gun?
I was a pawn in the burger war and I never had to meet any of those standards. I don’t think a gas pumper does either. You’ve overplayed your point my friend. Sound like these TSA folks are screened just about as well as airline pilots.

Last edited by bullmechum; 11-11-2013 at 03:44 PM. Reason: proof read
bullmechum is offline  
Old 11-11-2013, 04:39 PM
  #35  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by LNL76 View Post
Many posters have alluded to it....

I never said ALL of them should have weapons, but as my earlier post stated I have NO problem with those with military/LEO background being armed after stringent background checks/training.

I have no problem with those particular folks having weapons, I just don't want to pay for it. Federal cops are very expensive.

Now if they want to do it FFDO style, where it's non-paid I'd be OK with a little taxpayers support for that. Doubt the government employee unions would go for it though.


But there's also the issue of an armed guy being distracted while stacking tubs or whatever and losing control of his weapon. Are we going to have pay for even MORE people to stand around and do even less work than regular smurfs?
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 11-11-2013, 05:24 PM
  #36  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by bullmechum View Post
I was a pawn in the burger war and I never had to meet any of those standards. I don’t think a gas pumper does either. You’ve overplayed your point my friend. Sound like these TSA folks are screened just about as well as airline pilots.
hy·per·bo·le (h-pûrb-l)
n.
A figure of speech in which exaggeration is used for emphasis or effect, as in I could sleep for a year or This book weighs a ton.

The dictionary can be your friend if you allow it.
Sum Ting Wong is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tweet46
Foreign
147
08-22-2022 01:41 PM
ANGFDX
Cargo
41
02-02-2012 11:48 AM
EWRflyr
Hangar Talk
137
11-27-2010 11:04 PM
JiffyLube
Major
4
08-21-2008 07:49 PM
theaviator
Regional
51
06-24-2008 09:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices