Unmanned Cargo Aircraft??
03-27-2017, 04:06 PM
#1
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 43
Unmanned Cargo Aircraft??
A Startup’s Plan To Cut Air Freight Costs In Half With 777-Size Drones
In 2020, Natilus’s huge unmanned planes could carry 200,000 pounds of goods across the world. But first, a 30-foot prototype must pass test runs.
http://https://www.fastcompany.com/3...77-size-drones
In 2020, Natilus’s huge unmanned planes could carry 200,000 pounds of goods across the world. But first, a 30-foot prototype must pass test runs.
http://https://www.fastcompany.com/3...77-size-drones
03-27-2017, 05:59 PM
#4
New Hire
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 2
It would be more believable if it was round and edible , as this is such a pie-in-the-Sky idea , anyone with knowledge of logistics , engineering , industry best practices and a bit of pragmatism would soon realise that this idea will never materialise in it's current flawed form. No business case here.
03-27-2017, 06:53 PM
#5
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Position: Really Old School Freight Dog- Fly SW!
Posts: 33
LOL! One reason at my age I won't ever fly for a cargo outfit. You guys flying for FedEx/UPS or Kalita are the last of the " stage coach drivers". I work with drones a lot and the technology and enthusiasm of the younger gen doing it are amazing. I figure they drone a Van then move on up the food chain…..then pax ops. ;-)
03-27-2017, 07:24 PM
#6
China Visa Applicant
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,919
I love this:
Well, because water landing rights for an amphibious 300,000# airfreighter are gonna be simple! Just land right there in Long Beach harbor and taxi on up to the docks. I'm sure such landing rights are gonna be just as simple in China, India, UAE, etc., because coordinating with the ships going in and out of those ports are going to be a snap.
Of course, there's also never bad weather or poor sea conditions right there by the docks.
All of which is just gonna save so much time and money!
I can't wait to see how the longshoremen "revolutionize" the freight industry after this thing arrives.
Good luck, and party on dudes.
Because the drones would be unlikely to receive government approval to fly over populated areas, they are designed to take off and land in the water. They don’t even have landing gears. The expectation is that after landing, they would taxi into a standard port, where cargo would be unloaded using cranes.
Of course, there's also never bad weather or poor sea conditions right there by the docks.
All of which is just gonna save so much time and money!
I can't wait to see how the longshoremen "revolutionize" the freight industry after this thing arrives.
Good luck, and party on dudes.
03-27-2017, 07:25 PM
#7
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 461
Better off to retrofit a 777 instead of trying to make an all new airplane.
These designers are about to have a very painful learning experience.
Cessna Caravans already have an optionally piloted version for military use.
It's only a matter of time.
Hell, I'm sure Amazon is looking into it.
These designers are about to have a very painful learning experience.
Cessna Caravans already have an optionally piloted version for military use.
It's only a matter of time.
Hell, I'm sure Amazon is looking into it.
03-27-2017, 07:32 PM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 209
Like I've said before, just because the pilot(s) aren't in the cockpit doesn't mean they are out of the loop. You'll still need pilots somewhere. I for one would be interested in converting a room in my house to a remote cockpit office.
I could fly a morning shift from home then head over to my hangar (1 mile from my house), pull out the bug smasher and fly to lunch. I don't need to go to the big airport and deal with that crap anymore. Sleep in my own bed, hell yeah.
I could fly a morning shift from home then head over to my hangar (1 mile from my house), pull out the bug smasher and fly to lunch. I don't need to go to the big airport and deal with that crap anymore. Sleep in my own bed, hell yeah.
03-27-2017, 07:41 PM
#9
China Visa Applicant
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,919
Originally Posted by Sam York
Like I've said before, just because the pilot(s) aren't in the cockpit doesn't mean they are out of the loop. You'll still need pilots somewhere. I for one would be interested in converting a room in my house to a remote cockpit office.
I could fly a morning shift from home then head over to my hangar (1 mile from my house), pull out the bug smasher and fly to lunch. I don't need to go to the big airport and deal with that crap anymore. Sleep in my own bed, hell yeah.
I could fly a morning shift from home then head over to my hangar (1 mile from my house), pull out the bug smasher and fly to lunch. I don't need to go to the big airport and deal with that crap anymore. Sleep in my own bed, hell yeah.
03-27-2017, 08:17 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 137
Originally Posted by Hacker15e
And, of course, the satellite time and bandwidth to operate these things transocean is just going to be so much cheaper than paying pilots.
SpaceX launches rockets to space, which then deploy several satellites, and steer themselves to land vertically on a barge floating in the ocean. I don't in the least doubt that someone, whether it be Boeing, Airbus, or a startup, will produce autonomous aircraft within the next 10 years.
I don't have to like the idea of non-piloted airplanes, but it seems to me best to hope for the best and prepare for the worst.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
