Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Posting 08-01 Food for Thought... >

Posting 08-01 Food for Thought...

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Posting 08-01 Food for Thought...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-2008, 06:29 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Purpledriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 107
Default

Originally Posted by magic rat View Post
Average life expectancy for a male who retires at 60? 73!

Average life expectancy for a male who retires at 65? 67!!

Welcome back fellas!
I thought if you worked to 65 you died at 64.
Purpledriver is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 07:55 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,191
Default

Originally Posted by Busboy View Post
...They will just wait for the upcoming excess bid, and go where they want. This seems like a no-brainer.
Maybe true on the DC-10.... but, maybe not true on the 727.

The compnay has said there should be a DC-10 excess bid in the near future, but has not said the same thing about the 727.

If the events of the past few weeks prove anything, it's that the future is very unsure and you never know when the music is going to stop playing.

Thus, you better take whatever chance you can to change seats, if you are not happy/satisfied with your current seat.

A'o Aloha

Last edited by DLax85; 01-04-2008 at 07:57 AM. Reason: added verbiage
DLax85 is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 08:06 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,191
Question

Originally Posted by AerisArmis View Post
and they could bid with other over 60 guys, that, if I understand correctly, would have to get bumped due to the "over-under 60" international restrictions?]

How do you spell S-U-B-S-T-I-T-U-T-I-O-N? Any bets on how that will play out? "Removed for legality"!
Should we (collectively) really allow this to happen?

Does it make sense from an economic standpoint?

Hey, Age 65 is now the law, but we should not implement it in such a fashion that it just creates a useless, unproductive cost center --- that hurts everyone.

If I try to pickup a trip in open time that has a "legal violation", VIPS will deny it.

If an over 60 FO bids an international line they cannot legally hold (i.e. the Capt is over 60), then perhaps they should be denied the line and awarded the very first line their "seniority...AND...age" can hold.

Of course, someone will ask --- What if the FO is senior to the Capt?

...shouldn't the Capt be the one forced to lose the line.

I guess we could debate that, but my initial thought is "no".

That priviledge stays with the Capt ---if you want it, then upgrade.

Last edited by DLax85; 01-04-2008 at 08:08 AM. Reason: added verbiage
DLax85 is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 10:23 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Overnitefr8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 767 CA
Posts: 1,876
Default

Anyone know what happens now when an F/O with less than 75 hours in the aircraft tries to pick up a trip in which the Capt has less than 75 hours in the aircraft (or vice versa)? Is the trip trade denied by VIPS for legality? Same for holding a line. If so, then I would think the age 60 rule would work the same way.
Overnitefr8 is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 10:37 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

Originally Posted by DLax85 View Post
If I try to pickup a trip in open time that has a "legal violation", VIPS will deny it.

If an over 60 FO bids an international line they cannot legally hold (i.e. the Capt is over 60), then perhaps they should be denied the line and awarded the very first line their "seniority...AND...age" can hold.

Of course, someone will ask --- What if the FO is senior to the Capt?

...shouldn't the Capt be the one forced to lose the line.

I guess we could debate that, but my initial thought is "no".

That priviledge stays with the Capt ---if you want it, then upgrade.
I believe you are right on. Nothing need change, at least in the bidding process. The captains bid closes, then the first officers, then the second officers. If a captain over 60 is already on an international trip, then the over 60 first officer should get his first choice of trips that he can legally hold. If his first choice was the line that the over 60 captain had been awarded, the computer should just bypass that line and look at the first officer's next choice. A more difficult issue might be the assignment of RFO lines or reserve assignments, but that's the companys problem, not ours.
Jetjok is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 10:42 AM
  #36  
Slainge Var'
 
AerisArmis's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Zeppelin Tail Gunner
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok View Post
I believe you are right on. Nothing need change, at least in the bidding process. The captains bid closes, then the first officers, then the second officers. If a captain over 60 is already on an international trip, then the over 60 first officer should get his first choice of trips that he can legally hold. If his first choice was the line that the over 60 captain had been awarded, the computer should just bypass that line and look at the first officer's next choice. A more difficult issue might be the assignment of RFO lines or reserve assignments, but that's the companys problem, not ours.
Ah, but on the mighty Mogan David, you might have a line with 4, 5 , 6 or more pairings, all with different Captains. So if the number one F/O, over 60, has one 6 CH trip with an over 60 Capt, his whole line should be scrapped? Maybe an e-mail telling him to pick something else out of open time would be more appropriate.
AerisArmis is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 12:29 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,418
Default

And what if the Capt has vacation that month....and is only flying 1 or 2 pairings.....what happens then?

A more JR FO gets that line because of a small percentage of legality problems?
kronan is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 12:47 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fedupbusdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: A300/310 Capt
Posts: 1,642
Default

if the over 60 f/o doesn,t like it, he could retire.
fedupbusdriver is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 05:34 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by Overnitefr8 View Post
Anyone know what happens now when an F/O with less than 75 hours in the aircraft tries to pick up a trip in which the Capt has less than 75 hours in the aircraft (or vice versa)? Is the trip trade denied by VIPS for legality? Same for holding a line. If so, then I would think the age 60 rule would work the same way.

Yes the FO isn't allowed to pick up the trip.

When I was a new MD FO out of training, I bid my first monthly line.
When I saw my Bid award "Line 123" I noticed it was my 5th choice.

I went to the line awards and noticed my 4th choice went to a FO who was JR to me. I called EB at crew planning. He ran the numbers and finally determined that the CAPT on line 123 was just out of training too.

So they gave my line to a JR FO who had over 75 hours.

I did get paid protected for the higher of the line value, but that is that they handled it. I suppose it isn't too far a stretch to think that is how 2 over 60 Pilots would work.
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 06:17 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Albief15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 2,889
Default

What if the FO is senior to the captain? Could happen...

So...does seat or seniority take precedence?

Interesting times...
Albief15 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pilot41
Domestic
16
04-23-2008 08:31 PM
Joeshmoe
Regional
66
11-06-2007 06:12 PM
Canyonman
Cargo
43
10-12-2007 08:40 AM
LAfrequentflyer
Money Talk
1
08-02-2007 09:56 AM
machz990
Cargo
5
07-26-2007 07:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices