Fdx... Overmanning?
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 0
From: leaning to the left
Really? I think it has everything to do with it. How would they build 48hr lines that go around the world, within our CBA?
#42
OK..let me esplain dis again....if the company lowers the blg to 48...lines can be built the same as today...the only difference is that the company would not be required to buy those lines less than 68 like they are today...saving about a million a month...GOT IT ???????????
Last edited by BOYCAPTAIN; 10-01-2008 at 08:24 AM.
#43
OK..let me esplain dis again....if the company lowers the blg to 48...lines can be built the same as today...the only difference is that the company would not be required to buy those lines less than 68 like they are today...saving about a million a month...GOT IT ???????????
Sure, but how many lines would that create? More than the number of pilots we have?
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 0
From: leaning to the left
OK..let me esplain dis again....if the company lowers the blg to 48...lines can be built the same as today...the only difference is that the company would not be required to buy those lines less than 68 like they are today...saving about a million a month...GOT IT ???????????
FDX flt operations has seemed to be fixated on cutting costs for quite some time now. With the optimizer, accepted fares, fuel sense, Marriotts to Holiday Inns, no paper bid-packs, manuals, the espresso machine in CDG, etc.
So, if it would save over $1 million/month and you have all the answers:
WHY HAVEN"T THEY ALREADY DONE THAT?????
Last edited by Busboy; 10-01-2008 at 09:25 AM.
#46
Part Time Employee
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Because to do that - they would have to announce they are doing it to prevent or delay a (dare I use the word) furlough

Not good press when you do something like that
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 0
From: leaning to the left
They just announced the "actual" layoff of 200 FDX Office employees. Didn't seem to effect anything.
Who would they announce this BLG reduction to? And, who would give a crap? The WSJ? Financial Times? They wouldn't be announcing a furlough!! They would be announcing a cost saving measure of $1 million/month. We, the FDX pilots would be the only ones that care.
Who would they announce this BLG reduction to? And, who would give a crap? The WSJ? Financial Times? They wouldn't be announcing a furlough!! They would be announcing a cost saving measure of $1 million/month. We, the FDX pilots would be the only ones that care.
#48
#49
They just announced the "actual" layoff of 200 FDX Office employees. Didn't seem to effect anything.
Who would they announce this BLG reduction to? And, who would give a crap? The WSJ? Financial Times? They wouldn't be announcing a furlough!! They would be announcing a cost saving measure of $1 million/month. We, the FDX pilots would be the only ones that care.
Who would they announce this BLG reduction to? And, who would give a crap? The WSJ? Financial Times? They wouldn't be announcing a furlough!! They would be announcing a cost saving measure of $1 million/month. We, the FDX pilots would be the only ones that care.
u were a little confused as to the blg reduction....i explained it on how it could go down...48 is not a max but a min....manning is the company's job...not the union!.....let them sift over their proposals and sort this out....and i have no idea why the have not done this already...it is in the contract and i am glad they didn't...i like the extra day off!
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
So let me get this straight. The company can lower the BLG to 48 to prevent a furlough. Then the union builds the lines. They could build one line at 85 hours and one at 48. While the reserve guys get 15 days at the BLG. I don't think reserve in Anchorage will go senior anymore.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



