Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX-Candidates for MEC Chairman? >

FDX-Candidates for MEC Chairman?

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX-Candidates for MEC Chairman?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2008 | 09:18 PM
  #1  
iarapilot's Avatar
Thread Starter
"blue collar thug"!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
From: A proponent of...
Default FDX-Candidates for MEC Chairman?

Has anyone heard who is interested for the Chairman's position when DW is finished? I would imagine DM will run. I also hear that EI in SFS is considering it.
Reply
Old 11-19-2008 | 01:47 PM
  #2  
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
...Whatever It Is!
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by iarapilot
Has anyone heard who is interested for the Chairman's position when DW is finished? I would imagine DM will run. I also hear that EI in SFS is considering it.
LEC 7 Update 11/17/2008

Scroll down, 4 candidates so far!
Reply
Old 11-19-2008 | 02:01 PM
  #3  
fedupbusdriver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
From: A300/310 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by MD11Fr8Dog
LEC 7 Update 11/17/2008

Scroll down, 4 candidates so far!
RTFQ
He asked about MEC Chairman, not NC Chairman.
Reply
Old 11-19-2008 | 02:42 PM
  #4  
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
...Whatever It Is!
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fedupbusdriver
RTFQ
He asked about MEC Chairman, not NC Chairman.
Got me on that one!
Reply
Old 11-20-2008 | 07:14 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fedupbusdriver
RTFQ
He asked about MEC Chairman, not NC Chairman.
Just look at how blurry his avatar is, he must not have been wearing his bifocals.
Reply
Old 11-20-2008 | 08:56 AM
  #6  
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
...Whatever It Is!
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker
Just look at how blurry his avatar is, he must not have been wearing his bifocals.
The eyesight is fine, still better than 20/20 at age 47 ;D. That is a zoomed in picture of one of our MDs that was 5 miles abeam and 2000ft below us. The original is a 10megapixel image.

Reply
Old 11-20-2008 | 09:03 AM
  #7  
MaydayMark's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,304
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 Captain
Default

Pablo for MEC Chairman
Reply
Old 11-22-2008 | 06:53 AM
  #8  
nakazawa's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Continuing The Dream
Default

How much should our next Negotiating Chairman give away? Answering that [question] might help you decide who should be next. So far, the history of our MEC, the former NC (prior to FE), and the SIG have NOT been good. Without our FDA LOA, our CDG crews could have been subjected to EU/French labor laws. When they take a day off (strike), so would FedEx. FDX Corp absolutely needed those crews to be MEM domiciled, residing in CDG, subject to the RLA to avoid any labor issues. The CBA limits ground transport to 2 hours. YOU CAN NOT get from HKG to CAN in under 2 hours. So . . . [we] waived it. And now, we're waiving the non-public transportation restriction. Those two HUGE hammers were never used, and I'm not sure if they were considered. Want a few more give-aways? Read the last two FCIFs on VTO BLGs, and then show me in our CBA where there's a waiver to the 13 credit hour split. I'll help you - read 25.D.1 and 25.D.2. I know the Company is buying up lines - so . . . apply the 13 hour split to the low built line. I only have one 'rule-book' to work with - the CBA, and I have NO CLUE what we've given away, or what closed door agreement has been made. And, is there anybody that's been able to use the 'grid'?

We're apparently battling now on B-777 pay - and I've heard arguments going both directions. It's smaller than a B-747, and when we had them on the property, they were paid wide body pay. That was then - this is now. We negotiated a pay scale for a [new] aircraft - and we had to give something up for that scale. Is the Company going to give anything back to be able to pay the B-777 at our current scale? Doubt it!

I would be fearful now of what our ALPA leadership is considering to mitigate any reduction in force. The first answer should be NO. Besides accounting for all the hours now in our pairings - especially the MD-11 RFO and long range flights (over 8 hours), limiting carry-over, and narrowing the split temporarily from 13 (between low and high BLG) back to 8:30, or even less would certainly help. Or, as I eluded to earlier, start complying with the CBA.

'Things' are in the CBA because they COST. If [it] was free, I wouldn't need to negotiate [it]. Sitting at a ramp in a jet over two hours isn't operational - it's administrative and economics. It costs to split the segments. Putting in recliners, vending machines, bathrooms with hot and cold water isn't operational - it's administrative and economics. Stopping for gas in Fiji is operational. Typhoons and earthquakes are operational. Ice storms and snow are operational.

Please - PLEASE - pay attention to who becomes our next NC Chairman. Look at who our next MEC Chairman will be. And in your spare time, it wouldn't hurt to take another look at our CBA. Thanks, I feel better now.
Reply
Old 11-22-2008 | 07:33 AM
  #9  
Gunter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by nakazawa
Want a few more give-aways? Read the last two FCIFs on VTO BLGs, and then show me in our CBA where there's a waiver to the 13 credit hour split. I'll help you - read 25.D.1 and 25.D.2.

I know the Company is buying up lines - so . . . apply the 13 hour split to the low built line. I only have one 'rule-book' to work with - the CBA
Buy up effectively makes the lowest line 85. I don't know anyone else who thinks the 13 hr split should apply to a number other than 68 or 85.
Reply
Old 11-22-2008 | 07:42 AM
  #10  
nakazawa's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Continuing The Dream
Default

OCT VTO BLG cap for Captains was 74 ch in ANC. 68 +13 = 81. Low built ANC Captain line was 64:01 bought up to 68 ch. So . . . where did the 74 come from? NOV BLG cap for was 89:59, (85+13=98) and I believe MD-11 F/Os were capped under 90 CH for DEC. And . . . I'm not complaining that there's a cap, let's just make it CBA compliant and consistent so our VTO recipients know the rules. Either apply it to the low built line prior to buy-up, or to the min BLG guarantee. And contractually, there is NO cap. If the low built line was 90 - the high BLG could be 103. The rule is the 13 hour split.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captexpress
Cargo
48
11-07-2008 10:38 AM
captexpress
Cargo
7
11-04-2008 03:43 AM
captexpress
Cargo
56
10-30-2008 11:59 AM
Delco92
Cargo
127
10-28-2008 12:27 PM
grant123
Cargo
14
09-18-2008 09:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices