Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX Block 3 Update

Old 05-13-2009 | 10:22 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: M77C
Default FDX Block 3 Update

On a final note, the MEC at its April meeting started discussions on the continued viability of the management-built bid packs and the concern that is mounting within the MEC as to the safety and quality of these bid packs. The discussions centered around whether there might be a point in the future where PSIT reengagement in the line-building process is warranted even if the company is still directing lines to be built below the minimum bid period guarantee of 68/85CH. An important position that was voiced was that our PSIT can not only positively impact the quality of the lines now being built by the company but can, more importantly, positively affect the safety of these lines. This was balanced with the concern that our reentry into the line-building process would be complicit with the company’s application of 4.A.2.b or that the crew force will view it as such. I believe that anything the PSIT can do to increase the safety of our lines as well as improve their quality is a step we should take. Please contact me with your views on this issue.
Absolutely not! We should not be any part of a direct violation (improper implementation of 4.A.2.b.) to our collectively bargained agreement. Schedule safety can be easily addressed by exercising our contractual rights under 12.A.9. Fatigue. Now is the time to draw the line on the assault of our contract. We are professionals - let's act like it.

Last edited by FDXCapt; 05-13-2009 at 02:01 PM.
Reply
Old 05-13-2009 | 11:17 AM
  #2  
FR8Hauler's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Default

"I believe that anything the PSIT can do to increase the safety of our lines as well as improve their quality is a step we should take. Please contact me with your views on this issue."

I cannot believe a block rep would take this position! So ALPA is just going to "throw in the towel" like we have done on just about everything else lately? If the pairing is not safe call in fatigue when you are and don't fly it. Why you get paid the big bucks as a captain.
Reply
Old 05-13-2009 | 01:15 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Default

I wish I could believe that this will happen, however I know it will not. We have to many pilots that try to get the job done no matter what the circumstance. Fatigue? What is that, I don't want to upset the apple cart!!
Reply
Old 05-13-2009 | 02:01 PM
  #4  
MaydayMark's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,304
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 Captain
Default

I have strong feelings that the biggest threat we face on the next 5-10 years is fatigue/optimization (certainly related, maybe the same thing?). Our union MUST take a strong stand on fatigue issues.

Did you notice the fatigue issue in today's news concerning the Buffalo crash (it seems the f/o caught a j/s in from the west coast before beginning her trip, she was living with her parents because she was only earning $16,000/yr)?

Update: It seems the f/o took the FedEx redeye SEA-MEM-EWR to get to work ... she also had a second job at a copy shop (I expect for extra income?).

Last edited by MaydayMark; 05-13-2009 at 03:12 PM.
Reply
Old 05-13-2009 | 02:09 PM
  #5  
TurnAndBurn's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Tool Shed Investigator
Default

Originally Posted by MaydayMark

Did you notice the fatigue issue in today's news concerning the Buffalo crash (it seems the f/o caught a j/s in from the west coast before beginning her trip, she was living with her parents because she was only earning $16,000/yr)?

That statement, literally, makes me sick.
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 12:35 AM
  #6  
Micro's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Drinking from the fire hose
Default

Originally Posted by FDXCapt
Absolutely not! We should not be any part of a direct violation (improper implementation of 4.A.2.b.) to our collectively bargained agreement. Schedule safety can be easily addressed by exercising our contractual rights under 12.A.9. Fatigue. Now is the time to draw the line on the assault of our contract. We are professionals - let's act like it.
Originally Posted by FR8Hauler
"I believe that anything the PSIT can do to increase the safety of our lines as well as improve their quality is a step we should take. Please contact me with your views on this issue."

I cannot believe a block rep would take this position! So ALPA is just going to "throw in the towel" like we have done on just about everything else lately? If the pairing is not safe call in fatigue when you are and don't fly it. Why you get paid the big bucks as a captain.
You have a problem with my viewpoint?? Then write or call me directly and I'll discuss why I take this position vice posting here. I asked for input from my block and nothing has entered my mailbox. Even if you're not, I'll field any question or comment.
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 08:48 AM
  #7  
FR8Hauler's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Default

Micro I am not in your block but check your inbox here. My block rep probably gets tired of hearing from me...
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 09:08 PM
  #8  
Micro's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Drinking from the fire hose
Default

I have and you have a response in your mailbox. As I've said, if anyone has a question WHY I've taken the stance I have, contact me. Get ALL the info you can gather and make your decision. As the last line of the original quote says:

"Please contact me with your views on this issue. ".

ONLY one has. You (I include everyone who posts here as "you") want a voice in your union, you need to contact your reps vice just b!tch here (as I do as well at times)
Reply
Old 05-16-2009 | 10:08 AM
  #9  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 144
Likes: 2
From: MD11 FO
Default

So Micro......you're saying that if enough people voice their opinion in opposition to yours (of course they have to do it directly to your inbox) you will change your position on this?
Whether it's "*****ing" here or to your inbox, it's all the same.
Reply
Old 05-16-2009 | 10:48 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Default

No, it's not really the same. Faceless posting on the boards can sometimes more closely resemble mob rule than interaction with your union reps.

The board is mean to get the discussion in the open and get people involved, the direct e-mail or contact is how to contact the union reps.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CaptMidnight
Cargo
52
04-26-2009 05:49 PM
machz990
Cargo
19
04-10-2009 09:52 AM
NoHaz
Cargo
78
04-08-2009 07:19 PM
Peppy
Cargo
7
03-02-2009 01:04 PM
MD11Fr8Dog
Cargo
5
11-18-2008 08:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices