Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
IPA Legal Update:  IPA v. FAA/Cargo Airline A >

IPA Legal Update: IPA v. FAA/Cargo Airline A

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

IPA Legal Update: IPA v. FAA/Cargo Airline A

Old 02-15-2012, 02:29 PM
  #31  
Part Time Employee
 
MaxKts's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Default

Originally Posted by DLax85 View Post
I'm unfamiliar with your "EDW" trips, but if you are talking only 3 "hub turns" in a row, I believe that restriction was originally in the "proposed" rules, but did NOT make the final version.

Other's in the know please chime in....and I will look to double-check the new rules.

I do agree; however, that your IPA should answer these type of simple scheduling question immediately.
The "rule" is in there - sorta.

If you can get a minimum of 2 hours rest between hub turns you are not restricted to only 3 in a row.
MaxKts is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 03:58 AM
  #32  
Tri-tanic operator
 
CactusCrew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
Default

Originally Posted by MaxKts View Post
The "rule" is in there - sorta.

If you can get a minimum of 2 hours rest between hub turns you are not restricted to only 3 in a row.

Hey UPSFO4LIFE,

If you fly domestic sort trips, do many of our trips NOT have at least 2 hours on the ground during the sort ?

Not being a wise guy, just an unfamiliar international type who really doesn't know ...
CactusCrew is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 04:09 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

2 hours on the ground does not equal 2 hours rest though.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 08:33 AM
  #34  
Tri-tanic operator
 
CactusCrew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
2 hours on the ground does not equal 2 hours rest though.

Understood, but how is it written in the regs, that's the question ?
CactusCrew is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 09:08 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
2 hours on the ground does not equal 2 hours rest though.
Originally Posted by CactusCrew View Post
Understood, but how is it written in the regs, that's the question ?
Whats the difference?

"So let it be written...So let it be done.."
Busboy is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 09:13 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

That is a pretty good representation on how the white house sees Federal Regulators.

Think there was a burning bush in the oval office when they got their marching orders?
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 09:38 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Burning bush? They all have good medical insurance with prescription plans that cover that problem. So, I would have to guess, no.


(I couldn't decide which way to go on this...GW or this. But, I didn't want to make it political)
Busboy is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 12:56 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

Please, for the love of God, don't make this thread political, or the powers-what-be will close it down fo' sho'. And no religion too.

JJ
Jetjok is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 02:25 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,191
Default

Originally Posted by CactusCrew View Post
Hey UPSFO4LIFE,

If you fly domestic sort trips, do many of our trips NOT have at least 2 hours on the ground during the sort ?

Not being a wise guy, just an unfamiliar international type who really doesn't know ...
I think the argument/concern that "the new rules will end commuting as we know it" has proven to be untrue.

During the final rule making process the cargo companies influenced the regs enough to allow the hub turning to continue.

They did that in case they were not successful in getting the "cut out"...or if the "cut out" was subsequently overturned.
DLax85 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
Priority 3
Cargo
88
05-04-2010 02:57 PM
Winged Wheeler
Money Talk
1
09-14-2009 06:03 PM
31wins
Cargo
181
09-25-2007 05:17 PM
Priority 3
Cargo
0
09-24-2007 08:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices