Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums - Find your next job as a Pilot > >
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines
 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-26-2012, 01:10 PM   #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
CloudSailor's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,649
Default FDX: Preferential Bidding

From the union:

"The Company provided a Section 25 (Scheduling) proposal. Most noteworthy, the proposal contained a form of Preferential Bidding, which would function system-wide."

For starters, it would be the END of vacation as we know it. And unfortunately, that might be the least of our worries with pref bidding. Inform yourself! Talk with friends at pax carriers who now have pref bidding. Hopefully FedElta will post regarding his experience with pref bidding vs. line bidding, as he has done in the past. Please, inform your block rep of your opinion on pref bidding.

If pref bidding is in any way, shape, or form, in the next CBA, my vote will be an automatic NO, without reading anything else in the contract.

Last edited by CloudSailor; 10-26-2012 at 01:30 PM.
CloudSailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 01:22 PM   #2  
Line Holder
 
BadgerBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Missionary
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CloudSailor View Post

If pref bidding is in any way, shape, or form, in the next CBA, my vote will be an automatic NO, without reading anything else in the contract.
I'm with you a 100% CloudSailor, As I posted in the "contract thoughts" thread, "JUST SAY NO!"
BadgerBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 01:33 PM   #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rocket Bob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: B-747-400 FO
Posts: 300
Default

This would be a non-starter.. This is the single greatest thing UPS and FedEx has compared to any other pilot group. Just say no, whatever they offer in return isn't worth it. Picture those 7 day vacation blocks...surrounded by 70 hours of flying, awesome.
Rocket Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 01:36 PM   #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 322
Default

Absolutely positively, NO. This is a fight the company does not want to fight!!!!!
Full pull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 01:47 PM   #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 247
Default

Just read the message too, PBS would be a killer for our schedules. We thought be ing squeezed by the optimizer was bad. PBS would kill our vacation plus the ability to have large blocks of time off. With PBS they would break up a lot of the larger trips and turn them into small ones that would give you your one and seven in domicile and would turn efficiency for the company to inefficiency for you. Everyone one would have min days off.

Not to mention the productivity gains to the company would cause everyone stagnate once again. I am sure the senior guys are pushing for it. Watch out what you wish for. Who's schedule can be opitimized more? Junior or senior guys?

PBS=No vote
max8222 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 01:55 PM   #6  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
CloudSailor's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,649
Default

Now just in from the union MEC:

"To be clear - We, your MEC, Negotiating team and Officers, are not entertaining PBS. It is a non-starter."

I hope it is as clear as that statement sounds.
CloudSailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 01:58 PM   #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyByNite's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Captain
Posts: 153
Default

Automatic NO vote on any agreement that includes any "form" of PBS! Also of note, a special thank you to the FedEx management team for unifying and sparking the interest of the crew force more than 50 updates and special message lines.

Last edited by FlyByNite; 10-26-2012 at 02:07 PM. Reason: spelling
FlyByNite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 02:07 PM   #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Overnitefr8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 767 CA
Posts: 1,752
Default

Just say "NO"
Overnitefr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 02:11 PM   #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Skimmology's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Professional Commuter
Posts: 248
Default

As they asked in the email. Call your rep!!! Tell them no!
Skimmology is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2012, 02:15 PM   #10  
Line Holder
 
zulu's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: A300 CA
Posts: 61
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyByNite View Post
Also of note, a special thank you to the FedEx management team for unifying and sparking the interest of the crew force ...
Exactly what I was thinking.
zulu is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply
 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FDX - Preferential bidding coming? magic rat Cargo 83 05-05-2012 05:51 PM
Corporate Air Bleeds Purple vagabond Cargo 83 07-14-2010 07:27 AM
FDX Bidding when going to training whiskeytalkin Cargo 9 10-03-2008 11:38 AM
Preferential Bidding....Good or Bad??? Flyboy8784 Regional 30 09-02-2008 01:27 PM
Preferential Bidding System MikeB525 Major 2 08-26-2007 06:33 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:34 PM.


vBulletin® v3.9.3.5, Copyright ©2000-2019, MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright 2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1