Normal FedEx Approach??
#131
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
The decision to continue a safe approach is not the same as saying they did nothing wrong. I dont know if they did anything wrong I dont have the evidence. But as a hypothetical, being unstable at 500 feet but working towards stable by 400 feet can be wrong and safe at the same time. Just as holding your mask on your lap at 260 is (I dont condone that practice either).
#132
The decision to continue a safe approach is not the same as saying they did nothing wrong. I dont know if they did anything wrong I dont have the evidence. But as a hypothetical, being unstable at 500 feet but working towards stable by 400 feet can be wrong and safe at the same time. Just as holding your mask on your lap at 260 is (I dont condone that practice either).
If you are honestly trying to make your approach stable and at 1,000/500 feet but the flaps are still in motion, the gear is in transit, or your speed is still slowing to approach speed, you have to ask yourself if you have this thing under control and how much longer will it take to be stabilized. My rule is all configuration changes definitely need to be initiated before 1,000 feet and speed must be set by 500 feet.
#133
Had that problem in IAD. First they assigned 250 when I was 12nm out. Then at 10nm they gave me 170. Like you, I aim to be stabilized by 1,000 and was. On 1nm final tower tells me to speed up. The captain politely tells him to stuff it and the tower complains that we went back to final approach speed 3 miles out! I couldn't care less. I fly by the book and could care less if that makes ATC slow down traffic behind me.
Good plan never let ATC fly your aircraft for you simply say unable or we require runway 36 for operational reasons etc.
#138
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




