Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - B-767 - LOA or ELSE! >

FDX - B-767 - LOA or ELSE!

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - B-767 - LOA or ELSE!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2013 | 06:53 AM
  #41  
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HKFlyr
We are in Section 6 negotiations under the RLA.

The company has to follow the contract with regards to bringing new aircraft on the property. And we have a process if we disagree. This isn't gloom and doom if we don't roll over with a quickly agreed upon LOA. (Like buying something, if you have to do it immediately or the deal is off, I'm suspect - and that is when I walk off the lot)

Giving them an LOA that isn't part of a CBA - our whole CBA - is again giving them a pass.

Just say no. Lets actually show some unity for a change with a no vote.

It would be even better if no one bid it, or (gasp) ALPA actually said "don't bid it". But some might take that as being confrontational. (and we wouldn't want to be confrontational)

Who ever said no half deals is right. NO NOPE NADA BUBKIS ZIP.
How did our Saying "NO" work with the 777 integration?

How did that arbitration Work out in our favor?

If you recall we were in Negotiations then too ( 4a2b) just not Section 6
I have no idea what is in this LOA or what it says.

If, it solidifies the 767 as a WB aircraft and allows for a seniority based
system, it is worth at least considering.

If you really think there is "Leverage" here, what do you think would happen if the Company posted a 767 Bid tomorrow and said it was a NB?(as they can contractually do).
Reference all the 767 lanyards being worn. Reference all the WB Pilots who downbid to the 757 on the last 2 small bids.

As a history buff, I recall many 777 lanyards being worn too a few years back......hey it is just another WB.

You can certainly decide now to Vote NO. That is your right.

Me, I will at least read what is sent out and make an informed decision then.
Reply
Old 03-15-2013 | 07:24 AM
  #42  
Gunter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
If we give the company everything it wants with a bunch of LOAs it then becomes less important to them to negotiate what we want in the CBA.
I see what you are trying to point out now.

While it's important to review the 777 issue we had, 767 negotiations are a totally different animal. The basic pay rate was a prime concern then. This time it's about everything but the basic pay rate.

Last edited by Gunter; 03-15-2013 at 07:34 AM.
Reply
Old 03-15-2013 | 10:23 AM
  #43  
KnightFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Default

I think 1st over is pretty close. If it's a good deal it's better to lock it in with an LOA now.
Reply
Old 03-15-2013 | 10:30 AM
  #44  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: md11 fo
Default

I think considering this as an LOA vs part of a greater CBA is outstanding. It essentially affords us the opportunity to consider it as a stand alone issue rather than lumped in with a larger "take-it-or-leave-it" CBA. If we could, I'd prefer to vote each sub-section of the contract individually. This is one of those chances.
Reply
Old 03-15-2013 | 11:18 AM
  #45  
KnightFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Default

your MEC unanimously approved the B767 tentative agreement as a Letter of Agreement (LOA). Posted on the website.

Last edited by KnightFlyer; 03-15-2013 at 11:41 AM.
Reply
Old 03-15-2013 | 11:41 AM
  #46  
MaydayMark's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,304
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 Captain
Default

fantmdave,

I have mixed feeling on this one. I could argue that 'if' it's a good deal (our MEC must think so?) that we should take it before it gets negotiated into a deal that isn't as good - or - I could argue that if the company wants this bad enough to offer a good deal that maybe we could (should?) use that (leverage?) to help expedite a COMPLETE TA in a timely manner

It would be nice to get a TA in a timely manner instead of 2-3 years from now ...

Last edited by MaydayMark; 03-15-2013 at 12:09 PM.
Reply
Old 03-15-2013 | 11:53 AM
  #47  
The Walrus's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
From: Socket Drawer
Default

The TA is posted on the alpa website.
Reply
Old 03-15-2013 | 11:53 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Default

Crew bus rumors seem to be as accurate as ever.
Reply
Old 03-15-2013 | 01:01 PM
  #49  
cgflier's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: CAPT
Default

So if I'm reading this right, the company gets to keep reserves at narrow body pay unless they use them for a 767 flight. How is this a good deal for us?
Reply
Old 03-15-2013 | 01:07 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cgflier
So if I'm reading this right, the company gets to keep reserves at narrow body pay unless they use them for a 767 flight. How is this a good deal for us?
first read, it appears the 767 will have reserves and the 757 also will have reserves but they will be combined into one group for assignments. A 757 reserve will get 767 pay if they fly a 767 bid pack trip as it reads.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Snarge
United
57
02-12-2013 06:33 AM
Zoro
Cargo
32
07-26-2012 06:32 AM
Dadof6
Cargo
16
01-30-2008 06:56 AM
skypine27
Cargo
0
07-19-2007 06:36 AM
TonyM
Cargo
5
07-04-2007 08:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices