Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - B-767 - LOA or ELSE! >

FDX - B-767 - LOA or ELSE!

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - B-767 - LOA or ELSE!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2013, 04:23 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
OKLATEX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: B767 FO
Posts: 421
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter View Post
It's not about keeping work rules. It's about figuring out how to integrate, or keep separate, the 767 and 757. Especially for pay purposes.

Until that is ironed out you won't see me bid the thing. I'd hate to be senior enough to hold a 767 line but end up flying sub trips at the 757 rate.

IMHO a combined 767/757 reserve system is in our future. How that gets paid, at the wide body or narrow body rate, needs to be agreed upon.
No kidding!

That's the whole point of the negotiations and a TA.

Last edited by OKLATEX; 03-14-2013 at 04:35 PM.
OKLATEX is offline  
Old 03-14-2013, 04:37 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 270
Default

Heard on the crew bus that there will be a bid for the initial crews for the round dial 767. Then, there will be two seperate bidpacks and senority list for each aircraft for additional bids. You will either be in the 767 bidpack or 757 bidpack. 767 bidpack may have 757 flying, but will be paid as a widebody as well as widebody for reserve and vacation. 757 bidpack will pay narrowbody for vacation and reserve. It may have 767 flying, but only the trip with 767 flying will be paid widebody. This was all heard secondhand, so I can't say how accurate it is. Also heard the LOA will only cover the round dial bid and the contract will cover everything else. In any case, we'll probably know more from the union within the next few days....hopefully.
1st overnite is offline  
Old 03-14-2013, 06:12 PM
  #33  
Line Holder
 
Velcro Captain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: 757
Posts: 42
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by 1st overnite View Post
Heard on the crew bus that there will be a bid for the initial crews for the round dial 767. Then, there will be two seperate bidpacks and senority list for each aircraft for additional bids. You will either be in the 767 bidpack or 757 bidpack. 767 bidpack may have 757 flying, but will be paid as a widebody as well as widebody for reserve and vacation. 757 bidpack will pay narrowbody for vacation and reserve. It may have 767 flying, but only the trip with 767 flying will be paid widebody. This was all heard secondhand, so I can't say how accurate it is. Also heard the LOA will only cover the round dial bid and the contract will cover everything else. In any case, we'll probably know more from the union within the next few days....hopefully.

If true, just be careful to turn your speakers down before clicking an open-time 767 trip or the "giant sucking sound" might damage your ears.
Velcro Captain is offline  
Old 03-14-2013, 07:10 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 329
Default

Pretty sure I know how I feel about someone with their butt in the same seat, flying the same legs, but getting WB pay...But maybe the twenty or so super-duper senior guys who will be able to hold it will be able to convince 68% of the guys that it's a swell plan? Maybe we can give them an extra 1/2 stripe so we wouldn't confuse them with us normal 75 guys.
av8rmike is offline  
Old 03-14-2013, 10:57 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Default

Originally Posted by av8rmike View Post
Pretty sure I know how I feel about someone with their butt in the same seat, flying the same legs, but getting WB pay...But maybe the twenty or so super-duper senior guys who will be able to hold it will be able to convince 68% of the guys that it's a swell plan? Maybe we can give them an extra 1/2 stripe so we wouldn't confuse them with us normal 75 guys.
What you said. I'm going to choose to believe that's a bad rumor. It's about as convoluted as the substitution decision matrix. Maybe they'll issue a separate iPad to help 75/76 guys figure out what pay scale they're on.
Rock is offline  
Old 03-15-2013, 06:24 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by av8rmike View Post
Pretty sure I know how I feel about someone with their butt in the same seat, flying the same legs, but getting WB pay...But maybe the twenty or so super-duper senior guys who will be able to hold it will be able to convince 68% of the guys that it's a swell plan? Maybe we can give them an extra 1/2 stripe so we wouldn't confuse them with us normal 75 guys.
You have that situation now, with Pilots who are on Passover Pay.
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 03-15-2013, 06:39 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 260
Default Just Say NO!

We are in Section 6 negotiations under the RLA.

The company has to follow the contract with regards to bringing new aircraft on the property. And we have a process if we disagree. This isn't gloom and doom if we don't roll over with a quickly agreed upon LOA. (Like buying something, if you have to do it immediately or the deal is off, I'm suspect - and that is when I walk off the lot)

Giving them an LOA that isn't part of a CBA - our whole CBA - is again giving them a pass.

Just say no. Lets actually show some unity for a change with a no vote.

It would be even better if no one bid it, or (gasp) ALPA actually said "don't bid it". But some might take that as being confrontational. (and we wouldn't want to be confrontational)

Who ever said no half deals is right. NO NOPE NADA BUBKIS ZIP.
HKFlyr is offline  
Old 03-15-2013, 06:39 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r View Post
You have that situation now, with Pilots who are on Passover Pay.
So, if things go horribly wrong, we'll still have POP eligible guys bidding the 767 (Flex and LCA types) who will fly with newhires coming to it.

At least we have that going for us.
Gunter is offline  
Old 03-15-2013, 06:45 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by HKFlyr View Post

Giving them an LOA that isn't part of a CBA - our whole CBA - is again giving them a pass.

Just say no.

Who ever said no half deals is right.
Someone is going to have to explain how a deal in LOA form is different than possibly the same deal in CBA clothing.

How is it Half?
Gunter is offline  
Old 03-15-2013, 06:50 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter View Post
Someone is going to have to explain how a deal in LOA form is different than possibly the same deal in CBA clothing.

How is it Half?
If we give the company everything it wants with a bunch of LOAs it then becomes less important to them to negotiate what we want in the CBA.
FDXLAG is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Snarge
United
56
02-12-2013 06:33 AM
Zoro
Cargo
32
07-26-2012 06:32 AM
Dadof6
Cargo
16
01-30-2008 06:56 AM
skypine27
Cargo
0
07-19-2007 06:36 AM
TonyM
Cargo
5
07-04-2007 08:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices