Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Union vs Non-Union

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2013 | 10:38 AM
  #61  
Sideshow Bob's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: MD11 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Radials Rule
I see it as rank and file workers negotiating with management. The employer/employee relationship is still there. Saying that police, teachers etc. is the government is a stretch. Thus, no conflict of interest.
Except the management isn't negotiating with THEIR money as a private entity does. The "management" (government POLS) are "bargaining" with monies (taxes) taken in a progressive percentage system under the threat of sanction and imprisonment from others (taxpayers). The "rank and file" (public union members) returns some percentage of those monies to the "management" (government POLS) in the form of political contributions from the public unions (involuntarily from their members), often in exchange for preferential treatment from the very people they are negotiating with.

For example:

"SEIU alone has spent at least $187 million through combined lobbying, PAC and 527 group donations and expenses on candidates and policy issues – nearly 100% of which went to liberal policy initiatives and candidates."

So taxpayer money is funneled back to the very politicians "management" who are negotiating contracts with the "rank and file". The more the "rank and file " gets in negotiations with "managment", the more "management" gets back. Good thing the "corporation" has a budget surplus...oh wait...they don't.

What could possibly go wrong?
Reply
Old 06-27-2013 | 12:43 PM
  #62  
dckozak's Avatar
done, gone skiing
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 0
From: Rocking chair
Default

Originally Posted by MD11Fr8Dog
The problem with public sectors unions, is that it's government negotiating with the government. Do you all not see the conflicts of interest?
So to follow this analogy, since I ( and many other FedEx pilots) own FedEx stock, we should negotiate to reduce pilot pay and benefits as the cost burden adversely affects the value of my investment in FedEx.
Reply
Old 06-27-2013 | 12:56 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by dckozak
So to follow this analogy, since I ( and many other FedEx pilots) own FedEx stock, we should negotiate to reduce pilot pay and benefits as the cost burden adversely affects the value of my investment in FedEx.
Your analogy doesn't float. If you made more on the stocks then you did on the job I would suspect you wouldn't mind seeing a little more give back from the employee group. The simple question is do we collude or compete with management? Do we chip big bucks towards Fred Smith to keep him on the board?
Reply
Old 06-27-2013 | 12:58 PM
  #64  
Sideshow Bob's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: MD11 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by dckozak
So to follow this analogy, since I ( and many other FedEx pilots) own FedEx stock, we should negotiate to reduce pilot pay and benefits as the cost burden adversely affects the value of my investment in FedEx.
It depends on your priorities and position in FDX stock I suppose.

If you stand to gain more from contract enhancements, negotiate for more pay. If you stand to gain more from the stock, advocate for your NC to lay down...pretty simple really.

As shareholders in our municipalities, states and nation I suppose we need to weigh the same priorities. Unless you are also a member of SEIU I suppose you'd lean towards taxpayer value.

Oh...can you imagine a situation where SEIU would stand with FDX ALPA if you get into a beef with Fred? Will you give them anything more than lip service should they get into a beef with Obama? Which of course will never happen.

So...perhaps it's all symbolism over substance?

Say it ain't so.
Reply
Old 06-27-2013 | 01:26 PM
  #65  
MaxKts's Avatar
Part Time Employee
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Default

Originally Posted by dckozak
So to follow this analogy, since I ( and many other FedEx pilots) own FedEx stock, we should negotiate to reduce pilot pay and benefits as the cost burden adversely affects the value of my investment in FedEx.
To use your analogy - paying taxes is like buying stock! If that were the case - I would have stopped investing (stopped paying taxes) long ago. There just isn't a good enough return on my investment!
Reply
Old 06-27-2013 | 02:10 PM
  #66  
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
...Whatever It Is!
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dckozak
So to follow this analogy, since I ( and many other FedEx pilots) own FedEx stock, we should negotiate to reduce pilot pay and benefits as the cost burden adversely affects the value of my investment in FedEx.
You're not required to buy stock, you are required to pay taxes!
Reply
Old 06-27-2013 | 08:24 PM
  #67  
Radials Rule's Avatar
Rubber dogsh#t out of HKG
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 638
Likes: 2
From: Senior Seat Cushion Tester Extraordinaire
Default

Originally Posted by FrankTheTank
For tax dollars!
Well, yes. Your point please?
Reply
Old 06-27-2013 | 08:52 PM
  #68  
Radials Rule's Avatar
Rubber dogsh#t out of HKG
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 638
Likes: 2
From: Senior Seat Cushion Tester Extraordinaire
Default

Originally Posted by Sideshow Bob
Except the management isn't negotiating with THEIR money as a private entity does. The "management" (government POLS) are "bargaining" with monies (taxes) taken in a progressive percentage system under the threat of sanction and imprisonment from others (taxpayers). The "rank and file" (public union members) returns some percentage of those monies to the "management" (government POLS) in the form of political contributions from the public unions (involuntarily from their members), often in exchange for preferential treatment from the very people they are negotiating with.

However, management is bargaining with a budget. How that budget is funded is irrelevant for this discussion's purposes.

Originally Posted by Sideshow Bob
For example:

"SEIU alone has spent at least $187 million through combined lobbying, PAC and 527 group donations and expenses on candidates and policy issues – nearly 100% of which went to liberal policy initiatives and candidates."

Liberal policy initiatives are often more suited to organized labor..no mystery there. The bigger picture and culprit is lobbying in general.

So taxpayer money is funneled back to the very politicians "management" who are negotiating contracts with the "rank and file". The more the "rank and file " gets in negotiations with "managment", the more "management" gets back. Good thing the "corporation" has a budget surplus...oh wait...they don't.
I suppose you‘re correct in a far-removed, very general and esoteric sense. But esoteric doesn't cut the mustard.

The bottom line is that society benefits from public education, infrastructure, police, etc. There is a price to pay. Is it perfect? Heck no. But the corruption is not a default of the existence of public sector unions, its structure and/or public sector workers exercising their right to organize. The house cleaning needs to be done at many other levels. The easy way out of throwing the baby out with the bathwater doesn't address the cause, only politically perceived symptoms and insidious instant gratification.
Reply
Old 06-28-2013 | 08:53 AM
  #69  
FrankTheTank's Avatar
Fill'er Up Again
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
From: Scarebus Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Radials Rule
Well, yes. Your point please?
If you can't see the difference between bargaining for corporate dollars versus tax dollars, I can't help you see my point of view!


And in response to your response to Sideshow. Management is bargaining with a budget that is not funded! Just Look across the states, cities, and federal level at unfunded liabilities! But they still sign those contracts and promise to find the money later! You're right if it were funded then how its funded is not relevant but since it isn't funded, then how you fund it becomes relevant!
Reply
Old 06-28-2013 | 08:58 AM
  #70  
Sideshow Bob's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: MD11 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by FrankTheTank
If you can't see the difference between bargaining for corporate dollars versus tax dollars, I can't help you see my point of view!


And in response to your response to Sideshow. Management is bargaining with a budget that is not funded! Just Look across the states, cities, and federal level at unfunded liabilities! But they still sign those contracts and promise to find the money later!
Frank:

You get it, but Radial obviously doesn't. The unfunded liabilities for the federal government alone is well over $90 trillion, and even with virtually zero interest (which can't last forever), is growing beyond reach.

Oh well...unicorns and rainbows forever.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Union Talk
0
07-13-2009 05:45 PM
Boogie Nights
Union Talk
22
04-14-2009 09:10 PM
GW258
Union Talk
0
01-19-2009 07:47 AM
Ellen
Regional
193
09-21-2007 06:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices