Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Union vs Non-Union

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2013, 05:53 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
appDude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 613
Default

Originally Posted by FrankTheTank View Post
Not all unions are the same! I do not believe in public unions that fight for taxpayer dollars and not corporate dollars.
Exactly.
The system was never set up for the cronyism between government worker unions and politicians.
It is one of the things ruining governments form city to state to federal.
appDude is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 06:10 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by Cargo Man View Post
Just looked the cargo section.
Almost all union airlines have people on furlough; almost all non-union airlines have no furloughs. Why?
FDX would see a big furlough if they imposed PBS. Not to mention a tremendous loss of our quality of life. We would NEVER get that back. The only thing keeping them from doing it is a union.

There is often no reasoning with management. Look at FDX. Instead of getting what we are telling them they are "rolling up sleeves for better communication". Despite the Message Lines, FCIFs, blog and BBQ events, they just know the way out of the impasse is to find another way to get their message across. They really think we aren't listening when, in fact, it is they who need to learn how to listen. Reminds me of a Captain or two.

"If the checklist sideways, I do not want you to talk"

Last edited by Gunter; 06-26-2013 at 06:31 AM.
Gunter is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 07:57 AM
  #33  
done, gone skiing
 
dckozak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Rocking chair
Posts: 1,601
Default

Originally Posted by FrankTheTank View Post
Not all unions are the same! I do not believe in public unions that fight for taxpayer dollars and not corporate dollars.
I'm curious, what rights do you think public employees should have? Should they be just right to work? Most local budgets are voted on at the local level, (where I am) the schools in particular. If the will of the people is to cut education spending (or just vote NO on any budget presented) and is cut, say 25%, should all staff just be obliged to take a pay cut? If you or someone you know and love worked in government, would you think its fair that they have no right to bargain for pay and benefits? Of course elected officials would never put whats best for the community above their own political desires.

I understand the need for safety related positions to not be jeopardized by a strike, but is it fair that you should be able to negotiate with your employer but your son's school teacher not?
dckozak is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 08:21 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
...When I joined FedEx, most of the pilots I knew (particularly the military) were glad to be in a union and didn't mind paying their 2% as they thought it was a good bargain...
Particularly the military?

That's a good one.
Busboy is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 08:29 AM
  #35  
Fill'er Up Again
 
FrankTheTank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Scarebus Captain
Posts: 1,089
Default

Originally Posted by dckozak View Post
I'm curious, what rights do you think public employees should have? Should they be just right to work? Most local budgets are voted on at the local level, (where I am) the schools in particular. If the will of the people is to cut education spending (or just vote NO on any budget presented) and is cut, say 25%, should all staff just be obliged to take a pay cut? If you or someone you know and love worked in government, would you think its fair that they have no right to bargain for pay and benefits? Of course elected officials would never put whats best for the community above their own political desires.

I understand the need for safety related positions to not be jeopardized by a strike, but is it fair that you should be able to negotiate with your employer but your son's school teacher not?
Where I live there are 2 school systems, one is unionized and one is not. Wanna guess which has better teachers. Here's a hint: it ain't the teachers union. Guess all those private school teachers aren't making a livable wage.

Negotiating with tax payer money should not be legal!

And unionized is more than just the power to strike. Should "workers" be treated fairly and paid fairly, you bet. The military is not unionized, how do they survive? That is why they have SOPs for lack of a better term. If you don't like it don't apply. Look for work elsewhere or something more fitting with your risk/reward ideals!

They do have rights and should they not agree with those outlined, quit and move on. And if those agreed rights are infringed on then a lawsuit should be filed and should be an easy win!
FrankTheTank is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 08:41 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sideshow Bob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: MD11 CPT
Posts: 1,077
Default

Originally Posted by dckozak View Post
I'm curious, what rights do you think public employees should have? Should they be just right to work? Most local budgets are voted on at the local level, (where I am) the schools in particular. If the will of the people is to cut education spending (or just vote NO on any budget presented) and is cut, say 25%, should all staff just be obliged to take a pay cut? If you or someone you know and love worked in government, would you think its fair that they have no right to bargain for pay and benefits? Of course elected officials would never put whats best for the community above their own political desires.

I understand the need for safety related positions to not be jeopardized by a strike, but is it fair that you should be able to negotiate with your employer but your son's school teacher not?
Public employee and teacher's unions now have a mob-like quality, and are very different from in particular unions governed by the RLA. But beyond that, they in some ways are a public and moral hazard.

For starters, they virtually all work on behalf of bankrupt entities. California is a classic example. My neighbor is an engineer on the over 300% over budget, several years late Bay Bridge. His retirement is effectively 100% of his ending salary and he gets free medical for life...something WE could never dream of. And unlike FDX and UPS, they are beyond broke and getting worse everyday. If they choose to go on strike, they just go...there is no RLA to stop them, and like teachers hold everybody effectively hostage, constantly telling us we need to pay more taxes so they can continue to get raises we can only dream of. NEA, SEIU and the like are the ONLY unions that get any support from this administration. The only thing we have going for us is we work for immensely profitable companies...well, until that same administration starts it's coming jihad on oil, and it's coming.

In the eyes of Joe six-pack and the government we are NOT union...anybody who thinks otherwise is deluded.
Sideshow Bob is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 09:12 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by Busboy View Post
Particularly the military?

That's a good one.
Why yes of the 5 military pilots in my class all were glad to be apprentice members of the FPA. Especially when the mustached dudes bought us drinks. Military members are not stupid; coming from a background were the company was always right, Uncle Sugars way or the highway, yes they were glad to members of a union. I remember a couple of the civilians were not overly found of Alpa, though.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 09:44 AM
  #38  
Bourgeoisie
 
MEMFO4Ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 787 SO
Posts: 616
Default

Originally Posted by Sideshow Bob View Post
Public employee and teacher's unions now have a mob-like quality, and are very different from in particular unions governed by the RLA. But beyond that, they in some ways are a public and moral hazard.

If they choose to go on strike, they just go...there is no RLA to stop them, and like teachers hold everybody effectively hostage...
Wouldn't it be great if we had this kind of leverage.

Moral hazard? It's just about basic human greed. No different than the power hungry types at the top of the public food chain.
MEMFO4Ever is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 10:09 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sideshow Bob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: MD11 CPT
Posts: 1,077
Default

Originally Posted by MEMFO4Ever View Post
Wouldn't it be great if we had this kind of leverage.

Moral hazard? It's just about basic human greed. No different than the power hungry types at the top of the public food chain.
At the public school up the street leading up to a bond issue, teachers were brain washing the kids that they better pressure their parents to vote for massive tax increases, and using teaching time to do so. The majority of the windfall of those taxes solely funded their retirement...the classroom got little of that money.

THAT is a moral hazard if ever I've seen one.
Sideshow Bob is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 02:24 PM
  #40  
done, gone skiing
 
dckozak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Rocking chair
Posts: 1,601
Default

Originally Posted by FrankTheTank View Post
Where I live there are 2 school systems, one is unionized and one is not. Wanna guess which has better teachers. Here's a hint: it ain't the teachers union. Guess all those private school teachers aren't making a livable wage.
Let me guess.... you have a child in a private school. So what rationale would you have for paying for what free down the road other than.... bashing the public institution.

Originally Posted by Sideshow Bob View Post
Public employee and teacher's unions now have a mob-like quality, and are very different from in particular unions governed by the RLA. But beyond that, they in some ways are a public and moral hazard.
I can see the mob like qualities of the teachers in our local school system. They beat the students, and each other if you don't play by the rules. One of the dumbest analogies I've read on APC, and I've read some real winners.


Originally Posted by Sideshow Bob View Post
At the public school up the street leading up to a bond issue, teachers were brain washing the kids that they better pressure their parents to vote for massive tax increases, and using teaching time to do so. The majority of the windfall of those taxes solely funded their retirement...the classroom got little of that money.

THAT is a moral hazard if ever I've seen one.
Of course teachers brainwash students, teaching all that science and stuff. More un substantiated BS.

We know all public unions are bad (especially teacher unions)
All public employees are lazy, over paid and have way too much time off. Government is the problem. I know because FOX news saids so, and you know they don't lie because they tell you they are "fair and balanced" . Case closed
dckozak is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Union Talk
0
07-13-2009 05:45 PM
Boogie Nights
Union Talk
22
04-14-2009 09:10 PM
GW258
Union Talk
0
01-19-2009 07:47 AM
Ellen
Regional
193
09-21-2007 06:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices