Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
MEM midnight crew dismantled >

MEM midnight crew dismantled

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

MEM midnight crew dismantled

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2006, 08:46 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Austin Tower
Posts: 175
Default

Busdrivr,

Originally Posted by Busdrivr View Post
You guys in the MEM Tower/TRACON are awsome. I've flown 21 years out of MEM during the inbound and outbound launch, and I'm still amaized at the job you do and your level of professionalism.
Thanks for the kind words -- I'll pass your message along to everyone at work.

The vast majority of the Controllers at MEM love the job. Many of us did not have the "Right Stuff" to become military or commercial pilots -- so we opted for the next best thing: ATC!

I believe the solution to your problem will be in the form of a phone call from Fred Smith wanting to know what the hell is going on over there when the inevitable ATC delays start in January.
Hopefully things will not change in a drastic way. I can tell you that there has been much discussion among the Controllers at work about the situation. Some folks do not like to work the midnight FDX operation; some have a very difficult time staying up all night; while others have family conflicts with this type of schedule.

As for the "delays", I'm sure that Fred will have something to say if and when the operation starts to drag out. We'll do our best. Plus, we should have a token former midnight shift Controller on nearly each midnight shift to point us in the right direction.

MEM_ATC
AUS_ATC is offline  
Old 12-12-2006, 08:48 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Freightbird's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: A300 Capt
Posts: 156
Default

Keep us informed of how your crew likes the change. I am printing this one to keep/ Thanks for posting it.
Freightbird is offline  
Old 12-12-2006, 08:58 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Austin Tower
Posts: 175
Default

Ptarmigan,

Originally Posted by ptarmigan View Post
Was there a reason given behind the change?
We were advised that everyone needed to rotate through all shifts at the facility. FAA Management wants us to work days, nights and midnight shifts so that we will be familiar with each and every aspect of the operation.

The unspoken word, is that MEM Management has wanted to dismantle the midnight crew for a number of years. The midnight crew is looked upon as renegades for the type of work that they perform. For some reason, they have been the focus of attention for a long time.

My personal belief, is that it's just about control. FAA Management wants to control each and evey aspect of our employment with their new Imposed Work Rules.

MEM_ATC
AUS_ATC is offline  
Old 12-12-2006, 09:06 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Austin Tower
Posts: 175
Default

JetJocF14,

Originally Posted by JetJocF14 View Post
Now you need to look twice both ways when crossing 27. Wouldn't be surprised if a new controller screws that one up a few times.
There are a number of Controllers who do not like the use of RWY 27 during the FDX midnight outbound operation. The current midnight crew has been working it for years, and they are completely comfortable with this operation.

I'm not sure where these decisions are made, but the use of RWY 27 comes from far up the food chain within FDX and the FAA. I've never seen it in writing, but have been verbally informed, that RWY 27 is a money saving runway for FDX, and we will continue to use it. FDX "programs" and our local procedures mandate that FDX aircraft from specific "Spots" will depart RWY 27.

I suppose the allure of departing the runway that is only a few hundred yards away from your gate -vs- taxiing three miles and waiting in line is just too much to take sometimes.

MEM_ATC
AUS_ATC is offline  
Old 12-12-2006, 02:33 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilotpip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by MEM_ATC View Post

The vast majority of the Controllers at MEM love the job. Many of us did not have the "Right Stuff" to become military or commercial pilots -- so we opted for the next best thing: ATC!
I had an ATC class in college. Spent about 45 minutes in front of a simulator and couldn't handle more than 5 planes at one time.

We as pilots only have to worry about keeping our plane doing what it's supposed to do. You guys can be responsible for dozens at the same time. Thanks! I'm not too pleased with the way you guys are getting jerked around right now but know that I appreciate what you do to keep us from running into each other.
Pilotpip is online now  
Old 12-12-2006, 06:25 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Austin Tower
Posts: 175
Default

Nitefrater,

Originally Posted by Nitefrater View Post
From the NASA ASRS website:

"The ASRS collects, analyzes, and responds to voluntarily submitted aviation safety incident reports in order to lessen the likelihood of aviation accidents."

For my part, I'm gonna be especially vigilant around KMEM, and submit one of these puppies when warranted. It's not just a CYA card, and KMEM is hazardous enough even when the first string is running the show.

I wonder what impact a flood of ASRS reports would have on this sort of policy?
There are a number of Controllers at MEM who have been documenting many procedural and safety concerns within our facility. Locally, this documentation is being made in the form of NASA ASRS reports and FAA Unsatisfactory Condition Reports (UCR). At the Regional and National level, we are forwarding all of this information to our Regional and National Safety Committee members for their action.

To date, none of the NASA reports have materialized in the NASA ASRS database system, but acknowledgement receipts have been received by the numerous Controllers who have submitted reports. The FAA has yet to respond to any individual who submitted a UCR. If something tragic ever happens here, we will at least be able to pull out some paperwork and say, "See... we told ya".

The online system at NASA works great for submitting reports. We are now able to unplug from the sector and complete a NASA report while taking a break and the information is fresh in our head.

I would encourage all pilots to file reports on unsafe conditions that you observe (at MEM or elsewhere), or even on issues that relate to ATC service. Many of the "service" related aspects of our job are mandated by management. Controllers must utitlize the airspace and operational procedures that FAA Management gives us.

If the problem is not documented somewhere, then the problem does not exist.

MEM_ATC
AUS_ATC is offline  
Old 12-12-2006, 06:56 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Overnitefr8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 767 CA
Posts: 1,876
Default

I've always felt the late shift crew has done an excellent job. We know all the crew by voice recognition. (Only wish I could put a face to the voice).

So is MEM mgmt also going to go through the same shift cycle changes? Probably not.
Overnitefr8 is offline  
Old 12-12-2006, 07:19 PM
  #18  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerJosh View Post
Haven't you seen the latest addendum to the FAA managers handbook?

Rule 3456.2: If it ain't broke- screw around with it until it is!
Rule 3456.3: When it finally is broke/SNAFU, blame the front line personnel.

Your tax dollars at work... sorry to hear that the games continue...
You forgot
Rule 3456.3: We're not happy until you're not happy.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 12-12-2006, 07:22 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 56
Default

That midnight crew, (as well as the night crew), are awesome! They handle a very difficult situation every night with ease. Just let the new group screw it up a couple times and Fred will have the situation rectified.....QUICKLY!
DallasGatr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
banger
JetBlue
21
06-08-2019 05:07 PM
AUS_ATC
Cargo
29
02-02-2007 06:17 AM
AUS_ATC
Cargo
5
11-28-2006 10:03 AM
MaydayMark
Cargo
0
08-22-2006 12:51 PM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
10
11-18-2005 08:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices