Social media, contract expectations
#12
Another problem, what happens after a failed TA ?
So your NC really has to know its membership to get it right the 1st time.
I've been through the failed TA once before. The arbitrator was basically annoyed at both sides for being out of touch with the pilot group.
But no one is going to go back and re-write entire sections. Slight improvements were made to the major money sections, and what do you know, it ratifies.
In some ways the WHOLE process is flawed. Nothing we do/deliver is so important to the country that our contracts need to be RLA amendable and continue indefinitely to protect the vital interests of the nation like the railroads once did. But I digress !
So your NC really has to know its membership to get it right the 1st time.
I've been through the failed TA once before. The arbitrator was basically annoyed at both sides for being out of touch with the pilot group.
But no one is going to go back and re-write entire sections. Slight improvements were made to the major money sections, and what do you know, it ratifies.
In some ways the WHOLE process is flawed. Nothing we do/deliver is so important to the country that our contracts need to be RLA amendable and continue indefinitely to protect the vital interests of the nation like the railroads once did. But I digress !
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Another problem, what happens after a failed TA ?
So your NC really has to know its membership to get it right the 1st time.
I've been through the failed TA once before. The arbitrator was basically annoyed at both sides for being out of touch with the pilot group.
But no one is going to go back and re-write entire sections. Slight improvements were made to the major money sections, and what do you know, it ratifies.
In some ways the WHOLE process is flawed. Nothing we do/deliver is so important to the country that our contracts need to be RLA amendable and continue indefinitely to protect the vital interests of the nation like the railroads once did. But I digress !
So your NC really has to know its membership to get it right the 1st time.
I've been through the failed TA once before. The arbitrator was basically annoyed at both sides for being out of touch with the pilot group.
But no one is going to go back and re-write entire sections. Slight improvements were made to the major money sections, and what do you know, it ratifies.
In some ways the WHOLE process is flawed. Nothing we do/deliver is so important to the country that our contracts need to be RLA amendable and continue indefinitely to protect the vital interests of the nation like the railroads once did. But I digress !
I like your avatar, by the way. That is one nice looking dog.
#14
So, "My Negotiating Committee Speaks For Me" means what?
Speaks for me until I don't like what they say?
I'm not saying we abdicate our rights/responsibility to review and vote, but it is a little hypocritical to say they speak for us, then complain when they try to "convince" us to support what they negotiated for us.
Am I the only one who sees the irony here/
Speaks for me until I don't like what they say?
I'm not saying we abdicate our rights/responsibility to review and vote, but it is a little hypocritical to say they speak for us, then complain when they try to "convince" us to support what they negotiated for us.
Am I the only one who sees the irony here/
#15
No rebellion here...yet.
We have not seen what the company presented. More importantly, we have not seen OUR response. I'm fairly sure that the NC knows what will tick us off, so they will avoid that.
No need to torch the NC guys when they have not even said anything...
We have not seen what the company presented. More importantly, we have not seen OUR response. I'm fairly sure that the NC knows what will tick us off, so they will avoid that.
No need to torch the NC guys when they have not even said anything...
#16
Part Time Employee
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
It's negotiations! The negotiating committee can't dictate to the company what is acceptable - they present what we are asking for. The final result is usually somewhere in between.
The company's job is to make 50% + 1 of us happy!
Our negotiating committee is there to try and keep 100% of us happy!
If we as a group vote down what was agreed to between the comany and our negotiating committee does not mean the negotiating committee was out of touch, it only means that the company under estimated what we would accept!
If the TA fails it means the company failed not our negotiating committee.
My Negotiating Committee Speaks for ME is still valid. A failed TA means the company wasn't listening!
The company's job is to make 50% + 1 of us happy!
Our negotiating committee is there to try and keep 100% of us happy!
If we as a group vote down what was agreed to between the comany and our negotiating committee does not mean the negotiating committee was out of touch, it only means that the company under estimated what we would accept!
If the TA fails it means the company failed not our negotiating committee.
My Negotiating Committee Speaks for ME is still valid. A failed TA means the company wasn't listening!
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
So, "My Negotiating Committee Speaks For Me" means what?
Speaks for me until I don't like what they say?
I'm not saying we abdicate our rights/responsibility to review and vote, but it is a little hypocritical to say they speak for us, then complain when they try to "convince" us to support what they negotiated for us. Try not to forget who works for whom, as some in Alpa tend to do.
Am I the only one who sees the irony here/
Speaks for me until I don't like what they say?
I'm not saying we abdicate our rights/responsibility to review and vote, but it is a little hypocritical to say they speak for us, then complain when they try to "convince" us to support what they negotiated for us. Try not to forget who works for whom, as some in Alpa tend to do.
Am I the only one who sees the irony here/
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 394
No rebellion here...yet.
We have not seen what the company presented. More importantly, we have not seen OUR response. I'm fairly sure that the NC knows what will tick us off, so they will avoid that.
No need to torch the NC guys when they have not even said anything...
We have not seen what the company presented. More importantly, we have not seen OUR response. I'm fairly sure that the NC knows what will tick us off, so they will avoid that.
No need to torch the NC guys when they have not even said anything...
More characters needed...so I type for fun!
#19
It's negotiations! The negotiating committee can't dictate to the company what is acceptable - they present what we are asking for. The final result is usually somewhere in between.
The company's job is to make 50% + 1 of us happy!
Our negotiating committee is there to try and keep 100% of us happy!
The company's job is to make 50% + 1 of us happy!
Our negotiating committee is there to try and keep 100% of us happy!
So that leaves some portion of the crew force (50% -1 ) who have an axe to grind of the deferences of the TA. If your feel that way, your way more likely to use a public forum to vent your displeasure than if you at happy (or at least not so un happy as to vote no). We are seeing this in real time with the Delta pilots and their TA. Maybe they (collectively) have too big an expectation of what their NC/MEC can deliver. Maybe their MEC underestimated the wishes of their pilots. Or maybe a very vocal minority of Delta pilots, is really, really ****ed and are members of APC.
I hope for their sake they are either a very small group relative to the voting pilot group or are a very sizable majority.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
It's negotiations! The negotiating committee can't dictate to the company what is acceptable - they present what we are asking for. The final result is usually somewhere in between.
The company's job is to make 50% + 1 of us happy!
Our negotiating committee is there to try and keep 100% of us happy!
If we as a group vote down what was agreed to between the comany and our negotiating committee does not mean the negotiating committee was out of touch, it only means that the company under estimated what we would accept!
If the TA fails it means the company failed not our negotiating committee.
My Negotiating Committee Speaks for ME is still valid. A failed TA means the company wasn't listening!
The company's job is to make 50% + 1 of us happy!
Our negotiating committee is there to try and keep 100% of us happy!
If we as a group vote down what was agreed to between the comany and our negotiating committee does not mean the negotiating committee was out of touch, it only means that the company under estimated what we would accept!
If the TA fails it means the company failed not our negotiating committee.
My Negotiating Committee Speaks for ME is still valid. A failed TA means the company wasn't listening!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post